Exercise training programs in Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres

Netherlands Heart Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 138-143

  Vromen, T ^a,b   Spee, R F ^a   Kraal, J J ^b   Peek, N ^b   van Engen Verheul, M M ^b   Kraaijenhagen, R A ^c   Gijsbers, H J H ^d,e   Kemps, H M C ^a,b  

^a MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics NIPED   (Netherlands)

^d Dutch Association for Cardiopulmonary and Cardiovascular Physiotherapy   (Netherlands)

^e Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation; Exercise; Physical training

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EXERCISE; EXERCISE INTENSITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEART FAILURE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART RATE; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESISTANCE TRAINING; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TRAINING; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

EID: 84874703500     PISSN: 15685888     EISSN: 18766250     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-013-0374-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Vaartjes I, van Dis I, Visseren FLJ, et al. Hart- en vaatziekten in Nederland 2010, cijfers over leefstijl- en risicofactoren, ziekte en sterfte. Den Haag: Nederlandse Hartstichting; 2010.
2. Leal J, Luengo-Fernández R, Gray A, et al. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European union. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(13):1610-9. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
3. Müller-Riemenschneider F, Meinhard C, Damm K, et al. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17 (6):688-700.
4. Davies EJ, Moxham T, Rees K, et al. Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010.
5. Leon AS, Franklin BA, Costa F, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American heart association scientific statement from the council on clinical cardiology (subcommittee on exercise, cardiac rehabilitation, and prevention) and the council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism (subcommittee on physical activity), in collaboration with the American association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. Circulation. 2005;111(3):369-76.
6. Piepoli MF, Corrà U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European association of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(1):1-17.
7. Revalidatiecommissie Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Cardiologie/Nederlandse Hartstichting. Multisiciplinaire Richtlijn Hartrevalidatie 2011. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Cardiologie 2011.; 2011.
8. Hansen D, Stevens A, Eijnde BO, et al. Endurance exercise intensity determination in the rehabilitation of coronary artery disease patients a critical Re-appraisal of current evidence. Sports Med. 2012;42(1):11-30.
9. Bartsch P. Platelet activation with exercise and risk of cardiac events. Lancet. 1999;354(9192):1747-8.
10. Lee JY, Jensen BE, Oberman A, et al. Adherence in the training levels comparison trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28(1):47-52.
11. Amundsen BH, Rognmo O, Hatlen-Rebhan G, et al. High intensity aerobic exercise improves diastolic function in coronary artery disease. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008;42(2):110-7.
12. Amundsen BH, Rognmo Ø, Hatlen-Rebhan G, et al. Training level comparison study: effect of high and low intensity training on ventilatory threshold in men with coronary artery disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16(4):227-32.
13. Moholdt TT, Amundsen BH, Rustad LA, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J. 2009;158(6):1031-7.
14. Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J, et al. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004;11(3):216-22.
15. Cadroy Y, Pillard F, Sakariassen KS, et al. Strenuous but not moderate exercise increases the thrombotic tendency in healthy sedentary male volunteers. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93(3):829-33.
16. Perri MG, Anton SD, Durning PE, et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol. 2002;21(5):452-8.
17. Goto Y, Saito M, Iwasaka T, et al. Poor implementation of cardiac rehabilitation despite broad dissemination of coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: a nationwide survey. Circ J. 2007;71:173-9.
18. Bradley JM, Wallace ES, McCoy PM, et al. A survey of exercise based cardiac rehabilitation services in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 1997;66(2):100-6.
19. Deturk WE, Scott LB. Physical therapists as providers of care: exercise prescriptions and resultant outcomes in cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation programs in New York State. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2008;19(2):35-43.
20. Kemps HM, van Engen-Verheul MM, Kraaijenhagen RA, et al. Improving guideline adherence for cardiac rehabilitation in the Netherlands. Neth Heart J. 2011;19:285-9.
21. van Engen-Verheul MM, Kemps HM, de Keizer NF, et al. Revision of the Dutch clinical algorithm for assessing patient needs in cardiac rehabilitation based on identified implementation problems. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(3):504-14. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
22. Grol R, Grimshaw J, et al. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225-30.
23. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T, et al. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(2):107-23.
24. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why Don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?: a framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458-65.
25. Goud R, van Engen-Verheul M, de Keizer NF, et al. The effect of computerized decision support on barriers to guideline implementation: a qualitative study in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):430-7. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
26. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(6):1-72. iii-iv.