Expanding community: Youth, social networking, and schools

Comunicar

Volumn 20, Issue 40, 2013, Pages 79-87

  Stornaiuolo, Amy ^a   DiZio, Jennifer K ^b   Hellmich, Emily A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; Digital media; Hospitality; New literacies; Social networking; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874801894     PISSN: 11343478     EISSN: 19883293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3916/C40-2013-02-08     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ANDERSON, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
2. BANAJI, S. & BUCKINGHAM, D. (2010). Young People, the Internet, and Civic Participation: An Overview of Key Findings from the CivicWeb Project. IJLM, 2(1), 15-24. (DOI:10.1162/ijlm_a_ 00 038).
3. BOYD, D. (2011). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. PAPACHARISSI (Ed.), Networked Self. (pp. 38-57). New York: Routledge.
4. CASTELLS, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
5. CUBAN, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. DELANTY, G. (2003). Community. London: Routledge.
7. GLASER, B.G. & STRAUSS, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
8. HAAS, C., CARR, B.J. & TAKAYOSHI, P. (2011). Building and Maintaining Contexts in Interactive Networked Writing: An Examination of Deixis and Intertextuality in Instant Messaging. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(3), 276-298. (DOI: 10. 1177/1050651911401248).
9. HANSEN, D.T. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and Education: A View from the Ground. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 1-30.
10. HULL, G.A., STORNAIUOLO, A. & STERPONI, L. (in press). Imagined Readers and Hospitable Texts: Global Youth Connect Online. In D.
11. ALVERMANN, N. UNRAU & R. RUDDELL (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 6th edition. IRA.
12. HUTCHISON, A. & REINKING, D. (2011). Teachers' Perceptions of Integrating Information and Communication Technologies into Literacy Instruction: A National Survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312-333.
13. INTRONA, L.D. & BRIGHAM, M. (2007). Reconsidering Community and the Stranger in the Age of Virtuality. Society and Business Review, 2(2), 166-178. (DOI:10.1108/17465680710757385).
14. LANGE, P.G. (2008). Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Com mu nication, 13(1), 361-380. (DOI:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2 0 07. 00 400.x).
15. LIU, H. (2008). Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252-275. (DOI:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00395.x).
16. MILES, M.B. & HUBERMAN, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. NANCY, J.L. (1991). The Inoperative Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. NANCY, J.L. (2000). Being Singular Plural. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
19. PAPACHARISSI, Z. (2002). The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27. (DOI:10.1177/14614440222226244).
20. POSTILL, J. (2008). Localizing the Internet Beyond Communities and Networks. New Media & Society, 10(3), 413-431. (DOI:10.1177/1461444808089416).
21. POYNTZ, S.R. (2009). «On Behalf of a Shared World»: Arendtian Politics in a Culture of Youth Media Participation. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 31(4), 365-386.
22. RHEINGOLD, H. (1993). The Virtual Community. Addison Wesley.
23. SILVERSTONE, R. (2007). Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
24. WILLSON, M. (2010). Technology, Networks and Communities. Information, Communication & Society, 13(5), 747-764. (DOI:10. 1080/13691180903271572).