Cystatin C-based equations: Don't repeat the same errors with analytical considerations

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1065-

  Delanaye, Pierre ^a   Cavalier, Etienne ^a   Krzesinski, Jean Marie ^a   Mariat, Christophe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYSTATIN C; CREATININE; CYSTATIN;

CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; IMMUNOASSAY; IMMUNONEPHELOMETRIC IMMUNOASSAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LETTER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PARTICLE ENHANCED IMMUNOTURBIDIMETRIC IMMUNOASSAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; TURBIDIMETRY; BLOOD; BLOOD ANALYSIS; KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY;

BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CREATININE; CYSTATINS; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; IMMUNOASSAY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS;

EID: 42449084602     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm832     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Zahran A, Qureshi M, Shoker A. Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 2659-2668
2. Finney H, Newman DJ, Gruber W et al. Initial evaluation of cystatin C measurement by particle-enhanced immunonephelometry on the Behring nephelometer systems (BNA, BN II). Clin Chem 1997; 43: 1016-1022
3. Newman DJ, Cystatin C. Ann Clin Biochem 2002; 39: 89-104
4. Delanaye P, Cavalier E, Krzesinski JM et al. Why the MDRD equation should not be used in patients with normal renal function (and normal creatinine values)? Clin Nephrol 2006; 66: 147-148
5. Borrows R, Cockwell P. Measuring renal function in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 2007; 83: 529-531