Revisiting the branch plant syndrome: Review of literature on foreign direct investment and regional development in Western advanced economies

International Journal of Urban Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 243-259

  Sonn, Jung Won ^a   Lee, Dongheon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Branch plant syndromes; Foreign direct investment; Job creation; Multinational corporations; Multinational enterprises; Regional development; Spillovers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874803688     PISSN: 12265934     EISSN: 21616779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2012.733589     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89, 605-618.
2. Amin, A., Bradley, D., Howells, J., Tomaney, J., & Gentle, C. (1994). Regional incentives and the quality of mobile investment in the less favoured regions of the EC. Progress in Planning, 41(1), 1-112.
3. Atzeni, G. E., & Carboni, O. A. (2008). The effects of grant policy on technology investment in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(3), 381-399.
4. Barrios, S., Bertinelli, L., & Strobl, E. (2006). Coagglomeration and spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 467-481.
5. Barrios, S., Görg, H., &Strobl, E. (2006). Multinationals' location choice, agglomeration economies, and public incentives. International Regional Science Review, 29(1), 81-107. doi: 10.1177/0160017605281516
6. Bathelt, H., & Gräf, A. (2008). Internal and external dynamics of the Munich film and TV industry cluster, and limitations to future growth. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1944- 1965.
7. Belderbos, R., & Capannelli, G. (2001). Backward vertical linkages of foreign manufacturing affiliates: Evidence from Japanese multinationals. World Development, 29(1), 189-208.
8. Bergek, A., & Berggren, C. (2004). Technological internationalisation in the electro-technical industry: A cross-company comparison of patenting patterns 1986-2000. Research Policy, 33, 1285-1306.
9. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Young, S. (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14, 227-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.010
10. Blomström, M., Kokko, A., & Zejan, M. (2000). Foreign direct investment: Firm and host country strategies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Bobonis, G. J., & Shatz, H. J. (2007). Agglomeration, adjustment, and state policies in the location of foreign direct investment in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 30-43.
12. Britton, J. N. (1976). The influence of corporate organization and ownership on the linages of industrial plants: A Canadian enquiry. Economic Geography, 52, 311-324.
13. Brown, R., & Raines, P. (2000). The changing nature of foreign investment policy in Europe: From promotion to management. In J. H. Dunning (Ed.), Regions, Globalization and the Knowledge-based Economy (pp. 106-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Cambridge Economic Consultants. (1993). Regional Selective Assistance 1985-88. London: HMSO.
15. Cantwell, J. (2009). Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 35-41.
16. Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1993)Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
17. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.
18. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2000). A note on the relation between size, ownership status and plants closure: Sunk costs vs. strategic size liability. Economics Letters, 69, 421-427.
19. Cooke, P., Price, A., & Morgan, K. (1995). Regulating regional economies: Wales and Baden-Wurttemberg in transition. In M. Rhodes (Ed.), The regions and the new Europe: Patterns in core and periphery development (pp. 105-135). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20. Criscuolo, P. (2003). Reverse technology transfer: A patent citation analysis of the European chemical and pharmaceutical sectors. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, No. 107. University of Sussex.
21. Crone, M. (2002). Local sourcing by multinational enterprise plants: Evidence from the UK regions and the implications for policy. Environment and Planning C, 20(1), 131-150.
22. Crone, M., & Watts, H. D. (2000). MNE supply linkages and the local SME sector: Evidence from Yorkshire and Humberside. Local Economy, 15, 325-337. doi: 10.1080/ 02690940010010783
23. Crone, M., & Watts, H. D. (2003). The determinants of regional sourcing by multinational manufacturing firms: Evidence from Yorkshire and Humberside, UK. European Planning Studies, 11, 717-737.
24. Crozet, M., Mayer, T., & Mucchielli, J. L. (2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(1), 27-54.
25. Dalton, D. H., Serapio, M. G., & Yoshida, P. G. (1999). Globalizing industrial research and development. US Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy.
