Towards a sustainable Russian forest sector

Natural Resources Forum

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 31-37

  Carlsson, Lars ^a,b  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Emerging market economy; Forest resources management; Russia

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; PROPERTY RIGHTS; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 0034015029     PISSN: 01650203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00927.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arnold, J.E.M., 1993. Management of forest resources as common property. Commonwealth Forestry Review 72 (3), 157-161.
2. Barr, B., Braden, K.E., 1988. The disappearing Russian forest, Rowman & Littlefield, London.
3. Benham, A., Benham, I., Merithew, M., 1995. Institutional Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Altering Paths with Incentives and Information. Research report. International Center for Economie Growth, Washington University, St. Louis.
4. Berkes, F., Folke, C, 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems, Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Blandon, P., 1983. Soviet Forest Industries, Westview Press, Boulder, CA.
6. Bromely, D.W., 1992. Making the Commons Work, ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.
7. Buck Cox, S.J., 1985. No tragedy on the commons. Environmental Ethics 7, 49-61.
8. Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., 1998. The tragedy of the commons 30 years later. Environment 40 (10), 4-27.
9. Carlsson, L., 1995. (Forest Commons in Sweden) Research Report TLULEA. Skogsallmänningama i Sverige, Luleâ University, Luleâ, Sweden p. 22.
10. Carlsson, L., 1999. Still going strong, community forests in Sweden. Forestry 72 (1), 11-26.
11. Carlsson, L., Olsson; M.-O., 1998a. Initial Analyses of the Institutional Framework of the Russian Forest Sector, IIASA Interim Report (IR-98-027), Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, June.
12. Carlsson, L., Olsson, M.-O., 1998b. Institutions and the Emergence of Markets, Transition in the Tomsk Forest Sector. IIASA Interim Report (IR-98-084), Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, October.
13. Carlsson, L., 1998. In: Sandberg, L.A., Sverker, S. (Eds.). The Swedish Forest Commons: Challenges for Sustainable Forestry. Sustainability: the Challenge, Black Rose Books, Montreal, pp. 80-89.
14. Carlsson, L., Olsson, M.-O., Lundgren, N.-G., 1999. Forest Enterprises in Transition, Business Behavior in the Tomsk Forest Sector. IIASA Interim Report (1R-99-010), Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, March.
15. Carlsson, L., Olsson, M.-O., Varakin, M., 1999. Institutions and the Emergence of Markets, Transition in the Arkhangelsk Forest Sector. IIASA Interim Report (IR-99-021), Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, June.
16. Coleman, J., 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S20-S95.
17. Coleman, J., 1990. Norm-generating structures. In: Cook, K.S., Levi, M. (Eds.). The Limits of Rationality, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 250-273.
18. Crawford, S.E.S., Ostrom, E., 1995. A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review 89 (3), 582-600.
19. Eggertsson, T., 1998. The economic rationale of communal resources. In: Berge, E., Stenseth, N.C. (Eds.). Law and the Governance of Renewable Resources, ICS Press, Oakland, CA, pp. 55-74.
20. Feeny, D., et al., 1990. The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human Ecology 18 (1), 1-17.
21. Hardin, G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243-1248.
22. Hodgson, G.M., 1989. Economics and Institutions, Polity Press, Cambridge.
23. Huber, P., Sergei, N., Andreas, W., 1997. Tomsk-A Regional Approach to Industrial Restructuring, Interim Report-April 1997. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
24. Kaminski, A.Z., 1992. An Institutional Theory of Communist Regimes, ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.
25. Knight, J., 1994. Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Klose, F., 1985. A Brief History of the German Forest, Achievements and Mistakes Down The Ages. Eschborn: Deutche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).
27. Lehmbruch, B., 1998. Institutionalized Uncertainty: Economic transformation the Russian Timber Industry from 1992 to the Present. In: Carlsson, L., Olsson, M.-O. (Eds.). Initial Analyses of the Institutional Framework of the Russian Forest Sector, IIASA Interim Report (IR-98-027), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
28. Linder, P., Lars, O., 1992. Förändringar i norra Sveriges skogar. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, No. 86, pp. 199-215.
29. Lundgren, N.-G., 1984. Skog for export. Umeâ Studies in Economic History 6: Umeâ University, Umeâ.
30. Moiseyev, A., Uuesivuori, J., Nikolaij, B., 1998. Forest Industries in the Russian Federation. In: Palo, M., Uusinvuori, J. (Eds.). European World Forests, Society and Environment. Joensuu, Finland: Finnish Forest Resources Institute, Helsinki, Finland, United Nations University/ Institute for Advanced Studies, Tokyo, Japan.
31. McKean, M.A., 1992. Management of traditional common lands (Iriaichi) in Japan. In: Bromley, D.W., (Ed.). Making the Commons Work, pp. 63-98.
32. Mckean, M.A., Ostrom, E., 1995. Common property regimes in the forest: just a relic from the past? Unasylva 46 (180), 3-15.
33. Merlo, M., 1995. Common property forest management in Northern Italy: a historical and socio-economic profile. Unasylva 46,58-63.
34. Netting, R.M., 1981. Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community, Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. Nilsson, S., Shvidenko, A., 1998. Is Sustainable Development of the Russian Forest Sector Possible? IUFRO Occasional Paper No. 11, ISSN 1024-414X.
36. North, D., 1991. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Nove, A., 1977. The Soviet Economic System, George Alien & Unwin, London.
38. Östlund, L., 1993. Exploitation and Structural Changes in the North Swedish Boreal Forest 1800-1992. Dissertation in Forest Vegetation Ecology 4, Sveriges Lant-bruksuniversitet, Umeå.
39. Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press, New York.
40. Ostrom, E., 1992. Grafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems, ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.
41. Ostrom, E., 1996. Private and Common Property Rights. Bloomington: Workshop In Political theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, W96-23.
42. Pejovich, S., 1998. Economic Analysis of Institutions and Systems, Kluwer Academic, London.
43. Pisarenko, A.I., Strakhov, V.V., 1996. Socio-Economie Assessment of the Russian Boreal Forests, IIASA Working Paper (WP-96-58). Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, July.
44. Rolfes Jr., L.J., 1996. The Struggle for Private Land Rights in Russia. Economic Reform Today, Internet version, http://www.cipe.org/el9/ rolfes.html, 22 October, 1998.
45. Sheingauz, A., Nilsson, S., Shvidenko, A., 1995. Russian Forest Legislation. IIASA Working Paper (WP-95-45), Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, May.
46. Swedish Ministry of Agriculture, 1984. (Jordbruksdepartementet), Skogsallmänningar (Forest Commons). The Swedish Commission on Collectively-Owned Forest Lands, Ds Jo: 15.
47. World Bank, 1997. Russia: Forest Policy During Transition. A World Bank Country Study, Washington, The World Bank, Washington, DC.