The Evolution of the Exponent of Zipf's Law in Language Ontogeny

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Baixeries, Jaume ^a   Elvevåg, Brita ^b,c   Ferrer i Cancho, Ramon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPEECH;

EID: 84874891971     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053227     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Zipf GK (1949) Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Cambridge (MA), USA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Mandelbrot B (1961) On the theory of word frequencies and on related markovian models of discourse. In: Jacobson R, editor, Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, Providence, R. I.:American Mathematical Society.pp.190-219.
3. Nowak MA, Plotkin JB, Jansen VA, (2000) The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature 404: 495-498.
4. Ferrer i Cancho R, Solé RV, (2003) Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 788-791.
5. Wimmer G, Altmann G (1999) Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions. Germany: STAMM Verlag.
6. Nowak MA, (2000) The basic reproductive ratio of a word, the maximum the size of a lexicon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204: 179-189.
7. Plotkin JB, Nowak MA, (2001) Major transitions in language evolution. Entropy 3: 227-246.
8. Corominas-Murtra B, Valverde SV, Solé R, (2009) The ontogeny of scale-free syntax networks: phase transitions in early language acquisition. Advances in Complex Systems 12: 371-392.
9. Saxton M (2010) Child language. Acquisition and development. Los Angeles: SAGE.
10. Ferrer i Cancho R, (2006) When language breaks into pieces. A conict between communication through isolated signals and language. Biosystems 84: 242-253.
11. Ferrer i Cancho R, Riordan O, Bollobás B, (2005) The consequences of Zipf's law for syntax and symbolic reference. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272: 561-565.
12. Piotrowski RG, Pashkovskii VE, Piotrowski VR, (1995) Psychiatric linguistics and automatic text processing. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 28: 28-35.
13. Piotrowski RG, Spivak DL (2007) Linguistic disorders and pathologies: synergetic aspects. In: Grzybek P, Köhler R, editors, Exact methods in the study of language and text. To honor Gabriel Altmann, Berlin: Gruyter.pp.545-554.
14. McCowan B, Doyle LR, Hanser SF, (2002) Using information theory to assess the diversity, complexity and development of communicative repertoires. Journal of Comparative Psychology 116: 166-172.
15. Miller DW (1995) Fitting frequency distributions: philosophy and practice. Volume I: discrete distributions. New York: Book Resource.
16. Goldstein ML, Morris SA, Yen GG, (2004) Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. Eur Phys J B 41: 255-258.
17. Rescorla L, Alley A, Christine JB, (2001) Word frequencies in toddlers' lexicons. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44: 598-609.
18. Howes D, Geschwind N (1964) Quantitative studies of aphasic language. In: Rioch D, Weinstein E, editors, Disorders of communication, Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins.pp.229-244.
19. Baayen RH (2001) Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Bernhardsson S, Correa da Rocha LE, Minnhagen P, (2009) The meta book and size-dependent properties of written language. New Journal of Physics 11: 123015.
21. Ferrer i Cancho R, Solé RV, (2001) Two regimes in the frequency of words and the origin of complex lexicons: Zipf's law revisited. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 165-173.
22. Bates E, Dale PS, Thal D (1995) Individual differences and its implications. In: Handbook of child language, Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 86-151.
23. MacWhinney B (2000) The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk, volume 2: the database.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3rd edition.
24. Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: Wiley. 3rd edition.
25. Montemurro MA, Zanette D, (2002) Frequency-rank distribution in large samples: phenomenology and models. Glottometrics 4: 87-98.
26. White EP, Enquist BJ, Green JL, (2008) On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions. Ecology 89: 905-912.
27. Ferrer i Cancho R (2008) Network theory.In: P Colm Hogan P, editor, The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, Cambridge University Press. pp.555-557.
28. Reich PA (1986) Language development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
29. Castro Sotos A, Vanhoof S, Van den Noortgate W, Onghena P (2007) The non-transitivity of Pearson's correlation coefficient: an educational perspective.In: Gomes I, Pinto Martines J, Silva J, editors, Bulletin of the ISI. Proceedings of the 56th Session of the ISI: Vol. 62. Session of the International Statistical Institute.Lisbon, Portugal, pp.4609-4613.
30. Li W, Miramontes P, Cocho G, (2010) Fitting ranked linguistic data with two-parameter functions. Entropy 12: 1743-1764.
31. Bol GW (1995) Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: The order of production of Dutch verb constructions. In: Verrips M, Wijnen F, editors, Amsterdam series in child language development: Vol. 3. Papers from the Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition, Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics. pp. 1-13.
32. Schaerlaekens AM (1973) The two-word sentence in child language. The Hague: Mouton.
33. Van Kampen J (1994) The learnability of the left branch condition. In: Bok-Bennema R, Cremers C, editors, Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp.83-94.
34. Rowland CF, Fletcher SL, (2006) The efiect of sampling on estimates of lexical specificity and error rates. Journal of Child Language 33: 859-877.
35. Theakston AL, Lieven EVM, Pine JM, Rowland CF, (2001) The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. Journal of Child Language 28: 127-152.
36. Wells CG (1981) Learning through interaction: the study of language development.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
37. Bloom L, Hood L, Lightbown P, (1974) Imitation in language development: If, when and why. Cognitive Psychology 6: 380-420.
38. Bloom L, Lightbown P, Hood L, Bowerman M, Maratsos M, et al. (1975) Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (Serial no 160) 40: 1-97.
39. Bloom L (1970) Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
40. Brown R (1973) A first language: the early stages.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
41. Kuczaj S, (1977) The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16: 589-600.
42. American English Corpora. CHILDES. The Database Manuals. Available: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/02englishusa.doc.Accessed 2012 Dec 17.
43. Demuth K, Culbertson J, Alter J, (2006) Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language and Speech 49: 137-174.
44. Sachs J (1983) Talking about the there and then: the emergence of displaced reference in parentchild discourse.In: Children's language, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, volume 4. pp. 1-28.
45. Suppes P, (1974) The semantics of children's language. American Psychologist 29: 103-114.
46. Germanic Corpora. CHILDES. The Database Manuals. Available: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/07germanic.doc.Accessed 2012 Dec 17.
47. Behrens H, (2006) The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21: 2-24.
48. Szagun G, (2001) Learning different regularities: The acquisition of noun plurals by Germanspeaking children. First Language 21: 109-141.
49. Plunkett K, Strömqvist S (1992) The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. In: Slobin DI, editor, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Volume 3, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp.457-556.
50. Strömqvist S, Richthoff U, Andersson AB (1993) Strömqvist's and Richthoff's corpora: a guide to longitudinal data from four Swedish children. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 66.
51. CHILDES. The Database Manuals. Available: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/.Accessed 2012 Dec 17.
52. British English Corpora. CHILDES. The Database Manuals. Available: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/03englishuk.doc.Accessed 2012 Dec 17.
53. Snow CE (1995) Issues in the study of input: fine-tuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes.In: Handbook of child language, Oxford: Blackwell. pp.180-193.
54. Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J, Zhu C, (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 16: 1190-1208.
55. Ferrer-i-Cancho R, Hernández-Fernández A (2012) The failure of the law of brevity in two New World primates. Statistical caveats. Glottotheory 4.
56. Rice JA (2007) Mathematical statistics and data analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury. 3rd edition.