Improved Differential Diagnosis of Breast Masses on Ultrasonographic Images with a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Determining Histological Classifications

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 471-477

  Kashikura, Yumi ^a   Nakayama, Ryohei ^a   Hizukuri, Akiyoshi ^a   Noro, Aya ^a   Nohara, Yuki ^a   Nakamura, Takashi ^a   Ito, Minori ^a   Kimura, Hiroko ^a   Yamashita, Masako ^a   Hanamura, Noriko ^a   Ogawa, Tomoko ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast mass; Computer aided diagnosis; Ultrasonographic image

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CYST; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; ROC CURVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84875059288     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Crystal P., Strano S.D., Shcharynski S., et al. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Roentegenol AJR 2003, 181:177-182.
2. Tohno E., Ueno E., Watanabe H. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2009, 16:18-22.
3. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008, 299:2151-2163.
4. Ying X., Lin Y., Xia X., et al. A comparison of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Breast J 2012, 18:130-138. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01219.x.
5. Tohno E., Ide S., Shibata K., et al. Occurrence of focal detection abnormalities in breast cancer screening by ultrasound. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen 2000, 9:231-236.
6. Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007, 31:198-211.
7. Jiang Y., Nishikawa R.M., Schmidt R.A., et al. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 1999, 6:22-33.
8. Timp S., Varela C., Karssemeijer N. Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 2010, 14:803-808.
9. Nakayama R., Abe H., Shiraishi J., et al. Potential usefulness of similar images in the differential diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Radiology 2009, 253:625-631.
10. Hizukuri A, Nakayama R, Kashikura Y, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for determining histological classification of breast masses using clinical features and texture features. Proc Fourth International Workshop on Regional Innovation Studies - Biomedical Engineering 2012;83-86.
11. Hizukuri A, Nakayama R, Kashikura Y, et al. Computerized quantification method for objective features based on clinicians' subjective ratings of breast masses on ultrasonographic images. Proc Third International Workshop on Regional Innovation Studies -Biomedical Engineering 2011; 33-36.
12. Dorfman D.D., Berbaum K.S., Metz C.E. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992, 27:723-731.
13. Kobayashi T., Xu X.W., MacMahon H., et al. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 1996, 199:843-848.
14. Uozumi T., Nakamura K., Watanabe H., et al. ROC analysis of detection of metastatic pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs with temporal subtraction. Acad Radiol 2001, 8:871-878.