26. De Propris, L., & Driffield, N. (2006). The importance of clusters for spillovers from foreign direct investment and technology sourcing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 277-291.
27. Devereux, M., Griffith, R., & Simpson, H. (2007). Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 413-435.
28. Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29. Dimitropoulou, D., Burke, S., & McCann, P. (2008). Multinational investment in UK regions. In C. Tamá sy & M. Taylor (Eds.), Globalising Worlds and New Economic Configurations(pp. 57-72). Surrey: Ashgate.
30. Driffield, N. (2004). Regional policy and spillovers from FDI in the UK. The Annals of Regional Science, 38, 579-594. doi: 10.1007/s00168-003-0174-5
31. Driffield, N. (2006). On the search for spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI) with spatial dependency. Regional Studies, 40(1), 107-119.
32. Firn, J. R. (1975). External control and regional development: The case of Scotland. Environment and Planning A, 7, 393-414.
33. Forsyth, D. J. C., & Docherty, K. (1972). US investment in Scotland. New York: Praeger.
34. Fuller, C., & Phelps, N. (2004). Multinational enterprises, Repeat investment and the role of aftercare services in Wales and Ireland. Regional Studies, 38, 783-801. doi: 10.1080/ 0034340042000265269
35. Gabe, T. M., & Kraybill, D. S. (2002). The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments. Journal of Regional Science, 42, 703-730. doi: 10.1111/1467-9787.00278
36. Girma, S., & Gö rg, H. (2005). Foreign direct investment, spillovers and absorptive capacity: Evidence from quantile regression Kiel Working Paper No. 1248, Kiel Institute for World Economics.
37. Girma, S., Greenaway, D., & Wakelin, K. (2001). Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48, 119-133. doi: 10.1111/1467-9485.00189
38. Girma, S., & Wakelin, K. (2002). Are there regional spillovers from FDI in the UK? In D. Greenaway, R. Upward & K. Wakelin (Eds.), Trade, investment, migration and labour market adjustment (pp. 172-186). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Girma, S., & Wakelin, K. (2007). Local productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment in the UK electronics industry. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 399-412.
40. Gö rg, H., &Ruane, F. (2001). Multinational companies and linkages: Panel-data evidence for the Irish electronics sector. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/13571510151075215
41. Government of Canada. (1972). Foreign direct investment in Canada. Ottawa: Information Canada.
42. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Simpson, H. (2002). Productivity convergence and foreign ownership at the establishment level. IFS Working Papers WP02/22, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
43. Hallwood, P. (1986). The offshore oil supply industry in Aberdeen: The affiliates, their characteristics and importance. North Sea Study Occasional Paper No. 23. Department of Political Economy, University of Aberdeen.
44. Hansen, M. W., Pedersen, T., & Petersen, B. (2009). MNC strategies and linkage effects in developing countries. Journal of World Business, 44(2), 121-130. doi: 10.1016/ j.jwb.2008.05.002
45. Harris, A. H., Lloyd, M. G., & Newlands, D. A. (1988). The impact of oil on the Aberdeen economy. Aldershot: Avebury.
46. Harris, R., & Robinson, C. (2004). Industrial policy in Great Britain and its effect on total factor productivity in manufacturing plants, 1990-1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51, 528-543.
47. Harris, R., & Trainor, M. (2005). Capital subsidies and their impact on total factor productivity: Firm-level evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Science, 45, 49-74.
48. Haskel, J. E., Pereira, S. C., & Slaughter, M. J. (2007). Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 482-496.
49. Hayter, R. (1982). Truncation, the international firm and regional policy. Area, 14, 277-282.
50. Head, K., Ries, J., & Swenson, D. (1995). Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 38(3-4), 223-247.
51. Head, K., Ries, J., & Swenson, D. (1999). Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, 197-218.
52. Hewitt-Dundas, N., Andréosso-O'callaghan, B., Crone, M., Murray, J., &Roper, S. (2005). Selling global, buying local? What determines the sourcing patterns of multinational plants in Ireland? Regional Studies, 39, 225-239.
