Assessment of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for imaging of cartilage during fracture healing

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 567-573

  Hayward, Lauren N M ^a   De Bakker, Chantal M J ^a   Gerstenfeld, Louis C ^b   Grinstaff, Mark W ^a,c   Morgan, Elise F ^a,b  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

cartilage; contrast agent; fracture callus; micro computed tomography; mineralized cartilage

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN POLYSULFATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CALLUS; CARTILAGE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMUR FRACTURE; FRACTURE HEALING; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BONY CALLUS; CARTILAGE; CONTRAST MEDIA; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURES, BONE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PHENAZINES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84874667144     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22265     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Mathog RH, Toma V, Clayman L, et al. 2000. Nonunion of the mandible: an analysis of contributing factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58: 746-752.
2. Meidinger G, Imhoff A, Paul J, et al. 2011. May smokers and overweight patients be treated with a medial open-wedge HTO? Risk factors for non-union. Knee Surg Sports Traumat Arthrosc 19: 333-339.
3. Retzepi M, Donos N., 2010. The effect of diabetes mellitus on osseous healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 21: 673-681.
4. Einhorn TA., 1998. The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop S7-S21.
5. Jepsen KJ, Price C, Silkman LJ, et al. 2008. Genetic variation in the patterns of skeletal progenitor cell differentiation and progression during endochondral bone formation affects the rate of fracture healing. J Bone Miner Res 23: 1204-1216.
6. Reynolds DG, Takahata M, Lerner AL, et al. 2011. Teriparatide therapy enhances devitalized femoral allograft osseointegration and biomechanics in a murine model. Bone 48: 562-570.
7. Holstein JH, Orth M, Scheuer C, et al. 2011. Erythropoietin stimulates bone formation, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis in a femoral segmental defect model in mice. Bone 49: 1037-1045.
8. Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, et al. 2009. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone 44: 335-344.
9. Marsell R, Einhorn TA., 2011. The biology of fracture healing. Injury 42: 551-555.
10. Hayward LNM, de Bakker CMJ, Lusic H, et al. 2012. MRT letter: contrast-enhanced computed tomographic imaging of soft callus formation in fracture healing. Microsc Res Tech 75: 7-14.
11. Joshi NS, Bansal PN, Stewart RC, et al. 2009. Effect of contrast agent charge on visualization of articular cartilage using computed tomography: exploiting electrostatic interactions for improved sensitivity. J Am Chem Soc 131: 13234-13235.
12. Bansal PN, Joshi NS, Entezari V, et al. 2011. Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage. J Orthop Res 29: 704-709.
13. Bansal PN, Entezari V, Stewart RC, et al. 2011. Analysis of diffusion kinetics of anionic and cationic iodinated contrast agents using in-vivo CT imaging of rabbit knee cartilage. 57th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society Poster No. 1615.
14. Gerstenfeld LC, Alkhiary YM, Krall EA, et al. 2006. Three-dimensional reconstruction of fracture callus morphogenesis. J Histochem Cytochem 54: 1215-1228.
15. Bonnarens F, Einhorn TA., 1984. Production of a standard closed fracture in laboratory animal bone. J Orthop Res 2: 97-101.
16. Diemer NH., 1982. Quantitative morphological studies of neuropathological changes. Part 1. Crit Rev Toxicol 10: 215-263.
17. Stoffel M, Blau C, Reinl H, et al. 2004. Identification of brain tissue necrosis by MRI: validation by histomorphometry. J Neurotrauma 21: 733-740.
18. Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Muramatsu H, et al. 1997. A morphometric comparison of trabecular structure of human ilium between microcomputed tomography and conventional histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 61: 493-498.
19. Bouxsein ML, Myers KS, Shultz KL, et al. 2005. Ovariectomy-induced bone loss varies among inbred strains of mice. J Bone Miner Res 20: 1085-1092.
20. Price C, Herman BC, Lufkin T, et al. 2005. Genetic variation in bone growth patterns defines adult mouse bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res 20: 1983-1991.
21. Gerstenfeld LC, Wronski TJ, Hollinger JO, et al. 2005. Application of histomorphometric methods to the study of bone repair. J Bone Miner Res 20: 1715-1722.