Subnational participation in national decisions: The role of second chambers

Handbook on Multi-level Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 103-123

  Swenden, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875125953     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Baker, R.K. (1995), House vs Senate, New York: Norton.
2. Baldwin, Nicholas D.J. and Donald Shell (eds) (2001), 'Special issue - second chambers', Journal of Legislative Studies, 7, 1.
3. Bolleyer, Nicole (2006a), 'Federal dynamics in Canada, the United States and Switzerland', Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 36 (4), 471-502.
4. Bolleyer, Nicole (2006b), 'Intergovernmental arrangements in Spanish and Swiss federalism: the impact of power- sharing and power- concentrating executives on intergovernmental institutionalization', Regional and Federal Studies, 16 (4), 385-408.
5. Burgess, Michael (2006), Comparative Federalism. Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.
6. Cain, Bruce, John A. Ferejohn and P. Morris Fiorina (1987), The Personal Vote. Constituency Service and Electoral Independence, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Diaz- Cayeros, A. (2006), Federalism, Fiscal Authority, and Centralization in Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Elazar, Daniel J. (1987), Exploring Federalism, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
9. Evans, H. (ed.) (1997), Odger's Australian Senate Practice, 8th edn, Canberra: AEPS.
10. Franks, C.E.S. (1999), 'Not dead yet, but should it be resurrected. The Canadian Senate', in Samuel C. Patterson and Anthony Mughan (eds), Senates. Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, pp. 120-61.
11. Fromme, Friedrich Karl (1981), Gesetzgebung im Widerstreit. Wer beherrscht den Bundesrat? Die Kontroverse 1969-1976 2nd edn, Stuttgart: Bonn Aktuell.
12. Gill, Graeme (2007), Politics in the Russian Regions, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Gordin, Jorge (2010), 'Patronage-preserving federalism?: Legislative malapportionment and subnational fiscal policies', in Jan Erk and Wilfried Swenden (eds), New Directions in Federalism Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 68-82.
14. Grauí Creus, Mireilla (2000), 'Spain: incomplete federalism', in Ute Wachendorfer- Schmidt (ed.), Federalism and Political Performance, London: Routledge, pp. 58-77.
15. Grodzins, Morton (1966), The American System: A New View of Government in the United States, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
16. Gunlicks, A.B. (2002), 'The impact of unification on German federalism', German Politics, 11 (3), 131-51.
17. Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks and Arjan Schakel (2008), Measuring Regional Authority, Special Issue, Regional and Federal Studies, 18, (2-3).
18. Howard, C. and C. Saunders (1977),'The blocking of the budget and dismissal of the government', in G. Evans (ed.), Labor and the Constitution, 1972-1975, Melbourne: Heinemann, pp. 251-301.
19. Hrbek, Rudolf (2006), 'Ein neuer Anlauf zur Föderalismusreform: Das Kompromisspaket der Großen Koalition', Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus- Forschung Tübingen (ed.), Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2006, Baden- Baden: Nomos, pp. 139-58.
20. Hueglin, Thomas O. and Alan Fenna (2006), Comparative Federalism. A Systematic Inquiry, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
21. Jaensch, Dean (1986), Getting Our Houses in Order. Australia's Parliament: How it Works and the Need for Reform, Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin,
22. Jaensch, Dean (1994), Australia's Party System, St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
23. Jeffery, C. (ed.) (1999), Recasting German Federalism. The Legacies of Unification, London: Pinter.
24. Juberías, Carlos Flores (1999), 'A house in search of a role: the Senado of Spain', in Samuel C. Patterson and Anthony Mughan (eds), Senates. Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, pp. 260-300.
25. Klatt, H. (1999), 'Centralizing trends in West German federalism', in Charlie Jeffery (ed.), Recasting German Federalism. The Legacies of Unification, London: Pinter, pp. 40-57.
26. Kramer, J. (2005), 'Federal Republic of Germany', in John Kincaid and Alan Tarr (eds), A Global Dialogue on Federalism, Kingston: McGill- Queen's University Press, pp. 143-79.
27. Krasno, J.S. (1994), Challengers, Competition and Re- election. Comparing Senate and House Elections, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Lee, F.E. and B.I. Oppenheimer (1998), Sizing up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1998), Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spanungslagen im institutionengefüge der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 2nd edn, Wiesbaden: Opladen.
30. Leonardy, Uwe (2002), 'Parteien im Föderalismus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Scharniere zwischen Staat und Politik', Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 33 (1), 180-95.
31. Lijphart, Arend (1992), Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Lijphart, Arend (1999), Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty- six Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Llanos, Mariana and Detlef Nolte (2003), 'Bicameralism in the Americas: around the extremes of symmetry and congruence', Journal of Legislative Studies, 9 (3), Autumn, 54-86.
34. Loughlin, John (2007), Subnational Government. The French Experience, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Luther, Jörg, Paolo Passaglia and Rolando Tarchi (2006), A World of Second Chambers. Handbook for Constitutional Studies on Bicameralism, No. 4, Milan: Giuffrè Editore, Centre for Studies on Federalism Series.
