Repeatability and clinical utility in stereophotogrammetric measurements of wounds

Journal of Wound Care

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 90-97

  Davis, A J ^a   Nishimura, J ^a   Seton, J ^b   Goodman, B L ^b   Ho, C H ^b,c   Bogie, K M ^a,b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LSCDVA Medical Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic wounds; Clinical implementation; Reliability; Stereophotogrammetry; Wound measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874593609     PISSN: 09690700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.2.90     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Vowden, K. Common problems in wound care: wound and ulcer measurement. Br J Nurs. 1995; 4: 775-779.
2. Lucas, C., Classen, J., Harrison, D., De, H. Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002; 15: 17-23.
3. Majeske, C. Reliability of wound surface area measurements. Phys Ther. 1992; 72: 138-141.
4. Plassman, P., Jones, T. MAV IS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Med Eng Phys. 1998; 20: 332-338.
5. Flanagan, M. A practical framework for wound assessment 2: Methods. Br J Nurs. 1997; 6: 6-11.
6. Hammond, C.E., Nixon, M.A. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2011; 38: 260-264.
7. Treuillet, S., Albouy, B., Lucas, Y. Three-dimensional assessment of skin wounds using a standard digital camera. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28: 752-762.
8. Thawer, H.A., Houghton, P.E., Woodbury, M.G. et al. A comparison of computerassisted and manual wound size measurement. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002; 48: 46-53.
9. Haghpanah, S., Bogie, K., Wang, X. et al. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1396-1402.
10. Little, C., McDonald, J., Jenkins, M.G., McCarron, P. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume. J Wound Care. 2009; 18: 250-253.
11. Sprigle, S., Nemeth, M., Gajjala, A. Iterative design and testing of a hand-held, non-contact wound measurement device. J Tissue Viability. 2012; 21: 17-26.
12. Stotts, N.A., Rodeheaver, G.T., Thomas, D.R. et al. An instrument to measure healing in pressure ulcers: development and validation of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56: M795-M799.
13. Gardner, S.E., Hillis, S.L., Frantz, R.A. A prospective study of the PUSH tool in diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2011; 38: 385-393.
14. Berlowitz, D.R., Ratliff, C., Cuddigan, J. et al. The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005; 18: 480-483.
15. Langemo, D., Cuddigan, J., Baharestani, M. et al. Pressure ulcer guidelines: 'minding the gaps' when developing new guidelines. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008; 21: 213-217.
16. Covington, J.S., Griffin, J.W., Mendius, R.K. et al. Measurement of pressure ulcer volume using dental impression materials: suggestion from the field. Phys Ther. 1989; 69: 690-694.
17. Eriksson, G., Eklund, A.E., Torlegård, K., Dauphin, E. Evaluation of leg ulcer treatment with stereophotogrammetry. A pilot study. Br J Dermatol. 1979; 101: 123-131.
18. Bulstrode, C.J., Goode, A.W., Scott P.J. Stereophotogrammetry for measuring rates of cutaneous healing: a comparison with conventional techniques. Clin Sci (Lond). 1986; 71: 437-443.
19. Langemo, D.K., Melland, H., Hanson, D. et al. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques. Adv Wound Care. 1998; 11: 337-343.
20. Langemo, D.K., Melland, H., Olson B. et al. Comparison of two wound volume measurement methods. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001; 14: 190-196.
21. Salter, R., Love, H., Frigh, R., Nixon, M. PDA-based, portable laser scanner measurement of wound size: accuracy and reproducibility. ANZ J Surg. 2006; 76 (Suppl. 1): A59.
22. Terris, D.D., Woo, C., Jarczok, M.N., Ho, C.H. Comparison of in-person and digital photograph assessment of Stage III and IV pressure ulcers among veterans with spinal cord injuries. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48: 215-224.
23. Fischetti, L.F., Paguio, E.C., Alt-White, A.C. Digitized images of wounds: a nursing practice innovation. Nurs Clin North Am. 2000; 35: 541-550.
24. Rennert, R., Golinko, M., Kaplan, D. et al. Standardization of wound photography using the Wound Electronic Medical Record. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009; 22: 32-38.
25. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989; 13: 319-340.
26. Mayrovitz, H.N., Soontupe, L.B. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009; 22: 222-229.
27. Sugama, J., Matsui, Y., Sanada, H. et al. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK). J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16: 1265-1269.
28. Papazoglou, E.S., Zubkov, L., Mao, X. et al. Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area. Wound Repair Regen. 2010; 18: 349-358.
29. Sussman, C., Swanson, G. Utility of the Sussman wound healing tool in predicting wound healing outcomes in physical therapy. Adv Wound Care. 1997; 5: 74-77.
30. Ferrell, B.A. The Sessing scale for measurement of pressure ulcer healing. Adv Wound Care. 1997; 5: 78-80.
31. Ratliff, C.R., Rodeheaver, G.T. Use of the PUSH tool to measure venous ulcer healing. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005; 51: 5, 58-63.
32. Matsui, Y., Furue, M., Sanada, H. et al. Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2011; 19: 309-315.
33. Malian, A., Azizi. A., van den Heuve, F.A., Zolfaghari, M. Development of a robust photogrammetric metrology system for monitoring the healing of bedsores. Photogrammetric Record. 2005; 20: 241-273.