Comparing media use and reception

The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 382-399

  Hasebrink, Uwe ^a,b  

^a Hans Bredow Institute for Media Research   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874982918     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203149102-33     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Ang, I. (1991). Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
2. Barker, M., & Mathijs, E. (Eds.) (2008). Watching the Lord of the Rings: Tolkien’s world audiences. New York: Peter Lang.
3. Beck, U. (2007). The cosmopolitan condition: Why methodological nationalism fails. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7-8), 286-290.
4. Cooper-Chen, A. (Ed.) (2005). Global entertainment media: Content, audiences, issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Elvestad, E., & Blekesaune, A. (2008). Newspaper readers in Europe: A multilevel study of individual and national differences. European Journal of Communication, 23(4), 425-447.
6. Ettema, J. S., & Whitney, D.C. (Eds.) (1994). Audience-making: How the media create the audience. London:SAGE.
7. Gustafsson, K. E., & Weibull, L. (1997). European newspaper readership: Structure and development. Communications, 22(3), 249-273.
8. Hasebrink, U. (2006). The audiences’ perspective on global media landscapes. In W. Urricchio & S. Kinnebrock (Eds.), Media cultures (pp. 49-60). Heidelberg, Germany: Universitätsverlag Winter.
9. Hasebrink, U., & Herzog, A. (2009). Mediennutzung im internationalen Vergleich. In Hans-Bredow-Institut (Ed.), Internationales Handbuch Medien (pp. 131-154). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
10. Hasebrink, U., Stetka, V., & Olafsson, K. (2010). Commonalities and differences. How to learn from international comparisons of children’s online behaviour. International Journal for Media and Cultural Politics, 6(1), 9-24.
11. Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Olafsson, K. (2009). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online (2nd edition). London:EU Kids Online (Deliverable D3.2).
12. Hepp, A. (2006). Transkulturelle Kommunikation. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
13. Hepp, A. (2009). Transculturality as a perspective: researching media cultures comparatively. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Article 26.
14. Internet World Stats (2010). Online available at www.Internetworldstats.com (accessed on November 13, 2010).
15. IP (2009). International key facts-Television 2009. Paris: IP.
16. ITU (2007). Digital opportunity index 2007. Online available at www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/doi/index.html (accessed on November 14, 2010).
17. ITU (2010a). World telecommunication/ICT development report 2010-Monitoring the WSIS targets. Online available at www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/wtdr_10/index.html (accessed on November 12, 2010).
18. ITU (2010b). The world in 2010: ICT facts and figures. Online available at www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/material/FactsFigures2010.pdf (accessed on November 12, 2010).
19. Jensen, K. B. (1998a). Local empiricism, global theory. Problems and potentials of comparative research on news reception. Communications, 23(4), 427-445.
20. Jensen, K. B. (Ed.) (1998b). News of the world: World cultures look at television news. London: Routledge.
21. Jowell, R. (1998). How comparative is comparative research? American Behavioral Scientist, 42(2), 168-177.
22. Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (1987). Decoding Dallas: Notes from a cross-cultural study. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Television: the critical view (pp. 419-432). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Kavoori, A. P. (1999). Discursive texts, reflexive audiences: Global trends in television news texts and audience reception. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(3), 386-398.
24. Kilborn, R. (1993). “Speak my language�?: Current attitudes to television subtitling and dubbing. Media, Culture, and Society, 15(4), 641-660.
25. Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Kohn, M. L. (1989). Introduction. In M. L. Kohn (Ed.), Cross-national research in sociology (pp. 17-31). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
27. Krotz, F. (2002). Der Umgang mit Medienangeboten in verschiedenen Kulturen. In A. Hepp & M. Löffelholz (Eds.), Grundlagentexte zur transkulturellen Kommunikation (pp. 696-722). Konstanz, Germany:UVK.
28. Krotz, F., & Hasebrink, U. (2001). Who are the new media users? In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 245-262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Lauf, E. (2001). Research note: The vanishing young reader. Sociodemographic determinants of newspaper use as a source of political information in Europe, 1980-1998. European Journal of Communication, 16(2), 233-243.
30. Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477-500.
32. Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2010). Designing a European project on children and the Internet. Reflections on comparative research in theory and practice. In L. Weibull (Ed.), Festschrift for Ulla Carlsson (pp. 135-148). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
33. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2010). Risks and safety on the Internet. The perspective of European children: Initial findings. London: EU Kids Online.
34. Lull, J. (1990). Cultural variation in family television viewing. In J. Lull (Ed.), Inside family viewing (pp. 146-173). London: Routledge.
35. Mathijs, E., & Jones, J. (Eds) (2004). Big Brother international: Formats, critics and publics. London:Wallflower Press.
36. McQuail, D. (1997). Audience Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37. Morley, D., & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of identity: Global media, electronic landscapes, and cultural boundaries. London: Routledge.
38. Morley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1990). Domestic communication-Technologies and meanings. Media, Culture & Society, 12(1), 31-57.
39. Olderaan, F., & Jankowski, N. (1989). The Netherlands: The cable replaces the antenna. In L. B. Becker & K. Schönbach (Eds.), Audience responses to media diversification-Coping with plenty (pp. 29-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Raeymaeckers, K. (2002). Research note: Young people and patterns of time consumption in relation to print media. European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 369-383.
41. Raeymaeckers, K. (2006). Readership market trends in Europe. Young readers as pivotal players in the future of newspapers. In F. Marcinkowski, W. A. Meier, & J. Trappel (Eds.), Medien und Demokratie:Europäische Erfahrungen [Media and democracy: Experiences from Europe] (pp. 59-72). Bern, Switzerland:Haupt.
42. Rosengren, K.E., Wenner, L.A., & Palmgreen, P. (Eds.) (1985). Media gratifications research: Current perspectives. London: SAGE.
43. Röser, J. (2007). MedienAlltag: Domestizierungsprozesse alter und neuer Medien. Wiesbaden, Germany:VS Verlag.
44. Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2011). A matter of context. A comparative study of media environments and news consumption gaps in Europe. Political Communication, 28(1), 110-134.
45. Silverstone, R. (1990). Television and everyday life: Towards an anthropology of the television audience. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication: The new imperatives (pp. 173-188). London: SAGE.
46. Trepte, S. (2008). Cultural proximity in TV entertainment. An eight-country study on the relationship of nationality and the evaluation of U.S. prime-time fiction. Communications-The European Journal of Communication Research, 33(1), 1-26.
47. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2010). Regional literacy rates for youths (15-24) and adults (15+). Online available at http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx (accessed on July 11, 2010).
48. WAN-World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (Ed.) (2010). World press trends 2010. Online available at www.wan-press.org/worldpresstrends2010/home.php and www.wan-press.org/article18612. html (accessed on November 13, 2010).
49. Wasko, J., Phillips, M., & Meehan, W.R. (Eds.) (2001). Dazzled by Disney? The global Disney audiences project. London: Leicester University Press.
50. Webster, J. G., & Phalen, P. (1997). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant model. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. WIP-World Internet Project (2010): World Internet Project Report 2010. Online available at www.world-Internetproject.net/_files/_News/37/wip2010_long_press_release_v2.pdf (accessed on November 13, 2010).
52. Zöllner, O. (Ed.) (2004). Beyond borders: Research for international broadcasting. Bonn, Germany: CIBAR.