Shareholder perceptions of individual and common benefits in Swedish forest commons

International Journal of the Commons

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 164-182

  Lidestav, Gun ^a   Poudyal, Mahesh ^a   Holmgren, Eva ^a   Keskitalo, E Carina H ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Community based resource management; Forest policy; Resource governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874623419     PISSN: 18750281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.323     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allmänningsutredningen. 1983. Skogsallmänningar: betänkande. Stockholm: Liber/Allmänna förl. (Ds Jo 1983:15).
2. Anon. 2008. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2008. Official statistics of Sweden. Jönköping. Swedish Forest Agency.
3. Becker, C. D. and E. Ostrom. 1995. Human Ecology and Resource Sustainability: The Importance of Institutional Diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:113-133.
4. Berkes, F. and I. J. Davidson-Hunt. 2010. Innovating through Commons Use: Community-based Enterprises. International Journal of the Commons 4(1):1-7.
5. Carlsson, L. 1995. Skogsallmänningarna i Sverige, Luleå: Forskningsrapport Tulea 1995, 22.
6. Carlsson, L. 1997. The Swedish Forest Commons: A Common Property Resource in an Urban, Industrialised Society. Rural Development Forestry Network Paper 20e (Winter 1996/97):1-13.
7. Carlsson, L. 1999. Still Going Strong, Community Forests in Sweden. Forestry 72(1):11-26.
8. Carlsson, L. 2000. Towards a Sustainable Russian Forest Sector. Natural Resources Forum 24:31-37. United Nations, Elsevier Science Ltd.
9. Carlsson, L. 2001. Keeping away from the Leviathan: the case of the Swedish forest commons. In Management of social transformations-MOST Discussion Paper No. 51. Paris: UNESCO.
10. Dayo, D. and G. Kofinas. 2010. Institutional Innovation in less than Ideal Conditions: Management of Commons by an Alaska Native Village Corporation. International Journal of the Commons 4(1):142-159.
11. Ericsson, S. 1997. Alla vill beta men ingen vill bränna. Skogshistoria inom Särna-Idre besparingsskog i nordvästra Dalarna Rapporter och Uppsatser No. 8. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
12. Holmgren, E. 2006. Forest Commons in Boreal Sweden-Influences on Forest Condition, Management and the Local Economy. Report 18. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
13. Holmgren, E., G. Lidestav, and G. Kempe. 2004. Forest Conditions and Management in Swedish Forest Commons. Small-scale Forest Economics Management and Policy 3:453-468.
14. Holmgren, E., L. Holmgren, and G. Lidestav. 2007. Comparison of Harvesting and Business Activities of Non-shareholders and Shareholders in a Forest Common in Västerbotten, Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22:582-592.
15. Holmgren, E., E. C. H. Keskitalo, and G. Lidestav. 2010. Swedish Forest Commons-A Matter of Governance? Forest Policy and Economics 12:423-431.
16. Kardell, L. 1991. En skogshistorisk skiss. Lima och Transtrand. In Ur två socknars historia, ed. T. J. Pettersson. Malung: Malungs kommun.
17. Kardell, L. 2004. Svenskarna och skogen. Från baggböleri till naturvård. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsens förlag.
18. Liljenäs, I. 1977. Allmänningsskogarna i Norrbottens län-deras betydelse för det enskilda jord-och skogsbruket. Umeå: Kungliga skytteanska samfundets handlingar, No. 16.
19. Liljenäs, I. 1982. Besparingsskogarna i Kopparbergs och Gävleborgs län samt allmänningsskogarna i Norrbottens och Västerbottens län. Umeå: Gerum, Rapport A 34.
20. Liljenäs, I. 1983. Allmänningen-En lokal resurs i Norrbottens inland Luleå: Planeringsavdelningens Rapportserie No. 6, Länsstyrelsen i Norrbottens Län.
21. McKean, M. A. 1992. Success on the Commons: A Comparative Examination of Institutions for Common Property Resource Management. Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(3):247-281.
22. McKean, M. A. 1998. Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work? In Forest resources and institutions, eds. C. Gibson, M. A. McKean, and E. Ostrom, 23-47. Rome, Italy: FAO.
23. Nylund, J.-E. and F. Ingemarson. 2007. Forest tenure in Sweden-a historical perspective, Report No. 5. Uppsala: The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Products.
24. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Pettersson, R. 2003. Ett reformverk under omprövning, Skifteslagstiftningens förändringar under första hälften av 1800-talet. Stockholm: Kungl. Skogs-och Lantbruksakademien, Skogs-och lantbrukshistoriska meddelanden nr 27.
26. SFS [Swedish Code of Statutes]. 1873. Stadgan om avvittring i Västerbottens och Norrbottens läns lappmarker, SFS 1873:26 [Act Relating to Delimitation of land in Västerbotten and Norrbotten]. Stockholm: Government of Sweden.
27. SFS [Swedish Code of Statutes]. 1906. Kunglig Maj:ts nådiga kungörelse angående Tvångsavsättning av allmänningar, SFS 1906:36 [Act Relating to establishment of commons by coersion]. Stockholm: Government of Sweden.
28. SFS [Swedish Code of Statutes]. 1952. Lag om Allmänningsskogar i Norrland och Dalarna, SFS 1952:167 [Act Relating to Collectively-Owned Forest Lands]. Stockholm: Government of Sweden.
29. Short, C. 2008. The Traditional Commons of England and Wales in the Twentyfirst Century: Meeting New and Old Challenges. International Journal of the Commons 2(2):192-221.
30. StataCorp. 2009. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
31. Stenman, L. 1983. Avvittringen I Västerbottens läns lappmark. Uppsala: Forskningsrapporter från Kulturgeografiska institutionen, no. 83. Uppsala universitet.
32. Stenman, L. 2009. Skogsallmänningar i Västerbottens län. Karlstad: Forskningsrapport Karlstad University Studies 2009:16.