Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: A retrospective analysis of element presence

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Köpcke, Felix ^a   Trinczek, Benjamin ^b   Majeed, Raphael W ^c   Schreiweis, Björn ^d   Wenk, Joachim ^e   Leusch, Thomas ^f   Ganslandt, Thomas ^g   Ohmann, Christian ^e   Bergh, Björn ^c   Röhrig, Rainer ^c   Dugas, Martin ^b   Prokosch, Hans Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c Anaesthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e Department of Orthopedic Surgery   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical trials as topic; Data quality; Database; Electronic health records; Information systems; Patient selection; Research subject recruitment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84875125416     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-37     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T, Methods Inf Med. 2009 48 1 38 44 19151882
2. Toward a National Framework for the Secondary Use of Health Data: An American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, Labkoff S, Markel-Fox S, Tang PC, Detmer DE, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007 14 1 9 17077452 (Pubitemid 44909487)
3. Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials. Cuggia M, Besana P, Glasspool D, Int J Med Inform 2011 80 6 371 388 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.003 21459664
4. Decision support for clinical trial eligibility determination in breast cancer. Ohno-Machado L, Wang S, Mar P, Boxwala A, Proceedings of the AMIA symposium 6-10 November 1999 Washington, DC, USA Philadelphia, PA, USA: Hanley & Belfus, Lorenzi NM, 1999 340 344
5. Workflow to improve patient recruitment for clinical trials within hospital information systems-a case-study. Dugas M, Lange M, Berdel WE, Müller-Tidow C, Trials 2008 9 2 10.1186/1745-6215-9-2 18186949 (Pubitemid 351313702)
6. Matching patient records to clinical trials using ontologies. Patel C, Cimino JJ, Dolby J, Fokoue A, Kalyanpur A, Kershenbaum A, Ma L, Schonberg E, Srinivas K, ISWC'07/ASWC'07 Proceedings of the 6th international semantic web conference and 2nd Asian semantic web conference 11-15 November, 2007 Busan, Korea Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Aberer K, Choi KS, Noy N, Allemang D, Lee KI, Nixon L, Golbeck J, Mika P, Maynard D, Mizoguchi R, Schreiber G, Cudré-Mauroux P, 2007 816 829 23126183
7. Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review. Weng C, Tu SW, Sim I, Richesson R, J Biomed Inform 2010 43 3 451 467 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004 20034594
8. Formulating Queries for Assessing Clinical Trial Eligibility. Lonsdale D, Tustison C, Parker C, Embley DW, NLDB'06 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems 31 May-2 June, 2006 Klagenfurt, Austria Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Kop C, Fliedl G, Mayr HC, Métais E, 2006 82 93 8431196 (Pubitemid 44165356)
9. Electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP, Med Care Res Rev. 2010 67 5 503 527 Epub 2010 Feb 11 10.1177/1077558709359007 20150441
10. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Pringle M, Ward P, Chilvers C, Br J Gen Pract 1995 45 399 537 541 7492423
11. Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? Scobie S, Basnett I, McCartney P, J Public Health Med 1995 17 4 475 483 8639350 (Pubitemid 26025389)
12. ART-LINC collaboration of International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS: Electronic medical record systems, data quality and loss to follow-up: survey of antiretroviral therapy programmes in resource-limited settings. Forster M, Bailey C, Brinkhof MW, Graber C, Boulle A, Spohr M, Balestre E, May M, Keiser O, Jahn A, Egger M, Bull World Health Organ 2008 86 12 939 947 10.2471/BLT.07.049908 19142294
13. Secondary Use of EHR: Data Quality Issues and Informatics Opportunities. Botsis T, Hartvigsen G, Chen F, Weng C, AMIA Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2010 2010 1 5 21347133
14. Dynamic categorization of clinical research eligibility criteria by hierarchical clustering. Luo Z, Yetisgen-Yildiz M, Weng C, J Biomed Inform. 2011 44 6 927 935 Epub 2011 Jun 12 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.06.001 21689783
15. Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes (LOINC) database: a public use set of codes and names for electronic reporting of clinical laboratory results. Forrey AW, McDonald CJ, DeMoor G, Huff SM, Leavelle D, Leland D, Fiers T, Charles L, Griffin B, Stalling F, Tullis A, Hutchins K, Baenziger J, Clin Chem 1996 42 81 90 8565239
16. Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform. El Fadly A, Rance B, Lucas N, Mead C, Chatellier G, Lastic PY, Jaulent MC, Daniel C, J Biomed Inform. 2011 44 1 94 102 Epub 2011 Aug 25 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.10.002 20971216
17. Comparison of two VA laboratory data repositories indicates that missing data vary despite originating from the same source. McGinnis KA, Skanderson M, Levin FL, Brandt C, Erdos J, Justice AC, Medical Care 2009 47 121 124 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d69c2 19106740
18. Electronic health record-based cardiac risk assessment and identification of unmet preventive needs. Persell SD, Dunne AP, Lloyd-Jones DM, Baker DW, Medical Care 2009 47 418 424 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818dce21 19238100
19. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F, BMJ 2003 326 7398 1070 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1070 12750210
20. Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trials. Ross J, Tu S, Carini S, Sim I, AMIA Summits Transl Sci Proc March 12-13, 2010 Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association 2010 46 50
21. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. Weiskopf NG, Weng C, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013 20 144 151 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681 22733976
22. Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records. van der Lei J, Methods Inf Med 1991 30 79 80 1857252
23. Measuring Diagnoses: ICD Code Accuracy. O'Malley KJ, Cook KF, Price MD, Raiford Wildes K, Hurdle JF, Ashton CM, Health Serv Res 2005 40 5 Pt 2 1620 1639 16178999 (Pubitemid 41434351)
24. A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. Campbell SE, Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM, Walker AE, J Public Health Med 2001 23 3 205 211 10.1093/pubmed/23.3.205 11585193 (Pubitemid 32895888)