Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: Visual characteristics and impact on image quality

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Spin Neto, R ^a   Mudrak, J ^b   Matzen, L H ^a   Christensen, J ^a   Gotfredsen, E ^a   Wenzel, A ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b Oral Surgery   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artefacts; Cone beam computed tomography; Image quality

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; ORBIT; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; ROBOTICS; ROTATION; SKULL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; ARTIFACTS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOLAR, THIRD; ORBIT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROBOTICS; ROTATION; SKULL;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875155663     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/32310645     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1088-1095.
2. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1285-1292.
3. Hanzelka T, Foltan R, Horka E, Sedy J. Reduction of the negative influence of patient motion on quality of CBCT scan. Med Hypotheses 2010; 75: 610-612.
4. Schulze R, Heil U, Grob D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273.
5. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Muller S, Mueller-Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 198-203.
6. Schulze RKW, Berndt D, d'Hoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artefacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 100-107.
7. Stuehmer C, Essig H, Bormann KH, Majdani O, Gellrich NC, Rucker M. Cone beam CT imaging of airgun injuries to the craniomaxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 903-906.
8. Li G, Citrin D, Camphausen K, Mueller B, Burman C, Mychalczak B, et al. Advances in 4D medical imaging and 4D radiation therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2008; 7: 67-81.
9. Song JY, Nam TK, Ahn SJ, Chung WK, Yoon MS, Nah BS. Respiratory motional effect on cone-beam CT in lung radiation surgery. Med Dosim 2009; 34: 117-125.
10. Crum WR, Hartkens T, Hill DL. Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: S140-S153.
11. Kawakami Y, Suga K, Yamashita T, Iwanaga H, Zaki M, Matsunaga N. Initial application of respiratory-gated 201Tl SPECT in pulmonary malignant tumours. Nucl Med Commun 2005; 26: 303-313.
12. Pluim JP, Maintz JB, Viergever MA. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22: 986-1004.
13. Sonke JJ, Zijp L, Remeijer P, van Herk M. Respiratory correlated cone beam CT. Med Phys 2005; 32: 1176-1186.
14. Xu S, Taylor RH, Fichtinger G, Cleary K. Lung deformation estimation and four-dimensional CT lung reconstruction. Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 1082-1092.
15. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR. Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 460-470.
16. Naslund EB, Moystad A, Larheim TA, Ogaard B, Kruger M. Cephalometric analysis with digital storage phosphor images: extreme low-exposure images with and without postprocessing noise reduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 190-197.
17. Zhang Q, Hu YC, Liu F, Goodman K, Rosenzweig KE, Mageras GS. Correction of motion artifacts in cone-beam CT using a patientspecific respiratory motion model. Med Phys 2010; 37: 2901-2909.
18. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-730.
19. Suomalainen A, Venta I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 276-284.
20. Matzen LH, Christensen J, Hintze H, Schou S, Wenzel A. Influence of Cone Beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy versus surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012 Aug 29. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/98870341.
21. Gaia BF, Sales MA, Perrella A, Fenyo-Pereira M, Cavalcanti MG. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography for identification of simulated bone lesions. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25: 362-368.
22. Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Wilson R, Pitt Ford T. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 507-515.
23. Closmann JJ, Schmidt BL. The use of cone beam computed tomography as an aid in evaluating and treatment planning for mandibular cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 766-771.