Federal dynamics in Canada, the United States, and Switzerland: How substates' internal organization affects intergovernmental relations

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 471-502

  Bolleyer, Nicole ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750403976     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: 17477107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjl003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agranoff, Robert. 2004. Autonomy, devolution, and intergovernmental relations. Regional and Federal Studies 14: 26-65.
2. Armingeon, Klaus. 2000. Swiss federalism in comparative perspective. In Federalism and political performance, ed. Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt, 112-129. London: Routledge.
3. Arnold, David S., and Jeremy Plant. 1994. Public official associations and state and local government. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
4. Banting, Keith, and Stan Corbett. 2001. Health policy and federalism: A comparative perspective on multi-level governance. Kingston: Queen's.
5. Benz, Arthur. 2003. Konstruktive Vetospieler in Mehrebenensystemen. In Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie, Innovationen und Blockaden, ed. Renate Mayntz and Wolfgang Streeck, 205-238. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
6. Birchfield, Vicky, and Markus Crepaz. 1998. The impact of constitutional structures and collective and competitive veto points on income inequality in industrialised democracies. European Journal of Political Research 34: 175-200.
7. Bolleyer, Nicole, forthcoming. Intergovernmental arrangements in Spanish and Swiss federalism: The impact of power-concentrating and power-sharing executives on boundary-crossing cooperation. Regional and Federal Studies.
8. Börzel, Tanja A. 2000. From competitive to cooperative federalism: The Europeanization of the Spanish state of autonomies. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30: 17-43.
9. _. 2001. Föderative Staaten in einer entgrenzten Welt: Regionaler Standortwettbewerb oder gemeinsames Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. In Föderalismus: Analysen in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, PVS Sondeheft 32, ed. Arthur Benz and Gerhard Lehmbruch, 363-388. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
10. _. 2002. States and regions in the European Union: Institutional adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bowman, Ann O'M. 2004a. Trends and issues in interstate cooperation. In The Book of the States 2004, ed. Council of State Governments, 34-40. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
12. _. 2004b. Horizontal federalism: Exploring interstate interaction. Journal of Public Administration Research 14: 535-546.
13. Braun, Dietmar. 2000. Public policy and federalism. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
14. Breton, Albert. 1985. Supplementary statement. In Government of Canada, vol, 3, 486-526. Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada, Ottawa.
15. _. 1996. Competitive governments: An economic theory of politics and public finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cameron, David. 2001. The structures of intergovernmental relations. International Science Journal 52: 121-127.
17. Cameron, David, and Richard Simeon. 2002. Intergovernmental relations in Canada: The emergence of collaborative federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32: 49-71.
18. Cigler, Beverly A. 1995. Not just another special interest. In Interest group politics, ed. Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, 131-153. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
19. Conlan, Timothy J. 2000. Courting devolution: The U.S. Supreme Court and contemporary American federalism. In The politics of constitutional reform in North America: Coping with new challenges, ed. Rainer-Olaf Schultze and Roland Sturm, 117-128. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich.
20. Derthick, Martha. 2001. Keeping the compound republic: Essays on federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings.
21. Downs, William M. 1998. Coalition government subnational style: Multiparty politics in Europe's regional parliaments. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
22. Dyck, Rand. 1986. Provincial politics in Canada. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall Canada.
23. Elazar, Daniel J. 1990. Opening the third century of American federalism: Issues and prospects. In American federalism: The third century, ed. John Kincaid, 11-21. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. _. 1991. Cooperative federalism. In Competition among states and local governments: Efficiency and equity in American federalism, ed. Daphne A. Kenyon and John Kincaid, 65-86. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
25. Freiburghaus, Dieter, and Vital Zehnder. 2003. Horizontale Kooperation zwischen den Kantonen und die "systematisch-pragmatische Zusammenarbeit" in der Zentralschweiz. Working paper, Institut de Hautes Etudes en Administration Publique 4, 1-15, Lausanne.
26. Haider, Donald H. 1974. When governments come to Washington: Governors, mayors, and intergovernmental lobbying. New York: Free Press.
27. Héritier, Adrienne. 1996. Institutions, interests, and political choice. In Institutions and political choice: On the limits of rationality, ed. Roland Czada, Adrienne Héritier, and Hans Keman, 27-42. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Press.
28. Hickok, Eugene W., Jr. 1990. Federalism's future before the U.S. Supreme Court. In American federalism: The third century, ed. John Kincaid, 73-82. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Hooghe, Liesbet. 1996. Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30. Jahresbericht CH, Stiftung. 2001. Stiftung für Eidgenössische Zusammenarbeit, Bern.
31. Johns, Carolyn M., Patricia L. O'Reilly, and Gregory J. Inwood. 2004. Formal and informal dimensions of intergovernmental administrative relations in Canada. Paper presented at the conference "21st Century Challenges: Remaking Intergovernmental Canada.", Vancouver, August 29-September 1.
32. Judge, David. 2003. Legislative institutionalization: A bent analytical arrow? Government and Opposition 38: 497-514.