53. Holland, S. (1976). Capital versus the regions. London: Macmillan.
54. Hood, N., & Young, S. (1976). US investment in Scotland-aspects of the branch factory syndrome. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 23, 279-294. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9485.1976.tb00781.x
55. Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic forms? In search of spillover through backward linkage. American Economic Review, 94, 605-627.
56. Javorcik, B. S., & Spatareanu, M. (2008). To share or not to share: Does local participation matter for spillovers from foreign direct investment? Journal of Development Economics, 85(1-2), 194-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.08.005
57. Jones, J., & Wren, C. (2004). Inward foreign direct investment and employment: A projectbased analysis in north-east England. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(5), 517-543.
58. Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43, 279-293.
59. LeRoy, G. (2005). The great American jobs scam: Corporate tax dodging and the myth of job creation. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
60. Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the "new regionalism" (illustrated from the case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 379-395. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00202
61. MacKinnon, D., & Phelps, N. (2001). Regional governance and foreign direct investment: The dynamics of institutional change in Wales and north east England. Geoforum, 32, 255-269.
62. MacLeod, G. (2001). New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization and the remaking of Political Economic Space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(4), 804-829.
63. Markusen, A. R. (2007). Reining in the competition for capital. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
64. Marshall, H., Southard, F., & Taylor, K. W. (1936). Canadian-American Industry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65. Massey, D. B. (1984). Spatial divisions of labor: Social structures and the geography of production. New York, NY: Methuen.
66. McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. (2005). Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1857-1876.
67. McDermott, P. J. (1976). Ownership, organization and regional dependence in the Scottish electronics industry. Regional Studies, 10, 319-335.
68. McDonald, F., Tüselmann, H. J., Heise, A., & Williams, D. (2003). Employment in host regions and foreign direct investment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21, 687-701.
69. McDonald, F., Tüselmann, H. J., Voronkova, S., & Dimitratos, P. (2005). The strategic development of foreign-owned subsidiaries and direct employment in host locations in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23, 867- 882.
70. McDonald, F., Warhurst, S., & Allen, M. (2008). Autonomy, embeddedness, and the performance of foreign owned subsidiaries. Multinational Business Review, 16(3), 73-92.
71. Morgan, K. (1991). Competition and collaboration in electronics: what are the prospects for Britain? Environment and Planning A, 23, 1459-1482.
72. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491-505.
73. Morris, J., Munday, M., & Wilkinson, B. (1993). Working for the Japanese. London: Athlone.
74. Munday, M. (2000). Foreign direct investment in Wales: Lifeline or leash? In J. Bryan & C. Jones (Eds.), Wales in the 21st century (Vol. 39, pp. 214-223). London: Macmillan.
75. Oakey, R., Thwaites, A., & Nash, P. (1982). Technological change and regional development: Some evidence on regional variations in product and process innovation. Environment and Planning A, 14, 1073-1086.
76. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world's technology: An important case of "non-globalisation". Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 1- 21.
77. Peck, F. (1996). Regional development and the production of space: The role of infrastructure in the attraction of new inward investment. Environment and Planning A, 28, 327-339.
78. Perrons, D. (2004). Globalization and social change: People and places in a divided world. London: Routledge.
79. Phelps, N. A. (1993). Branch plants and the evolving spatial division of labour: A study of material linkage change in the northern region of England. Regional Studies, 27(2), 87-101.
80. Phelps, N. A. (2008). Cluster or capture? Manufacturing foreign direct investment, external economies and agglomeration. Regional Studies, 42, 457-473.
81. Phelps, N. A., & Fuller, C. (2000). Multinationals, intracorporate competition, and regional development. Economic Geography, 76(3), 224-243.
82. Phelps, N. A., Mackinnon, D., Stone, I., & Braidford, P. (2003). Embedding the multinationals? Institutions and the development of overseas manufacturing affiliates in Wales and North England. Regional Studies, 37(1), 27-40.
