Reproductive outcomes, including neonatal data, following sperm injection in men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: Case series and systematic review

Clinics

Volumn 68, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages 141-149

  Esteves, Sandro C ^a   Agarwal, Ashok ^b  

^a Androfert   (Brazil)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Azoospermia; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Male infertility; Pregnancy outcomes; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

AZOOSPERMIA; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; REVIEW; SPERM RETRIEVAL;

AZOOSPERMIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; SPERM RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84875149991     PISSN: 18075932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(Sup01)16     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506-12, http://dx. doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046.
2. World Health Organization. WHO Manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile couple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
3. Vital and Health Statistics, series 23, no.26, CDC. Accessed December 10, 2009. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov.
4. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62-5.
5. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male. Clinics. 2011;66(4):691-700, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1590/S1807-59322011000400026.
6. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. Surgical treatment of male infertility in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-new insights. Clinics. 2011;66(8):1463-78, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000800026.
7. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproduction. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37(5):570-83.
8. Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2003. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2209-U121, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.058.
9. Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(6):1586-622, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2006.01.011.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2009 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. Accessed 13 March 2012. Available from: www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2009/index.htm.
11. Georgiou I, Syrrou M, Pardalidis N, Karakitsios K, Mantzavinos T, Giotitsas N, et al. Genetic and epigenetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Asian J Androl. 2006;8(6):643-73.
12. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.p.128.
13. Marinelli CM, Borges JE, Antunes Jr N. Reprodução assistida e infertilidade masculina. Int Braz J Urol. 2003;29(Suppl 5):42-5.
14. Esteves SC, Schertz JC, Verza S, Jr., Schneider DT, Zabaglia SF. A comparison of menotropin, highly-purified menotropin and follitropin alfa in cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:111, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-111.
15. Verza S, Jr., Esteves SC. Sperm defect severity rather than sperm Source is associated with lower fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(1):49-56.
16. Esteves SC, Schneider DT, Verza S, Jr. Influence of antisperm antibodies in the semen on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33(6):795-802.
17. Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Sperm retrieval techniques. In: Gardner DK, Rizk BRMB, Falcone T, Eds. Human Assisted Reproductive Technology: Future Trends in Laboratory and Clinical Practice. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. pp.41-53, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734755.006.
18. Veeck LL. An atlas of human gametes and conceptuses: an illustrated reference for assisted reproductive technology. New York: Parthenon Pub. Group; 1999.215p.
19. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155-8, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5.
20. Esteves SC, Schneider DT. Male infertility and assisted reproductive technology: lessons from the IVF. Open Reprod Sci J. 2011;3:138-53, http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874255601103010138.
21. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Fahmy I, Kamal A, Tawab NA, et al. Fertilization and pregnancy rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection using ejaculate semen and surgically retrieved sperm. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(1):108-11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81484-7.
22. Ghazzawi IM, Sarraf MG, Taher MR, Khalifa FA. Comparison of the fertilizing capability of spermatozoa from ejaculates, epididymal aspirates and testicular biopsies using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(2):348-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13. 2.348.
23. Ubaldi F, Nagy ZP, Rienzi L, Tesarik J, Anniballo R, Franco G, et al. Reproductive capacity of spermatozoa from men with testicular failure. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2796-800, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.11.2796.
24. Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Hariprashad JJ, Ergun B, Mielnik A, Zaninovic N, et al. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):741-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.3.741.
25. De Croo I, Van der Elst J, Everaert K, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Fertilization, pregnancy and embryo implantation rates after ICSI in cases of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(6):1383-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.6.1383.
26. Bukulmez O, Yucel A, Yarali H, Bildirici I, Gurgan T. The origin of spermatozoa does not affect intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;94(2):250-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00347-X.
27. Schwarzer JU, Fiedler K, Hertwig I, Krusmann G, Wurfel W, Muhlen B, et al. Male factors determining the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa. Andrologia. 2003;35(4):220-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0272.2003.00563.x.
28. Ghanem M, Bakr NI, Elgayaar MA, El Mongy S, Fathy H, Ibrahim AH. Comparison of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia in the first cycle: a report of case series and meta-analysis. Int J Androl. 2005;28(1):16-21.
29. La Sala GB, Valli B, Leoni S, Pescarini M, Martino F, Nicoli A. Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in 327 ICSI cycles. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2006;51(4):177-82.
30. Semiao-Francisco L, Braga DP, Figueira Rde C, Madaschi C, Pasqualotto FF, Iaconelli A, Jr., et al. Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in azoospermic men: 10 years of experience with surgical sperm retrieval. Aging Male. 2010;13(1):44-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13685530903342203.
31. He X, Cao Y, Zhang Z, Zhao J, Wei Z, Zhou P, et al. Spermatogenesis affects the outcome of ICSI for azoospermic patients rather than sperm retrieval method. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010;56(6):457-64, http://dx. doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2010.513078.
32. Vernaeve V, Bonduelle M, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Pregnancy outcome and neonatal data of children born after ICSI using testicular spermin obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(10):2093-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg403.
33. Fedder J, Gabrielsen A, Humaidan P, Erb K, Ernst E, Loft A. Malformation rate and sex ratio in 412 children conceived with epididymal or testicular sperm. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(4):1080-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del488.
34. Belva F, De Schrijver F, Tournaye H, Liebaers I, Devroey P, Haentjens P, et al. Neonatal outcome of 724 children born after ICSI using nonejaculated sperm. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1752-8, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/humrep/der121.
35. Bonduelle M, Van Assche E, Joris H, Keymolen K, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10):2600-14, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/humrep/17.10.2600.
36. Jozwiak EA, Ulug U, Mesut A, Erden HF, Bahceci M. Prenatal karyotypes of fetuses conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):628-33, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2004.02.110.
37. Ludwig M, Katalinic A. Malformation rate in fetuses and children conceived after ICSI: results of a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(2):171-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10) 61621-5.
38. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999). Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):671-94, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.3.671.
39. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods. Birth Defects Res A. 2005;73(3):162-9, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/bdra.20107.
40. Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Westlander G, Wikland M, Wood M. Obstetric outcome of pregnancies following ICSI, classified according to sperm origin and quality. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1189-94, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.5.1189.
41. Mateizel I, Verheyen G, Van Assche E, Tournaye H, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. FISH analysis of chromosome X, Y and 18 abnormalities in testicular sperm from azoospermic patients. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2249-57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.9.2249.