Sparse Granger causality graphs for human action classification

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3374-3377

  Yi, Saehoon ^a   Pavlovic, Vladimir ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL RELATIONS; GRANGER CAUSALITY; GRANGER CAUSALITY GRAPHS; HUMAN ACTION CLASSIFICATIONS; HUMAN ACTIONS; JOINT MOVEMENT; MOTION CAPTURE DATA; POINT PROCESS; SKELETAL JOINTS; SPATIO-TEMPORAL RELATIONSHIPS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 84874566260     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. M. Ding, Y. Chen, and S. L. Bressler. Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience, Aug. 2006.
2. J. Geweke. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(378):304-313, 1982.
3. D. Gong and G. G. Medioni. Dynamic manifold warping for view invariant action recognition. In International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011.
4. C. W. J. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3):424-438, 1969.
5. J. Gu, X. Ding, S. Wang, and Y. Wu. Action and gait recognition from recovered 3-d human joints. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 40(4):1021-1033, Aug. 2010.
6. R. Li, T.-P. Tian, and S. Sclaroff. Divide, conquer and coordinate: Globally coordinated switching linear dynamical system. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(4):654-669, 2012.
7. J. Liu, S. Ji, and J. Ye. SLEP: Sparse Learning with Efficient Projections. Arizona State University, 2009.
8. M. Müller, T. Röder, M. Clausen, B. Eberhardt, B. Krüger, and A. Weber. Documentation mocap database hdm05. Technical Report CG-2007-2, Universit ät Bonn, 2007.
9. A. Nedungadi, G. Rangarajan, N. Jain, and M. Ding. Analyzing multiple spike trains with nonparametric granger causality. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 27:55-64, 2009.
10. K. Prabhakar, S. Oh, P. Wang, G. Abowd, and J. Rehg. Temporal causality for the analysis of visual events. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010.
11. S. Shariat and V. Pavlovic. Isotonic CCA for Sequence Alignment and Activity Recognition. In International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011.
12. G. T. Wilson. The factorization of matricial spectral densities. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 23(4):pp. 420-426, 1972.
13. F. Zhou and F. De la Torre. Canonical time warping for alignment of human behavior. In Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, 2009.