Selecting random Latin hypercube dimensions and designs through estimation of maximum absolute pairwise correlation

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Hernandez, Alejandro S ^a   Lucas, Thomas W ^a   Sanchez, Paul J ^a  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; DEGREE OF CORRELATIONS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; HYPER-CUBES; LATIN HYPERCUBE; LATIN HYPERCUBE DESIGNS; MULTICOLLINEARITY; PAIRWISE CORRELATION;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84874718769     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2012.6465112     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Buyske, S., and Trout, R. 2001. Advanced Design of Experiments. Statistics 591 Lecture Series, Rutgers University.
2. Cioppa, T.M. 2002. Efficient Nearly Orthogonal and Space-Filling Experimental Designs for High-Dimensional Complex Models. Doctoral Dissertation, Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
3. Cioppa, T.M., and Lucas, T.W. 2007. Efficient Nearly Orthogonal and Space-Filling Latin Hypercubes. Technometrics, 45-55. (Pubitemid 46373233)
4. Fedorov, V.V. 1972. Theory of Optimal Experiments. New York: Academic Press.
5. Florian, A. 1992. An Efficient Sampling Scheme: Updated Latin Hypercube Sampling. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 7, 123-130.
6. Hernandez, A.S. 2008. Breaking Barriers to Design Dimensions in Nearly Orthogonal Latin Hypercubes. Doctoral Dissertation, Monterey, CA, Naval Postgraduate School.
7. Iman, R.L., and Conover, W.J. 1982. A Distribution-Free Approach to Inducing Rank Correlation among Input Variables. Communications in Statistics - Simulation Computations, 11(3), 311-334.
8. Joseph, V.R., and Hung, Y. 2008. Orthogonal-Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs. Statistica Sinica, 18, 171-186.
9. Johnson, R.T., Montgomery, D.C., Jones, B., and Fowler, J.W. 2008. Comparing Designs for Computer Experiments. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 463-470.
10. Kim, L., and Loh, H. 2003. Classification Trees and Bivariate Linear Discriminant Node Models. Journal of Graphical and Statistics, 12, 512-530.
11. Kleijnen, J.P.C., Sanchez, S.M., Lucas, T.W., and Cioppa, T.M. 2005. A User's Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 17(3), 263-289. (Pubitemid 41342309)
12. Leon, S.J. 2002. Linear Algebra with Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., and Conover, W.J. 1979. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics, 21(2), 239-245. (Pubitemid 9452235)
14. Montgomery, D.C. 2005. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
15. Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., and Vining, C.G. 2001. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16. Owen, A.B. 1994. Controlling Correlations in Latin Hypercube Samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association: Theory and Methods, 89(428), 1517-1522.
17. Pang, F., Liu, M.Q., and Lin, D.K.J. 2009. A Construction Method for Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs with Prime Power Levels. Statistica Sinica, 19, 1721-1728.
18. Patterson, H.D. 1954. The Errors of Lattice Sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 16(1), 140-149.
19. Sanchez, S.M., Lucas, T.W., Sanchez, P.J., Nannini, C.J., and Wan, H. 2012. Designs for Large-Scale Simulation Experiments, with Application to Defense and Homeland Security. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. In K. Hinkelmann. (Ed.) Volume 3: Special Designs and Applications, pp. 413-441. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
20. Santner, T.J., Williams, B.J., and Notz, W. 2003. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. New York: Springer Verlag.
21. Steinberg, D.M., and Lin, D.K.J. 2006. A Construction Method for Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs. Biometrika, 93(2), 279-288. (Pubitemid 43992191)
22. Sugiyama, S.O., and Chow, J.W. 1997. @Risk, Riskview and BestFit. OR/MS Today, 24(2), 64-66.
23. Tang, B. 1998. Selecting Latin Hypercubes Using Correlation Criteria. Statisca Sinica, 8, 965-977. (Pubitemid 128480630)
24. Ye, K.Q. 1998. Orthogonal Column Latin Hypercubes and Their Application in Computer Experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association - Theory and Methods, 93(444), 1430-1439. (Pubitemid 128385553)