Ultra high spatial and temporal resolution breast imaging at 7T

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 367-375

  Van de Bank, B L ^a,b   Voogt, I J ^a   Italiaander, M ^a   Stehouwer, B L ^a   Boer, V O ^a   Luijten, P R ^a   Klomp, D W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast; Dynamic Contrast Enhancement; Parallel imaging; RF receive coils; RF transmit coils

Indexed keywords

BREAST; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; PARALLEL IMAGING; RF RECEIVE COILS; RF TRANSMIT COILS;

IMAGE RESOLUTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BREAST; FEMALE; PROCEDURES; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; TIME;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIO WAVES; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84875055717     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.2868     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 2010; 127: 2893-2917.
2. Bartella L, Smith CS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Imaging breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2007; 45: 45-67.
3. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: Initial experience. Radiology 2006; 239: 666-676.
4. Moon M, Cornfeld D, Weinreb J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2009; 17: 351-362.
5. Elsamaloty H, Elzawawi MS, Mohammad S, Herial N. Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 1142-1148.
6. Peters JL, Mengersen KL. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2008; 14: 941-950.
7. American College of Radiology (ACR). BI-RADS - magnetic resonance imaging. In Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Breast Imaging Atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology: Reston, VA, 2003.
8. Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K, Nishimura T. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007; 25: 104-112.
9. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005; 236: 789-800.
10. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J, Schwerin EH, Sickles EA, Hylton NM. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000; 175: 35-43.
11. Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, Gruber S, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S, Heinz-Peer G, Weber M, Fitzal F, Pluschnig U, Rudas M, Helbich T. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions initial results. Invest. Radiol. 2009; 44: 553-558.
12. Ladd ME. High-field-strength magnetic resonance: potential and limits. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007; 18: 139-152.
13. Korteweg MA, Veldhuis WB, Visser F, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, van Diest PJ, van den Bosch MAAJ, Klomp DJ. Feasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and H-1-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Invest. Radiol. 2011; 46: 370-376.
14. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 42: 952-962.
15. Wiesinger F, Van De Moortele PF, Adriany G, De Zanche N, Ugurbil K, Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging performance as a function of field strength - An experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 52: 953-964.
16. Bammer R, Keeling SL, Augustin M, Pruessmann KP, Wolf R, Stollberger R, Hartung HP, Fazekas F. Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn. Reson. Med. 2001; 46: 548-554.
17. Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Kuroki S, Murakami K, Hayashi T, Sekiguchi R, Nawano S. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 2004; 3: 79-85.
18. Klomp DW, van de Bank BL, Raaijmakers A, Korteweg MA, Possanzini C, Boer VO, van de Berg CA, van de Bosch MA, Luijten PR. (31) P MRSI and (1) H MRS at 7 T: initial results in human breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2011; 24: 1337-1342.
19. Haase A, Odoj F, Von Kienlin M, Warnking J, Fidler F, Weisser A, Nittka M, Rommel E, Lanz T, Kalusche B, Griswold M. NMR probeheads for in vivo applications. Concepts Magn. Reson. 2000; 12: 361-388.
20. Kumar A, Edelstein WA, Bottomley PA. Noise Figure Limits for Circular Loop MR Coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61: 1201-1209.
21. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR phased array. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990; 16: 192-225.
22. Yarnykh VL. Actual flip-angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: A method for rapid three-dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 57: 192-200.
23. Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005; 54: 1439-1447.
24. Goto M, Sakuma H, Kobayashi S, Matsumura K, Takeda K. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the entire breast with spectral-selective inversion fast three dimensional sequence. MAGMA 1998; 7: 69-75.
25. Axel L, Glover G, Pelc N. Chemical-shift magnetic resonance imaging of two-line spectra by gradient reversal. Magn. Reson. Med. 1985; 2: 428-436.
26. Umutlu L, Maderwald S, Kraff O, Theysohn JM, Kuemmel S, Hauth EA, Forsting M, Antoch G, Ladd ME, Quick HH, Lauenstein TC. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI at 7 Tesla Utilizing a Single-loop Coil: A Feasibility Trial. Acad. Radiol. 2010; 17: 1050-1056.
27. Vaughan TT, Snyder CJ, DelaBarre LJ, Bolan PJ, Tian J, Bolinger L, Adriany G, Andersen P, Strupp J, Ugurbil K. Whole-Body Imaging at 7T: Preliminary Results. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61: 244-248.
28. Nnewihe AN, Grafendorfer T, Daniel BL, Calderon P, Alley MT, Robb F, Hargreaves BA. Custom-fitted 16-channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011; 66: 281-289.
29. Kumar A, Bottomley PA. Optimized quadrature surface coil designs. Magn. Reson. Mat. Phys. Biol. Med. 2008; 21: 41-52.
30. Dreher W, Bornert P. Pulse sequence and parameter choice in NMR imaging as a problem of constrained multidimensional nonlinear optimization. Magn. Reson. Med. 1988; 8: 16-24.
31. Tannus A, Garwood M. Adiabatic pulses. NMR Biomed. 1997; 10: 423-434.
32. Treier R, Steingoetter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Boesiger P. Optimized and combined T1 and B1 mapping technique for fast and accurate T1 quantification in contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 57: 568-576.
33. Sinha S, Sinha U. Recent advances in breast MRI and MRS. NMR Biomed. 2009; 22: 3-16.
34. El Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, Huang P, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256: 64-73.