A questionnaire study to investigate custom and practice of imaging methods for the anterior region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Shelley, A M ^a,b   Wardle, L ^a   Goodwin, M ^c   Brunton, P ^b   Horner, K ^c  

^a Dental Practice   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Demography; Dental; Dental implants; Questionnaires; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHIN; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRESCRIPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHIN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRESCRIPTIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875174625     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120179     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Muller F, Naert I, et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009; 207: 185-186.
2. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 631-645.
3. Pigadas N, Simoes P, Tuffin Jr. Massive sublingual haematoma following osseo-integrated implant placement in the anterior mandible. Br Dent J 2009; 206: 67-68.
4. Hobkirk JA, Watson RM, Searson LJJ. Introducing dental implants. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.
5. European Commission. Radiation Protection 136. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2004.
6. FGDP(UK). Selection criteria in dental radiography: the safe use of radiographs in dental practice. 2nd edn. London, UK: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2004.
7. American Dental Association. The selection of patients for dental radiographic examinations. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration; 2004.
8. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 630-637.
9. Harris D, Horner K, Gr?ondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A concensus workshop organised by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Impl Res 2012; 23: 1243-1253.
10. Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K. Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 267-275.
11. Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement. J Dent 2011; 39: 764-770.
12. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail and mixedmode surveys. The tailored design method. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009.
13. Locker D. Response and nonresponse bias in oral health surveys. J Public Health Dent 2000; 60: 72-81.
14. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17: 873-890.
15. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
16. Church AH. Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 1993; 57: 62-79.
17. James JM, Bolstein R. Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 1992; 56: 442-453.
18. Hayward R. Training standards in implant dentistry. London, UK: Faculty of General Dental Practice; 2008.
19. European Commission. Radiation Protection 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology: evidence based guidelines. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2012.
20. Bender R, Lange S.Multiple test procedures other than Bonferroni's deserve wider use. BMJ 1999; 318: 600-601.
21. Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 1998; 316: 1236-1238.
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995; 310: 170.
23. Shelley AM, Horner K. A transymphyseal X-ray projection to assess the anterior edentulons mandible prior to implant placement. Dental Update 2008; 35: 689-694.
24. Kviz FJ. Toward a standard definition of response rate. Public Opin Q 1977; 41: 265-267.
25. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 1129-1136.