36. Müller, Wolfgang C., Torbjärn Bergman and Kaare Ström (2004), 'Parliamentary democracy: promise and problems', in Kaare Ström, Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjärn Bergman (eds), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Obinger, H., K. Armigeon, G. Bonoli and F. Bertozzi (2005), 'Switzerland: the marriage of direct democracy and federalism', in H. Obinger, S. Leibfried and F.G. Castles (eds), Federalism and the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263-304.
38. Patterson, Samuel C. and Anthony Mughan (1999), Senates. Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
39. Peterson, Paul (1995), The Price of Federalism, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Pierson, Paul (1995), 'Fragmented welfare states: federal institutions and the development of social policy', Governance, 8 (4), 449-78.
41. Quick, John and Robert Garran (1901), The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
42. Renzsch, Wolfgang (1999), 'Party competition in the German federal state: new variations on an old theme', Regional and Federal Studies, 9 (3), 180-92.
43. Riescher, Gisela, Ruß Sabine and Christoph M. Haas (eds) (2000), Zweite Kammern, Munich and Vienna: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.
44. Roller, Elisa (2002), 'Reforming the Spanish Senate: mission impossible?', West European Politics, 25 (4), 69-93.
45. Russell, Meg (2000), Reforming the House of Lords. Lessons from Overseas, Oxford: Oxford University Press and The Constitution Unit.
46. Russell, Meg (2001), 'The territorial role of second chambers', Journal of Legislative Studies, 7 (1), 105-18.
47. Samuels, David (2000), 'Concurrent elections, discordant results: presidentialism, federalism and governance in Brazil', Comparative Politics, 33 (1), 1-20.
48. Samuels, David and Scott Mainwaring (2004), 'Federalism, constraints on the central government, and economic reform in Brazil', in Edward Gibson (ed.), Representing Regions: Federalism and Territorial Politics in Latin America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 85-131.
49. Samuels, David and Richard Snyder (2001), 'The value of a vote: malapportionment in comparative perspective', British Journal of Political Science, 31, 651-71.
50. Sawer, G. (1969), Modern Federalism, 1st edn, Sydney: Pitman.
51. Sawer, Geoffrey (1976), Modern Federalism, 2nd edn, Sydney: Pitman Australia.
52. Scharpf, F.W. (1994), Optionen des Föderalismus in Deutschland und Europa, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
53. Scharpf, F.W. (1995), 'Federal arrangements and multi- level party systems', Australian Journal of Political Science, 30, Special Issue on the Party System, Representation and Policy- making, Australian Trends in Comparative Perspective, 27-39.
54. Sinclair, Barbara (1989), The Transformation of the US Senate, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55. Smiley, D.V. and R.L. Watts (1985), Intra- state Federalism in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
56. Smith, David E. (2007), 'The Senate of Canada and the conundrum of reform', Institute for Intergovernmental Relations, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Special Working Paper Series on Senate Reform 2007-2008.
57. Stepan, Alfred (2001), 'Toward a new comparative politics of federalism, (multi)- nationalism, and democracy: beyond Rikerian federalism', in A. Stepan (ed.), Arguing Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 315-62.
58. Stepan, Alfred and Wilfried Swenden (1997), 'Databank on federal Upper Houses', Research note prepared for the conference on Federalism, Multinationalism and Democracy, All Souls College, Oxford, 5-8 June 1997.
59. Sturm, Roland (2001), Föderalismus in Deutschland, Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
60. Swenden, Wilfried (2004), Federalism and Second Chambers. Regional Representation in Parliamentary Federations: The Australian Senate and German Bundesrat Compared, Brussels: P.I.E- Peter Lang, Series on Regionalism and Federalism, General Editor Michael Keating.
61. Swenden, Wilfried (2006), Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe. A Comparative and Thematic Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
62. Swift, Elaine (1996), The Making of an American Senate, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
63. Tsebelis, George and Jeanette Money (1997), Bicameralism. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Uhr, John (2006), 'Bicameralism', in R.A.W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 474-94.
65. Vanhee, D. (2003), De rol van de Vlaamse gemeenschapssenatoren in de federale staatsstructuur tijdens de legislatuur 1995-1999, Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University, MA thesis in Political Science.
66. Vatter, Adrian (2004), 'Challenges to intergovernmental relations in Switzerland and Japan', Swiss Political Science Review, 10 (3) online version.
67. Vatter, Adrian (2005), 'Bicameralism and policy performance: the effects of cameral structure in comparative perspective', Journal of Legislative Studies, 11 (2), 194-215.
68. Verhofstadt, Guy (2008), 'Verslag aan Koning Albert II over de hervorming van de instellingen in het kader van mijn informatie- en formatieopdracht', personal address of Belgian PM Verhofstadt addressed to King Albert II on the envisaged process of institutional reform, PM Press services, s.d.
69. Wälti, Sonja (1996), 'Institutional reform of federalism: changing the players rather than the rules of the game', Swiss Political Science Review, 9 (1), 107-37.
70. Watts, R.L. (1999), Comparing Federal Systems in the 1990s, 2nd edn, Kingston, Ontario: McGill- Queen's University Press.
71. Watts, R.L. (2007), 'Federal second chambers compared', Institute for Intergovernmental Relations, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Special Working Paper Series on Senate Reform 2007-2008.
72. Wheare, K.C. (1963), Federal Government, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.