33. Jung, Saskia. 2005. When do political actors agree to shifts of social program responsibilities in federal systems? Paper presented at the Third Annual EPSAnet Conference, "Making Social Policy in the Industrial Age," Fribourg, Switzerland, September 22-24.
34. Kaiser, André. 1997. Types of democracy. From classical to new institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 419-444.
35. Katz, Richard. 1994. Party organizations as empty vessels: Parties in American politics. In How parties organise: Change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies, ed. Richard Katz and Peter Mair, 23-50. London: Sage.
36. Kenyon, Daphne A., and John Kincaid. 1991. Competition among states and local governments: Efficiency and equity in American federalism. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
37. Kincaid, John. 1990. From cooperative to coercive federalism. In American federalism: The third century, ed. John Kincaid, 139-152. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. Effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12: 3-27.
39. Ladner, Andreas. 2001. Swiss political parties: Between persistance and change. West European Politics 24: 123-44.
40. Lazar, Harvey. 2002. Shifting roles: Active labour market policy in Canada under the Labour Market Development Agreement: A conference report. Canadian Policy Research Networks, http://www.cprn.com.
41. Lazar, Harvey, and John McLean. 2000. Non-constitutional reform and the Canadian federation: The only game in town. In The politics of constitutional reform in North America: Coping with new challenges, ed. Rainer-Olaf Schultze and Roland Sturm, 149-176. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich.
42. Lazar, Harvey, Hamish Telford, and Ronald L. Watts. 2003. The impact of global and regional integration on federal systems: A comparative analysis. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
43. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1978. Party and federation in Germany: A developmental dilemma. Government and Opposition 13: 151-177.
44. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
45. McRoberts, Kenneth. 1985. Unilateralism, bilateralism and multilateralism: Approaches to Canadian federalism. In Intergovernmental relations, ed. Richard Simeon, 71-130. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
46. _. 1993. Federal structures and the policy process. In Governing Canada: Institutions and public policy, ed. Michael M. Atkinson, 149-178. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
47. Meekison, Peter J., Hamish Telford, and Harvey Lazar. 2004. The institutions of executive federalism: Myths and realities. In Canada: The state of the federation, 2002: Reconsidering the institutions of Canadian federalism, ed. Peter J. Meekison, Hamish Telford, and Harvey Lazar, Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.
48. Minger, Thomas, 2004. Die Geschichte der Konferenz der Kantonsregierungen. In 10 Jahre KdK: Standortbestimmung und Ausblick, ed. Konferenz der Kantonsregierungen, Bern: 8-11.
49. Neidhart, Leonhard. 1970: Plebiszit und Pluralitaere Demokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktion des Schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums, Bern: Francke.
50. _. 2001. Elementare Bedingungen der Entwicklung des schweizerischen Föderalismus. In Föderalismus: Analysen in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, PVS Sonderheft 32, ed. Arthur Benz and Gerhard Lehmbruch, 111-133. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
51. Opeskin, Brian R. 2001. Mechanisms for intergovernmental relations in federations. International Science Journal 52: 129-138.
52. Peters, B. Guy, and Jon Pierre. 2001. Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy and Politics 29: 131-135.
53. Provost, Colin L. 2003. State attorneys general, entrepreneurship, and consumer protection in the new federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 33: 37-53.
54. Québec Liberal Party. 2001. A Project for Québec: Affirmation, autonomy and leadership. Final report, Québec Liberal Party. http://www/plq.org/en/informez_vous/programme.html.
55. Riker, William H. 1964. Federalism, origin, operation, significance. Boston: Little Brown.
56. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
57. Simeon, Richard. 1972. Federal-provincial diplomacy: The making of recent policy in Canada. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
58. _. 2001. Adaptability and change in federations. International Science Journal 52: 145-152.
59. Simmons, Julie M. 2004. Securing the threads of cooperation in the tapestry of intergovernmental relations: Does the institutionalization of ministerial conferences matter? Canada: The State of the Federation 2002: Reconsidering the Institutions of Canadian Federalism, ed. J. Peter Meekison, Hamish Telford, and Harvey Lazar, 425-462. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
60. Skogstad, Grace. 2000. Canada: Dual and executive federalism: Ineffective problem-solving. In Public policy and federalism, ed. Dietmar Braun, 57-77. Aldershot, UK: Althenaeum Press.
61. Smiley, Donald V. 1980. Canada in question: Federalism in the eighties, 3d ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
62. _. 1987. The federal condition in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
63. Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Thorlakson, Lori. 2003. Comparing federal institutions: Power and representation in six federations. West European Politics 26: 1-22. Oxford: Routledge.
65. _. Forthcoming An institutional explanation of party system congruence: Evidence from six federations. European Journal of Political Research.
66. Vatter, Adrian. 2002. Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich: Entstehungsgründe, Interaktionen und Wirkungen politischer Institutionen in den Schweizer Kantonen. Opladen, Germany: Leske+Budrich.
67. Watts, Ronald L. 1999. Comparing federal systems. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
68. Zimmerman, Joseph F. 1992. Contemporary American federalism: The growth of national power. Westport, CT: Praeger.
69. _. 2001. Interstate cooperation: compacts and administrative agreements. Westport, CT: Praeger.