Location, education and enterprise growth

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1019-1022

  Herstad, Sverre J ^a   Sandven, Tore ^b   Solberg, Espen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

^b NORDIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN INNOVATION   (Norway)

Author keywords

capabilities; education; growth; location

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GROWTH; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT; EMPLOYMENT GENERATION; ENTREPRENEUR; LOCATION-ALLOCATION MODEL; OECD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

NORWAY;

EID: 84875170399     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: 14664291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2013.772287     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I. and McHale, J. 2006. Gone but not forgotten: knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 571-91.
2. Audretsch, D. B. 1995. Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13: 441-57.
3. Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C. and Feldman, H. D. 2011. Managerial capabilities and path to growth as determinants of high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 29: 671-94.
4. Bouty, I. 2000. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. The Academy of Management Journal, 43: 50-65.
5. Breschi, S., Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. 2000. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110: 388-410.
6. Coeurderoy, R., Cowling, M., Licht, G. and Murray, G. 2010. Young firm internationalization and survival: empirical tests on a panel of 'adolescent' new technology-based firms in Germany and the UK. International Small Business Journal, 30: 472-92.
7. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity-a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-52.
8. Ebersberger, B. and Herstad, S. 2013. The relationship between international innovation collaboration, intramural R&D and SME's innovation performance: a quantile regression approach. Applied Economic Letters, 20: 626-30.
9. Fernhaber, S. A., Gilbert, B. A. and McDougall, P. P. 2008. International entrepreneurship and geographic location: an empirical examination of new venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 267-90.
10. Freel, M. and Robson, P. J. A. 2004. Small firm innovation, growth and performance: evidence from Scotland and Northern England. International Small Business Journal, 22: 561-75.
11. Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J. and Shleifer, A. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 1126-52.
12. Jukvam, D. 2002. Defining Labour Market Regions, Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.
13. Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B. A. 2010. Accounting for creativity in the European Union: a multi-level analysis of individual competence, labour market structure, and systems of education and training. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35: 269-94.
14. Napier, G., Rouvinen, P. and Johanson, D. 2012. The Nordic Growth Entrepreneurship Review 2012, Oslo: Nordic Innovation.
15. OECD. 2010. High Growth Enterprises: What Governments Can Do to Make a Difference, Paris: OECD.
16. Penrose, J. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
17. Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49: 751-66.
18. Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H. and Shepherd, D. A. 2009. Building an integrative theory of small business growth. Small Business Economics, 32: 351-74.
19. Zahra, S. A. and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27: 185-203.