An intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator based methodology for environmental criteria integrated supplier evaluation process

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 423-432

  Tuzkaya, G ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fuzzy sets; Multi criteria decision making; Supplier selection; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

DECISION ENVIRONMENT; DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY; DELIVERY RELIABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY VALUES; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS; SUPPLIER SELECTION;

FUZZY SETS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84874863440     PISSN: 17351472     EISSN: 17352630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0180-9     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amid A, Godsypour SH, O'Brien C (2006) Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 104: 394-407.
2. Ashayeri J, Tuzkaya G, Tuzkaya UR (2012) Supply chain partners and configuration selection: an intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator based approach. Expert Syst Appl 39(3): 3642-3649.
3. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20: 87-96.
4. Atanassov K (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
5. Awasti A, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 126: 370-378.
6. Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J Clean Prod 18: 1200-1210.
7. Bi{dotless}yi{dotless}k G, Kongar E, Gülsün B (2005) A supplier selection methodology for an effective supply chain. International logistics and supply chain congress, Istanbul.
8. Büyüközkan G, Ruan D (2010) Choquet integral based aggregation approach to software development risk assessment. Inf Sci 180(3): 441-451.
9. Büyüközkan G, Feyzioǧlu O, Ersoy MŞ (1999) Evaluation of 4PL operating models: a decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral. Int J Prod Econ 121: 112-120.
10. Chen SM, Tan JM (1994) Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 67: 163-172.
11. Choquet G (1953) Theory of capacities. Annales de l'institut Fourier 5: 131-295.
12. de Boer L, Wegen L, Telgen J (1998) Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 4: 109-118.
13. de Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P (2001) A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 7(2): 75-89.
14. Degraeve Z, Labro E, Roodhooft F (2000) An evaluation of supplier selection methods from a total cost of ownership perspective. Eur J Oper Res 125(1): 34-58.
15. Demirel T, Demirel NÇ, Kahraman C (2010) Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Syst Appl 37(5): 3943-3952.
16. Ghodsypour SH, O'Brien C (1998) A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Int J Prod Econ 56-57: 199-212.
17. Grabisch M (1995) Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 69: 279-298.
18. Grabisch M (1997) K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 92: 167-189.
19. Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA (2002) Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 141: 70-87.
20. Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202: 16-24.
21. Hong DJ, Choi CH (2010) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114: 103-113.
22. Hsu C-W, Hu AH (2009) Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytical network process. J Clean Prod 17: 255-264.
23. Hu Y-C, Chen H-C (2010) Choquet integral-based hierarchical networks for evaluating customer service perceptions on fast food stores. Expert Syst Appl 37(12): 7880-7887.
24. Humphreys P, McIvor R, Chan F (2003a) Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Syst Appl 25: 141-153.
25. Humphreys P, Wong YK, Chan FTS (2003b) Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J Mater Process Technol 138(1): 349-356.
26. Humphreys P, McCloskey A, McIvor R, Maguire L, Glackin A (2006) Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. Int J Prod Res 44(12): 2379-2419.
27. Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18: 1161-1170.
28. Lee AHI, Kang H-Y, Hsu C-F, Hung H-C (2009) A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl 36: 7917-7927.
29. Lu LYY, Wu CH, Kuo TC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective. Int J Prod Res 45(18-19): 4317-4331.
30. Marichal J-L, Roubens M (2000) Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. Eur J Oper Res 124: 641-650.
31. Nakashima K, Nose T, Kuriyama S (2006) A new approach to environmental performance evaluation. Int J Prod Res 44(18-19): 4137-4143.
32. Noci G (1997) Designing "green" vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier's environmental performance. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 3(2): 103-114.
33. Ozgen D, Onut S, Gulsun B, Tuzkaya UR, Tuzkaya G (2008) A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Inf Sci 178(2): 485-500.
34. Saad I, Hammadi S, Benrejeb M, Borne P (2008) Choquet integral for multi criteria aggregation in the flexible job-shop scheduling problems. Math Comput Simul 76(5-6): 447-462.
35. Sean RF (2010) Restricting weights in supplier selection decisions in the presence of dual-role factors. Appl Math Model 34: 2820-2830.
36. Tan C, Chen X (2010) Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making. Expert Syst Appl 37: 149-157.
37. Torra V (2003) Information fusion in data mining. Springer, Berlin.
38. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2007) Modelling decisions-information fusion and aggregation oprators. Springer, Berlin.
39. Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP (2006) Environmental principles applicable to supply chain design and operation. J Clean Prod 14: 1593-1602.
40. Tuzkaya G, Gülsün B (2008) Evaluating centralized return centers in a reverse logistics network: an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(3): 339-352.
41. Tuzkaya G, Önüt S, Tuzkaya UR, Gülsün B (2008) An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. J Environ Manag 88(4): 970-983.
42. Tuzkaya G, Özgen A, Özgen D, Tuzkaya UR (2009) Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi criteria decision approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6(3): 477-490.
43. Tzeng G-H, Ou Yang Y-P, Lin C-T, Chen C-B (2005) Hierarchical MADM with fuzzy integral for evaluating enterprise intranet web sites. Inf Sci 169: 409-426.
44. Valluri A, Croson DC (2003) Agent learning in supplier selection models. Decis Support Syst 39(2): 219-240.
45. Verma R, Pulman ME (1998) An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega Int J Manag Sci 26: 739-750.
46. Wang G, Huang SH, Dismukes JP (2004) Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology. Int J Prod Econ 91(1): 1-15.
47. Weber CA, Current JR, Benton WC (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur J Oper Res 50(1): 2-18.
48. Xu Z (2010) Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci 180: 726-736.
49. Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators. Knowl Based Syst 24: 197-209.
50. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8: 338-353.
51. Zadeh LA (2005) Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)-an outline. Inf Sci 172: 1-40.
52. Zadeh LA (2008) Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Inf Sci 178: 2751-2779.