The effect of iodinated contrast agent properties on renal kinetics and oxygenation

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 175-182

  Lenhard, Diana Constanze ^a   Frisk, Anna Lena ^b   Lengsfeld, Philipp ^a   Pietsch, Hubertus ^a   Jost, Gregor ^a  

^a BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

^b Medicinal Chemistry Global Drug Discovery Bayer Healthcare   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast agents; Iodine retention; Osmolality; Renal oxygenation; Urine viscosity; Vacuole formation

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL; IOPROMIDE; IOXAGLIC ACID; MANNITOL; MEGLUMINE IOXAGLATE PLUS SODIUM IOXAGLATE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGENATION; CALCULATION; CELL VACUOLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAVITY; HISTOLOGY; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY MEDULLA; KIDNEY PROXIMAL TUBULE; KIDNEY TUBULE CELL; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSMOLALITY; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84874935184     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827b70f9     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1602-1613.
2. Persson PB, Tepel M. Contrast medium-induced nephropathy: the pathophysiology. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006:S8-S10.
3. Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, et al. Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2527-2541.
4. McCullough PA. Radiocontrast-induced acute kidney injury. Nephron Physiol. 2008;109:61-72.
5. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2002; 105:2259-2264. (Pubitemid 34535335)
6. Sendeski MM. Pathophysiology of renal tissue damage by iodinated contrast media. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;38:292-299.
7. Seeliger E, Flemming B, Wronski T, et al. Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2912-2920. (Pubitemid 350058398)
8. Jost G, Lengsfeld P, Lenhard DC, et al. Viscosity of iodinated contrast agents during renal excretion. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:373-377.
9. Jost G, Lenhard DC, Sieber MA, et al. Changes of renal water diffusion coefficient after application of iodinated contrast agents: effect of viscosity. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:796-800.
10. Jost G, Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, et al. The impact of the viscosity and osmolality of iodine contrast agents on renal elimination. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:255-261.
11. Tumlin J, Stacul F, Adam A, et al. Pathophysiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:14K-20K.
12. Sendeski M, Patzak A, Persson PB. Constriction of the vasa recta, the vessels supplying the area at risk for acute kidney injury, by four different iodinated contrast media, evaluating ionic, nonionic, monomeric and dimeric agents. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:453-457.
13. Sendeski M, Patzak A, Pallone TL, et al. Iodixanol, constriction of medullary descending vasa recta, and risk for contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Radiology. 2009;251:697-704.
14. Heyman SN, Brezis M, Epstein FH, et al. Early renal medullary hypoxic injury from radiocontrast and indomethacin. Kidney Int. 1991;40:632-642.
15. Heyman SN, Khamaisi M, Rosen S, et al. Renal parenchymal hypoxia, hypoxia response and the progression of chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28:998-1006.
16. Heyman SN, Reichman J, Brezis M. Pathophysiology of radiocontrast nephropathy: a role for medullary hypoxia. Invest Radiol. 1999;34:685-691. (Pubitemid 29506070)
17. Heyman SN, Rosen S, Brezis M. Radiocontrast nephropathy: a paradigm for the synergism between toxic and hypoxic insults in the kidney. Exp Nephrol. 1994;2:153-157. (Pubitemid 24134044)
18. Lenhard DC, Pietsch H, Sieber MA, et al. The osmolality of nonionic, iodinated contrast agents as an important factor for renal safety. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47:503-510.
19. Seeliger E, Sendeski M, Rihal CS, et al. Contrast-induced kidney injury: mechanisms, risk factors, and prevention. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2007-2015.
20. Meier P, Ko DT, Tamura A, et al. Sodium bicarbonate-based hydration prevents contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2009;7:23.
21. Solomon R. Preventing contrast-induced nephropathy: problems, challenges and future directions. BMC Med. 2009;7:24.
22. Ide JM, Lancelot E, Pines E, et al. Prophylaxis of iodinated contrast mediainduced nephropathy: a pharmacological point of view. Invest Radiol. 2004; 39:155-170. (Pubitemid 38263922)
