Feasibility of the iPad as a hub for smart house technology in the elderly; effects of cognition, self-efficacy, and technology experience

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 299-306

  Alvseike, Hilde ^a   Brønnick, Kolbjørn ^a,b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cognition; Elderly; iPad; Self efficacy; Smart house technology; Technology experience

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPUTER; EXPERIENCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; IPAD; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SMART HOUSE TECHNOLOGY; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCE;

EID: 84874782957     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11782390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S35344     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. St. meld. nr.9. Perspektivmeldingen 2009. Oslo, Norway: Finansdepartementet; 2009. [Long-Term Perspectives for the Norwegian Economy]. Available in English at http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/fin/press-center/press-releases/2009/long-term-perspectives-for-the-norwegian.html?id=542381.
2. Garasen H, Magnussen J, Windspoll R, Johnsen R. Elderly patients in hospital or in an intermediate nursing home department-cost analysis. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008;128(3):283-285.
3. Scocco P, Rapattoni M, Fantoni G. Nursing home institutionalization: a source of eustress or distress for the elderly? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(3):281-287.
4. Stefanov DH, Zeungnam B, Won-Chul B. The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 2004;12(2):228-250.
5. NOU2011:11. Innovasjon i omsorg. Oslo, Norway: Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet; 2011. [Innovation in the Care services]. Available in English at http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/37990512/PDFS/NOU201120110011000EN_PDFS.pdf
6. McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptibility of assistive technology to older people. Ageing and Society. 2005;25:91-110.
7. Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L. Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing and Society. 2003;23(05):561-582.
8. Statistics Norway. IKT i husholdningene. 2010. Available from: http://www.ssb.no/emner/10/03/ikthus/arkiv/tab-2010-09-24-03.html. Accessed on November 10, 2012.
9. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, etal. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21(2):333-352.
10. Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, Konig HH, Brahler E, Riedel-Heller SG. Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):31-38.
11. Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Kottorp A, Nygard L. Ability to manage everyday technology: a comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):462-469.
12. Rosenberg L, Kottorp A, Winblad B, Nygård L. Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16(4):216-226.
13. Bandura A. Self Efficacy. The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: WH Freeman and Co; 1997.
14. Kobayashi M, Hiyama A, Miura T, Asakawa C, Hirose M, Ifukube T. Elderly user evaluation of mobile touchscreen interactions. Human-Computer Interaction' INTERACT 2011. Human-computer interaction, Lisbon, Portugal 5-9 September, 2011. 2011:83-99.
15. Werner F, Werner K, Oberzaucher J. Tablets for seniors: An evaluation of a current model (iPad). Ambient Assisted Living. 2012:177-184.
16. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Greenwich, CT: IAP; 2006.
17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198.
18. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1988.
19. Faul F, Erdfeldter E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191.
20. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, etal. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1-2):125-132.
21. Koopman-van den Berg DJ, van der Bijl JJ. The use of self-efficacy enhancing methods in diabetes education in the Netherlands. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 2001;15(3):249-257.