Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China

Research Policy

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 552-563

  Liegsalz, Johannes ^a,b   Wagner, Stefan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b BMW AG   (Germany)

^c EUROPEAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

China; Duration; Patent examination; State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO)

Indexed keywords

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

CHINA; DURATION; PATENT APPLICATIONS; PATENT EXAMINATION; STATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SIPO);

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84874778718     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. D. Bosworth, and D. Yang Intellectual property law, technology flow and licensing opportunities in the People's Republic of China International Business Review 9 4 2000 453 477
2. Branstetter, L.; Fishman, R.; Foley, F.C.; Saggi, K.; 2007. Intellectual Property Rights, Imitation, and Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper 13033, National Bureau of Economic Research.
3. J. Cantwell, and S. Iammarino Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions Regional Studies 34 4 2000 317 332
4. D.R. Cox Regression models and life-tables Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Series B (Methodological) 34 2 1972 187 220
5. P. Ganea, and T. Pattloch Intellectual Property Law in China 2005 Kluwer Law International The Hague
6. J. Gans, D. Hsu, and S. Stern The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: evidence from patent grant delays Management Science 54 5 2009 982 997
7. D. Harhoff, and S. Wagner The duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office Management Science 55 12 2009 1969 1984
8. D. Harhoff, F.M. Scherer, and K. Vopel Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights Research Policy 32 8 2003 1343 1363
9. J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica 47 1 1979 153 161
10. K. Huang China's innovation landscape Science 329 2010 632 633
11. P.H. Jensen, A. Palangkaraya, and E. Webster Disharmony in international patent office decisions Federal Circuit Bar Journal 15 4 2006 679 712
12. D.K.N. Johnson, and D. Popp Forced out of the closet: the impact of the American inventors protection act on the timing of patent disclosure RAND Journal of Economics 34 1 2003 96 112
13. J.D. Kalbfleisch, and R.L. Prentice The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data 1980 Wiley New York
14. R.D. Katznelson Bad science in search of bad patents Federal Circuit Bar Journal 17 1 2007 1 30
15. S. Kortum, and J. Lerner What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Research Policy 28 1999 1 22
16. M. Kotabe A comparative study of U.S. and japanese patent systems Journal of International Business Studies 23 1 1992 147 168
17. K.E. Maskus Intellectual property rights in agriculture and the interests of Asian-Pacific economies World Economy 29 6 2004 715 742
18. K.E. Maskus, and M. Penubarti How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics 39 3-4 1995 227 248
19. K.E. Maskus, S.M. Dougherty, and A. Mertha Intellectual property rights and economic development in China C. Fink, K.E. Maskus, Intellectual Property Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research 2005 Prepared for the World Bank Washington 295 331
20. OECD, 1994. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators. Technical Report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
21. R. Paci, and S. Usai Technological enclaves and industrial districts: an analysis of the regional distribution of innovative activity in Europe Regional Studies 34 2 2000 97 114
22. P. Patel, and K. Pavitt Is western Europe losing the technological race? Research Policy 16 2-4 1987 59 85
23. Popp, D.; Juhl, T.; Johnson, D.K.N.; 2003. Time in Purgatory: Determinants of the Grant Lag for U.S. Patent Applications. NBER Working Paper 9518, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.
24. C. Quillen, and O. Webster Continuing patent applications and performance of the U.S. Patent Office Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11 1 2001 1 21
25. Regibeau, P.; Rockett, K.; 2003. Are More Important Patents Approved More Slowly and Should They? Department of Economics Working Paper 556, University of Essex.
26. M. Reitzig, and P. Puranam Value appropriation as an organizational capability: the case of IP protection through patents Strategic Management Journal 30 7 2009 765 789
27. Saggi, K.; 2000. Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer-A Survey. Working Paper 2349, World Bank.
28. S. Scotchmer Innovation and Incentives 2004 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
29. P.J. Smith Are weak patent rights a barrier to U.S. exports? Journal of International Economics 48 1 1999 151 177
30. L.G. Soete, and S.M.E. Wyatt The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator Scientometrics 5 1 1983 31 54
31. N. Stevnsborg, and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie Patenting procedures and filing strategies at the EPO D. Guellec, B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, The Economics of the European Patent Office 2007 Oxford University Press Oxford 155 183
32. M. Trajtenberg A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations RAND Journal of Economics 21 1 1990 172 187
33. B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie The quality factor in patent systems. Industrial and corporate change Industrial and Corporate Change 20 6 2011 1755 1793
34. Van Zeebroeck, N.; 2007. Patents Only Live Twice: A Patent Survival Analysis in Europe. Working Papers CEB 07-028.RS, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Brussels.
35. N. Van Zeebroeck, B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, and D. Guellec Claiming more: the increased voluminosity of patent applications and its determinants Research Policy 38 2009 1006 1020
36. L. Wang Intellectual property protection in China International Information & Library Review 36 3 2004 253 261
37. World Intellectual Property Organization, 2009. World Intellectual Property Indicators (2009 edition). Geneva.
38. D. Yang Pendency and grant ratios of invention patents: a comparative study of the US and China Research Policy 37 6-7 2008 1035 1046
39. D. Yang, and P. Clarke Globalization and intellectual property in China Technovation 25 5 2005 545 555
40. L. Yasong, and M.T. Connor An overview of the judicial protection of patents in China Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 3 3 2008 163 173
41. X. Yu China World Intellectual Property Organization Intellectual Property in Asian Countries: Studies on Infrastructure and Economic Impact 2010 WIPO Publication 1018 Geneva 154 209