23. Ladwig M, Flemming B, Seeliger E, et al. Renal effects of bicarbonate versus saline infusion for iso- and lowosmolar contrast media in rats. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:672-677.
24. Persson PB, Patzak A. Renal haemodynamic alterations in contrast mediuminduced nephropathy and the benefit of hydration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(suppl 1):i2-i5. (Pubitemid 40372640)
25. Ramponi S, Grotti A, Morisetti A, et al. Effects of iodinated contrast media on endothelium: an in vitro study. Toxicol In Vitro. 2007;21:191-196. (Pubitemid 46205087)
26. Hizoh I, Strater J, Schick CS, et al. Radiocontrast-induced DNA fragmentation of renal tubular cells in vitro: role of hypertonicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:911-918. (Pubitemid 28161763)
27. Heinrich MC, Kuhlmann MK, Grgic A, et al. Cytotoxic effects of ionic highosmolar, nonionic monomeric, and nonionic iso-osmolar dimeric iodinated contrast media on renal tubular cells in vitro. Radiology. 2005;235:843-849. (Pubitemid 40695879)
28. Seeliger E, Becker K, Ladwig M, et al. Up to 50-fold increase in urine viscosity with iso-osmolar contrast media in the rat. Radiology. 2010;256:406-414.
29. Jost G, Pietsch H, Sommer J, et al. Retention of iodine and expression of biomarkers for renal damage in the kidney after application of iodinated contrast media in rats. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:114-123.
30. Seeliger E, Ladwig M, Sargsyan L, et al. Proof of principle: hydration by lowosmolar mannitol-glucose solution alleviates undesirable renal effects of an iso-osmolar contrast medium in rats. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:240-246.
31. Nordby A, Tvedt KE, Halgunset J, et al. Intracellular penetration and accumulation of radiographic contrast media in the rat kidney. Scanning Microsc. 1990;4:651-664.
32. Maunsbach AB, Madden SC, Latta H. Light and electron microscopic changes in proximal tubules of rats after administration of glucose, mannitol, sucrose, or dextran. Lab Invest. 1962;11:421-432.
33. Dickenmann M, Oettl T, Mihatsch MJ. Osmotic nephrosis: acute kidney injury with accumulation of proximal tubular lysosomes due to administration of exogenous solutes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:491-503. (Pubitemid 351273478)
34. Lee HT, Jan M, Bae SC, et al. A1 adenosine receptor knockout mice are protected against acute radiocontrast nephropathy in vivo. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F1367-F1375. (Pubitemid 43830761)
35. Heinrich MC. Osmotic nephrosis and contrast media. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 52:629.
36. LineaweaverW, McMorris S, Soucy D, et al. Cellular and bacterial toxicities of topical antimicrobials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:394-396. (Pubitemid 15143599)
37. Laissy JP, Menegazzo D, Dumont E, et al. Hemodynamic effect of iodinated high-viscosity contrast medium in the rat kidney: a diffusion-weighted MRI feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:647-652.
38. Smedby O. Viscosity of some contemporary contrast media before and after mixing with whole blood. Acta Radiol. 1992;33:600-605.
39. Liss P, Nygren A, Erikson U, et al. Injection of low and iso-osmolar contrast medium decreases oxygen tension in the renal medulla. Kidney Int. 1998;53:698-702. (Pubitemid 28124285)
40. Lancelot E, Idee JM, Lacledere C, et al. Effects of two dimeric iodinated contrast media on renal medullary blood perfusion and oxygenation in dogs. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:368-375. (Pubitemid 34680197)
41. Haneder S, Augustin J, Jost G, et al. Impact of iso- and low-osmolar iodinated contrast agents on BOLD and diffusion MRI in swine kidneys. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:299-305.
42. Liss P, Nygren A, Ulfendahl HR, et al. Effect of furosemide or mannitol before injection of a non-ionic contrast medium on intrarenal oxygen tension. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;471:353-359. (Pubitemid 32197867)
43. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010;256:32-61.
44. U.S. Department of Health and Human Devices FaDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Estimating the maximum safe starting dose in clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers. Available at: http://www. fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm. Accessed 2005.
45. Manz F, Wentz A. 24-h hydration status: parameters, epidemiology and recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(suppl 2):S10-S18. (Pubitemid 38159623)
46. Bozinovic F, Gallardo P. The water economy of South American desert rodents: from integrative to molecular physiological ecology. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;142:163-172.