Accuracy of cystatin C-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 741-757

  Harman, Gavin ^a   Akbari, Ayub ^a,b   Hiremath, Swapnil ^a,b   White, Christine A ^c   Ramsay, Tim ^b   Kokolo, Madzouka B ^b   Craig, Jeffery ^a   Knoll, Greg A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cystatin C; Glomerular filtration rate; Kidney transplantation

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; CYSTATIN C; EDETATE CHROMIUM CR 51; IOHEXOL; IOTALAMIC ACID I 125; PENTETATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DRUG CLEARANCE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; INULIN CLEARANCE; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; KIDNEY SCINTISCANNING; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; NEPHELOMETRY; PLASMA CLEARANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TURBIDIMETRY;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CYSTATIN C; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PROGNOSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC;

EID: 84874846139     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs498     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Grubb AO. Cystatin C - properties and use as diagnostic marker. Adv Clin Chem 2000; 35: 63-99
2. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J kidney Dis 2002; 40: 221-226
3. Seronie-Vivien S, Delanaye P, Pieroni L et al. Cystatin C: current position and future prospects. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46: 1664-1686
4. White C, Akbari A, Hussain N et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 3763-3770
5. Zahran A, Qureshi M, Shoker A. Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 2659-2668
6. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2009; 3: S1-S155
7. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3: 25
8. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-634
9. Maillard N, Mariat C, Bonneau C et al. Cystatin C-based equations in renal transplantation: moving toward a better glomerular filtration rate prediction? Transplantation 2008; 85: 1855-1858
10. Poge U, Gerhardt T, Stoffel-Wagner B et al. Cystatin C-based calculation of glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 204-210
11. Poge U, Gerhardt T, Woitas RP. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate using serum cystatin C in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 1878-1879
12. Poge U, Gerhardt T, Woitas RP. Equations to estimate GFR using serum cystatin C in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 52: 383-384
13. Qutb A, Syed G, Tamim HM et al. Cystatin C-based formula is superior to MDRD, Cockcroft-Gault and Nankivell formulae in estimating the glomerular filtration rate in renal allografts. Exp Clin Transplant 2009; 7: 197-202
14. Risch L, Huber AR. Assessing glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients by estimates derived from serum measurements of creatinine and cystatin C. Clin Chim Acta 2005; 356: 204-211
15. White C, Akbari A, Hussain N et al. Chronic kidney disease stage in renal transplantation classification using cystatin C and creatinine-based equations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 3013-3020
16. Yeo Y, Han DJ, Moon DH et al. Suitability of the IDMS-traceable MDRD equation method to estimate GFR in early postoperative renal transplant recipients. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 114: c108-c117
17. Larsson A, Malm J, Grubb A et al. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min from plasma cystatin C values in mg/L. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2004; 64: 25-30
18. Filler G, Lepage N. Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18: 981-985
19. Hoek FJ, Kemperman FAW, Krediet RT. A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 2024-2031
20. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM et al. Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations. Kidney Int 2006; 69: 399-405
21. Le Bricon T, Thervet E, Froissart M et al. Plasma cystatin C is superior to 24-h creatinine clearance and plasma creatinine for estimation of glomerular filtration rate 3 months after kidney transplantation. Clin Chem 2000; 46: 1206-1207
22. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH et al. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3, 418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 395-406
23. Grubb A, Bjork J, Lindstrom V et al. A cystatin C-based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rate better than creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft- Gault formula. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005; 65: 153-162
24. Beauvieux MC, Le Moigne F, Lasseur C et al. New predictive equations improve monitoring of kidney function in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1988-1994
25. Macisaac RJ, Tsalamandris C, Thomas MC et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in diabetes: a comparison of cystatin-Cand creatinine-based methods. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 1686-1689
26. Sjostrom P, Tidman M, Jones I. Determination of the production rate and non-renal clearance of cystatin C and estimation of the glomerular filtration rate from the serum concentration of cystatin C in humans. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005; 65: 111-124
27. Delanaye P, Cavalier E, Krzesinski JM et al. Cystatin C-based equations: don't repeat the same errors with analytical considerations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 1065-1066
28. White CA, Huang D, Akbari A et al. Performance of creatininebased estimates of GFR in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 1005-1015
29. White CA, Akbari A, Doucette S et al. Effect of clinical variables and immunosuppression on serum cystatin C and beta-trace protein in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 54: 922-930
30. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T et al. Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels. Kidney Int 2009; 75: 652-660
31. Rehling M, Moller ML, Thamdrup B et al. Simultaneous measurement of renal clearance and plasma clearance of 99mTc-labelled diethylenetriaminepenta- acetate, 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate and inulin in man. Clin Sci 1984; 66: 613-619
32. Morton KA, Pisani DE, Whiting JHJ et al. Determination of glomerular filtration rate using technetium-99m-DTPA with differing degrees of renal function. J Nucl Med Technol 1997; 25: 110-114
33. Delanaye P, Pieroni L, Abshoff C et al. Analytical study of three cystatin C assays and their impact on cystatin C-based GFR-prediction equations. Clin Chim Acta 2008; 398: 118-124
34. Hossain MA, Emara M, El Moselhi H et al. Comparing measures of cystatin C in human sera by three methods. Am J Nephrol 2009; 29: 381-391
35. White CA, Rule AD, Collier CP et al. The impact of interlaboratory differences in cystatin C assay measurement on glomerular filtration rate estimation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 2150-2156
36. Blirup-Jensen S, Grubb A, Lindstrom V et al. Standardization of Cystatin C: development of primary and secondary reference preparations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 2008; 241: 67-70
37. Grubb A, Blirup-Jensen S, Lindstrom V et al. First certified reference material for cystatin C in human serum ERM-DA471/ IFCC. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010; 48: 1619-1621
38. Inker LA, Eckfeldt J, Levey AS et al. Expressing the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) cystatin C equations for estimating GFR with standardized serum cystatin C values. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58: 682-684
39. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: S1-S266
40. Botev R, Mallie JP, Wetzels JFM et al. The clinician and estimation of glomerular filtration rate by creatinine-based formulas: current limitations and quo vadis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 937-950
41. Murata K, Baumann NA, Saenger AK et al. Relative performance of the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate among patients with varied clinical presentations. Clinical J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 1963-1972
42. White CA, Akbari A, Doucette S et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: is the new chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation any better? Clin Chem 2010; 56: 474-477
43. Pouteil-Noble C, Maiza H, Remontet L. Post-transplant glomerular filtration rate as a marker for long-term outcome. Ann transplant 2000; 5: 29-36
44. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13