Presentation of clinical laboratory results: An experimental comparison of four visualization techniques

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 325-331

  Torsvik, Torbjørn ^a   Lillebo, Børge ^a   Mikkelsen, Gustav ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ALBUMIN; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; AMYLASE; BICARBONATE; BILIRUBIN; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; CARBON DIOXIDE; CREATININE; GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE; GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN; MAGNESIUM; POTASSIUM; SODIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; INTERVIEW; LABORATORY TEST; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; PROTHROMBIN TIME; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE;

AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; CLINICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; NORWAY; OBSERVER VARIATION;

EID: 84874762824     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001147     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mindemark M, Larsson A. Longitudinal trends in laboratory test utilization at a large tertiary care university hospital in Sweden. Upsala J Med Sci 2011;116:34-8.
2. Poon EG, Wang SJ, Gandhi TK, et al. Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform 2003;36:80-91.
3. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:121-128.
4. Edelman D. Outpatient diagnostic errors: unrecognized hyperglycemia. Eff Clin Pract 2002;5:11-16.
5. Callen J, Georgiou A, Li J, et al. The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:194-199.
6. Mayer M, Wilkinson I, Heikkinen R, et al. Improved laboratory test selection and enhanced perception of test results as tools for cost-effective medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998;36:683-690.
7. Bauer DT, Guerlain S, Brown PJ. The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:416-424.
8. Meyer J. Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a Visual Search Model. Ergonomics 2000;43:1840-1865.
9. Lohse GL. A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. HumComp Interact 1993;8:353-388.
10. Mayer M, Chou D, Eytan T. Unit-independent reporting of laboratory test results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001;39:50-52.
11. Powsner SM, Tufte ER. Graphical summary of patient status. Lancet 1994;344:386-389.
12. Tufte E. Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press LLC, 2006:213.
13. Wachter SB, Johnson K, Albert R, et al. The Evaluation of a Pulmonary Display to etect Adverse Respiratory Events Using High Resolution Human Simulator. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:635-642.
14. Agutter J, Drews F, Syroid N, et al. Evaluation of graphic cardiovascular display in a high-fidelity simulator. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1403-1413.
15. Gurushanthaiah K, Weinger M, Englund C. Visual display format affects the ability of anesthesiologists to detect acute physiologic changes: a laboratory study employing a clinical display simulator. Anesthesiology 1995;83:1184-1193.
16. Plaisant C, Mushlin R, Snyder A, et al. LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:76-80.