The Cosmopolitan Condition: Why Methodological Nationalism Fails

Theory, Culture & Society

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 286-290

  Beck, Ulrich ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cosmopolitanism; individualization; methodological nationalism; modernity; risks

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749134763     PISSN: 02632764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02632764070240072505     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
2. Beck, U. (2005) Power in the Global Age. London : Polity Press.
3. Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge : Polity Press.
4. Beck, U. (2007) ‘Beyond Class and Nation: Reframing Social Inequalities in a Globalized World’, British Journal of Sociology, 58(4): 680—705.
5. Beck, U. and N. Sznaider (2006) ‘Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda’, British Journal of Sociology, Special Issue, 57(1).
6. Drori, G.S., J. Meyer and H. Hwang (eds) (2006) Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation, trans. and ed. M. Pensky. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
8. Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Latour, B. (2003) ‘Is Remodernization Occurring? And if So, How to Prove it? A Commentary on Ulrich Beck’, Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2): 35—48.
10. Lyotard, J-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition. Manchester : Manchester University Press (original edn 1979).
11. Parsons, T. (1971) The Systems of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Wallerstein, I. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.