Revision of the Dutch clinical algorithm for assessing patient needs in cardiac rehabilitation based on identified implementation problems

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 504-514

  Van Engen Verheul, Mariëtte M ^a   Kemps, Hareld M C ^a,b   De Keizer, Nicolette F ^a   Hellemans, Irene M ^a   Goud, Rick ^a,c   Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A ^d,e   Peek, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Gupta Strategists ^*  (Netherlands)

^d Netherlands Soc of Cardiology and the National Multidisciplinary Assembly on Cardiac Rehabilitation ^*  (Netherlands)

^e NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics NIPED   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

access; and evaluation; cardiac rehabilitation; healthcare quality; information systems; Practice guidelines

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC REHABILITATION AND SECONDARY PREVENTION; DEPRESSION; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN NEEDS; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT NEED; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECONDARY PREVENTION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84865544203     PISSN: 20474873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1741826711408148     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Piepoli MF, Corra U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 ; 17 (1). 1-17
2. Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, et al. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Physical Therapy Association, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Inter-American Heart Foundation, National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 ; 50 (14). 1400-1433
3. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, McGee H, Zwisler AD, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 ; 17 (4). 410-418
4. Bethell H, Lewin R, Dalal H. Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2009 ; 95 (4). 271-275
5. Short R. Access to cardiac rehabilitation varies widely across Europe. BMJ. 2008 ; 336 (7653). 1095-1095
6. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 ; 342 (8883). 1317-1322 (Pubitemid 23345178)
7. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999 ; 282 (15). 1458-1465 (Pubitemid 29493800)
8. Clinical guideline 48: MI: Secondary prevention in primary and secondary care for patients following a myocardial infarction. London: NICE ; 2007 :
9. Gielen S, Brutsaert DL, Saner H, Hambrecht R The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2 nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Camm AJ Luscher TF Serruys PW, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press ; 2006 :
10. Rehabilitation Committee (NHS-NVVC). Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation. The Hague: Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2004. (http://webshop.hartstichting.nl/Producten/Producten.aspx?CatID=71&pID=2665 (consulted 6 April 2011).
11. Shortliffe EH, Buchanan BG, Feigenbaum EA. Knowledge engineering for medical decision making: A review of computer-based clinical decision aids. Proc IEEE. 1979 ; 67 (9). 1207-1224 (Pubitemid 9244874)
12. Goud R, Hasman A, Peek N. Development of a guideline-based decision support system with explanation facilities for outpatient therapy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 ; 91 (2). 145-153
13. Goud R, de Keizer NF, ter Riet G, et al. Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ. 2009 ; 338: b1440 - b1440
14. Mezzani A, Agostoni P, Cohen-Solal A, et al. Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 ; 16 (3). 249-267
15. Hillers TK, Guyatt GH, Oldridge N, et al. Quality of life after myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 ; 47 (11). 1287-1296 (Pubitemid 24361537)
16. Updating clinical guidelines and correcting errors. The guidelines manual. London: NICE ; 2009: 142-147.
17. Campbell MK, Fayers PM, Grimshaw JM. Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research. Clin Trials. 2005 ; 2 (2). 99-107 (Pubitemid 40637892)
18. Goud R, van Engen-Verheul M, de Keizer NF, et al. The effect of computerized decision support on barriers to guideline implementation: a qualitative study in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Med Inform. 2010 ; 79 (6). 430-437
19. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002 ; 11 (3). 193-205
20. de Gucht V, van Elderen T, van der Kamp L, Oldridge N. Quality of life after myocardial infarction: translation and validation of the MacNew Questionnaire for a Dutch population. Qual Life Res. 2004 ; 13 (8). 1483-1488 (Pubitemid 39221635)
21. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999 ; 318 (7182). 527-530 (Pubitemid 29189000)
22. Mancia G, Grassi G. The new European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) Guidelines. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 ; 2 (1). 5-12 (Pubitemid 351583138)
23. Polit DF, Hungler BP Nursing research: Principles and methods. 6 th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1995. Philadelphia: Lippincott ; 1995 :
24. Getting evidence into practice. Effective health care. Plymouth: Latimer Trend and Company Ltd ; 1999 :
25. Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene IS, Ockene JK. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 ; 24 (2). 389-398
26. Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, et al. The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 2005 ; 161 (4). 389-398 (Pubitemid 40256210)
27. Dowding D, Thompson C. Measuring the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2003 ; 44 (1). 49-57 (Pubitemid 37352309)
28. Peveler R, Kilkenny L, Kinmonth AL. Medically unexplained physical symptoms in primary care: a comparison of self-report screening questionnaires and clinical opinion. J Psychosom Res. 1997 ; 42 (3). 245-252 (Pubitemid 27186876)
29. Recommendations for exercise training in chronic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2001 ; 22 (2). 125-135
30. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997 ; 27 (2). 363-370 (Pubitemid 27139969)
31. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999 ; 282 (18). 1737-1744 (Pubitemid 29533604)
32. Rosengren A, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004 ; 364 (9438). 953-962 (Pubitemid 39208456)
33. Douwes M, Hildebrandt VH. Questions on the amount of physical activity (in Dutch). Geneeskunde en Sport. 2000 ; 33 (1). 9-16 (Pubitemid 30143047)
34. Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Saris WH, Kromhout D. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 ; 56 (12). 1163-1169 (Pubitemid 37532802)
35. Seppa K, Lepisto J, Sillanaukee P. Five-shot questionnaire on heavy drinking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 ; 22 (8). 1788-1791 (Pubitemid 28536172)