Development of a robust photogrammetric metrology system for monitoring the healing of bedsores

Photogrammetric Record

Volumn 20, Issue 111, 2005, Pages 241-273

  Malian, Abbass ^a   Azizi, Ali ^a   Van Den Heuvel, Frank A ^b   Zolfaghari, Mahmoud ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Camera calibration; Close range photogrammetry; Geometric constraints; Image processing; Medical photogrammetry; Three dimensional surface reconstruction; Wound measurement

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; CAMERAS; GEOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTICAL PROJECTORS; PROBLEM SOLVING; UNITS OF MEASUREMENT;

CAMERA CALIBRATION; CLOSE RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY; GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS; MEDIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION; WOUND MEASUREMENT;

PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

MEDICINE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

LAMBERTIA;

EID: 27744520595     PISSN: 0031868X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2005.00319.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. ALVAREZ, L., DERICHE, R., SANCHEZ, J. and WEICKERT, J., 2002. Dense disparity map estimation respecting image discontinuities. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 13(1/2): 3-21.
2. ARIYAWANSA, D. D. and CLARKE, T. A., 1999. High-speed multiple-view image point correspondences using rectification. Videometrics VI, SPIE, 3641: 92-103.
3. BOERSMA, S. M., HEUVEL, F. A. VAN DEN, COHEN, A. F. and SCHOLTENS, R. E. M., 2000. Photogrammetric wound measurement with a three-camera vision system. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B5/1): 84-91.
4. FAUGERAS, O. and LUONG, Q.-T., 2001. The Geometry of Multiple Images. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 644 pages.
5. FRASER, C., 2001. Network design. Chapter 9 In Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision (Ed. K. B. Atkinson). Whittles, Caithness. 371 pages: 256-281.
6. GONZALEZ, R. C., WOODS, R. E. and EDDINS, S. L., 2003. Digital Image Processing. Second edition. Prentice-Hall, New York. 782 pages.
7. GOOCH, M. J. and CHANDLER, J. H., 2001. Failure prediction in automatically generated digital elevation models. Computers and Geoscience, 27(8): 913-920.
8. HARTLEY, R. and ZISSERMAN, A., 2004. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 672 pages.
9. HEUVEL, F. A. VAN DEN, 2002. Editorial. Theme issue on medical imaging and photogrammetry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56(5/6): 283-285.
10. JONES, T. D., 1999. Improving the precision of leg ulcer area measurement with active contour models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glamorgan. 208 pages.
11. KASSER, M. and EGELS, Y. (Eds.), 2002. Digital Photogrammetry. Taylor & Francis, London. 351 pages.
12. KRAUS, K., 1997. Photogrammetry. Vol. 2. Advanced Methods and Applications. Dummler Verlag, Bonn. 466 pages.
13. KRUCK, E., 1998. BINGO-F: bundle adjustment for engineering applications. User's Manual, Version 4.0. Gesellschaft für Industriephotogrammetrie, Aalen. 110 pages.
14. MAAS, H.-G., 1997. Mehrbildtechniken in der digitalen Photogrammetrie. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Geodäsie und Photogrammetrie, 62. ETH, Zürich, Switzerland. 118 pages.
15. MALIAN, A., HEUVEL, F. A. VAN DEN and AZIZI, A., 2002. A robust photogrammetric system for wound measurement. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34(B5): 264-269.
16. MALIAN, A., AZIZI, A. and HEUVEL, F. A. VAN DEN, 2004. MEDPHOS: a new photogrammetric system for medical measurement. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35(B5): 311-316.
17. MARJANOVIC, D., DUODALE, R. E., VOWDEN, P. and VOWDEN, K. R., 1998. Measurement of the volume of a leg ulcer using a laser scanner. Physiological Measurement, 19(4): 535-543.
18. MAVER, R. W., 1991. An actuarial report on the cost effectiveness of new medical technology. Journal of Insurance Medicine, 23(2): 120-123.
19. MAVIS, 2002. http://www.comp.glam.ac.uk/pages/staff/pplassma/MedImaging/ Projects/Wounds/MAVIS [Accessed: 23rd July 2002].
20. MITCHELL, H. L. and NEWTON, I., 2002. Medical photogrammetric measurement: overview and prospects. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56(5/6): 286-294.
21. PATIAS, P., 2002. Medical imaging challenges photogrammetry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56(5/6): 295-310.
22. PLASSMANN, P., JONES, B. F. and RING, E. F. J., 1995. A structured light system for measuring wounds. Photogrammetric Record, 15(86): 197-204.
23. PLASSMANN, P. and JONES, T. D., 1998. MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Journal of Medical Engineering and Physics, 20(5): 332-338.
24. SANTAMARIA, N. and CLAYTON, L., 2000. The development of the Alfred/Medseed wound imaging system. Collegian, 7(4): 14-18.
25. SHAO, J., 1999. Global image feature correspondence under a multi-image network. Journal of Image and Vision Computing, 17(14): 1021-1030.
26. TAO, C. V., 1999. Error analysis and modelling of terrestrial stereo imaging systems. Journal of Surveying and Land Information Systems, 59(3): 187-196.
27. TRINDER, J. C., JANSA, J. and HUANG, Y., 1995. An assessment of the precision and accuracy of methods of digital target location. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 50(2): 12-20.
28. TUYTELAARS, T. and GOOL, L. J. VAN, 1999. Content-based image retrieval based on local, affinely invariant regions. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Visual Information and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1614: 493-500.
29. ZHANG, Z., DERICHE, R., FAUOERAS, O. and LUONO, Q.-T., 1995. A robust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of unknown epipolar geometry. Artificial Intelligence, 78(1/2): 87-119.
30. ZOLFAGHARI, M. and MALIAN, A., 2000. Non metric cameras in architectural photogrammetry. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B5/2): 501-508.