83. Phelps, N. A., & Raines, P. (2003). The new competition for inward investment: Companies, institutions, and territorial development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
84. Phelps, N. A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (1998). Institutional capacity building in a strategic policy vacuum: the case of the Korean company LG in South Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 16, 735-755.
85. Rees, J. (1979). Technological change and regional shifts in American manufacturing. Professional Geographer, 31, 45-54.
86. Reid, N., & Gatrell, J. D. (2003). Uncertainty, incentives, and the preservation of an industrial icon: The case of Toledo Jeep. In N. Phelps & P. Raines (Eds.), The new competition for inward investment: Companies, institutions and territorial development (pp. 99-118). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
87. Resmini, L., & Nicolini, M. (2007). Productivity spillovers and multinational enterprises: In search of a spatial dimension. Papers DYNREG10. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
88. Roberts, A. (1996). The economic impact of foreign manufacturing investment in Wales (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Wales. Cardiff.
89. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
90. Saxenian, A. L. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91. Scott, A. J. (1993). Technopolis: High-technology industry and regional development in southern California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
92. Scott-Kennel, J. (2007). Foreign direct investment and local linkages: An empirical investigation. Management International Review, 47(1), 51-77. doi: 10.1007/s11575-007-0004-6
93. Sjoholm, F. (1999). Productivity growth in Indonesia: The role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47, 559-584.
94. Sonn, J. W., & Park, I. K. (2011). The increasing importance of agglomeration economies hidden behind convergence: Geography of knowledge production. Urban Studies, 48, 2180-2194. doi: 10.1177/0042098010382679
95. Sonn, J. W., & Storper, M. (2008). The increasing importance of geographical proximity in technological innovation: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975-1997. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1020-1039.
96. Stewart, J. C. (1976). Linkages and foreign direct investment. Regional Studies, 10, 245-258.
97. Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351-370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
98. Storper, M., & Walker, R. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
99. Tavares, A. T., & Young, S. (2006). Sourcing patterns of foreign-owned multinational subsidiaries in Europe. Regional Studies, 40, 583-600. doi: 10.1080/00343400600868739
100. Taylor, J. (1993). An analysis of the factors determining the geographical distribution of Japanese manufacturing investment in the UK, 1984-91. Urban Studies, 30(1), 209-224.
101. Taylor, M. J., & Wood, P. A. (1973). Industrial linkage and local agglomeration in the West Midlands metal industries. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 59, 129-154.
102. Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Phelps, N. A. (2000). Levelling the uneven playing field: Inward investment, interregional rivalry and the planning system. Regional Studies, 34, 429-440.
103. Thwaites, A. (1978). Technological change, mobile plants and regional development. Regional Studies, 12, 445-461.
104. Townroe, P. (1975). Branch plants and regional development. Town Planning Review, 446, 47-62.
105. Turok, I. (1993). Inward investment and local linkages: How deeply embedded is "Silicon Glen"? Regional Studies, 27, 401-417. doi: 10.1080/00343409312331347655
106. UNCTAD. (2011). World investment report 2011. New York: United Nations.
107. Veloso, F. (2006). Understanding local content decisions: Economic analysis and an application to the automotive industry. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 747-772.
108. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
109. Watts, H. (1981). The branch plant economy: A study of external control. London: Longman.
110. Welsh Affairs Committee. (1988). Inward investment into Wales and its interaction with regional and EEC policies: Minutes of evidence. London: Parliament, House of Commons.
111. Williams, D., McDonald, F., Tüselmann, H. J., & Turner, C. (2008). Domestic sourcing by foreign-owned subsidiaries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 260-276.
112. Wren, C., & Jones, J. (2009). Re-investment and the survival of foreign-owned plants. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 214-223.
113. Wren, C., & Taylor, J. (1999). Industrial restructuring and regional policy. Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 487-516. doi: 10.1093/oep/51.3.487
114. Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). Infrastructure or foreign direct investment? An examination of the implications of MNE strategy for economic development. Journal of World Business, 44, 144-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2008.05.004
115. Young, S., Hood, N., & Peters, E. (1994). Multinational enterprises and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 28, 657-677.