Recruit for Attitude, Train for Skills: Creating High Performing Leadership Teams

Educational Management Administration and Leadership

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 199-213

  Goodall, Janet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

leadership; recruitment; senior leadership teams; skills; teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874566174     PISSN: 17411432     EISSN: 17411440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1741143212468350     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aguinis H,Kraiger K.Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society.Annual Review of Psychology. 2009;60:4514-4574.
2. Apple MW.The cultural politics of home schooling.Peabody Journal of Education. 2000;75 ((1)): 256-271.
3. Arthur W,Bennett W,Edens P,Bell S.Effectiveness of training in organizations: a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88 (2): 234.
4. Bennett N,Wize C,Woods P,Harvey JDistributed Leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership; 2003:.
5. Cawelti G.Portrait of a benchmark School.Educational Leadership. 2000;57 ((5)): 424-424.
6. Coleman ALeadership in Extended Schools Leading in a Multi-Agency Environment. Nottingham: NCSL; 2006:.
7. Conger JA,Lawler E.Building a high performing board: how to choose the right members.Business Strategy Review. 2001;12 ((3)): 111-119.
8. Cranston N,Ehrich L.Enhancing the effectiveness of senior management teams in schools.International Studies in Educational Administration. 2005;33 (1): 799-801.
9. Crowson RL.The home schooling movement: a few concluding observations.Peabody Journal of Education. 2000;75 ((1)): 294-300.
10. DayCSammonsPHopkinsDHarrisAKeithwoodKGuQBrownEAhtaridouEKingtonA (2009) The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Final report. University of Nottingham and The National College for School Leadership. Available at: http://publications.dcsf.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DCSF-RR108.pdf.
11. Dvir T,Eden D,Avolio B,Shamir B.Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment.The Academy of Management Journal. 2002;45 (4): 7357-7344.
12. Earley P,Weindling DUnderstanding School Leadership. London: Paul Chapman; 2004:.
13. Farris MP,Woodruff SA.The future of home schooling.Peabody Journal of Education. 2000;75 ((1)): 233-255.
14. Glaser BG.The future of grounded theory.Qualitative Health Research. 1999;9 ((6)): 8368-8345.
15. Goodall J,Day C.A route map for Cpd.Professional Development Today. 2006;9 ((2)): 43-45.
16. Goodall J,Day C,Harris A,Lindsay G,Muijs DEvaluating Impact of Continuing Professional Development. London: Department for Education and Skills; 2005:.
17. Gorard S.Serious doubts about school effectiveness.British Educational Research Journal. 2010;36 ((5)): 7457-7466.
18. Gu Q,Sammons P,Palak M.Leadership characteristics and practices in schools with different effectiveness and improvement profiles.School Leadership & Management. 2008;28 (1): 436-443.
19. Hallinger P,Heck REducational Management: Redefining Theory, Policy and Practice. T BushL BellR BolamGlatter RRibbins P, ed. Paul Chapman: London; 1999:1781-1790.
20. Hallinger P,Heck RH.Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 19801-995.School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 1998;9 (2): 1571-1591.
21. Distributed leadership and school improvement.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2004;32 ((1)): 112-114.
22. Harris ALeadership in Schools Facing Challenging Circumstances. Copenhagen: International Congress of School Effectiveness and School Improvement; 2002a:.
23. Harris A.Effective leadership in schools facing challenging contexts.School Leadership & Management. 2002b;22 ((1)): 152-156.
24. Harris A.Distributed leadership and school improvement.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2004;32 ((1)): 11.
25. Harris ADistributed School Leadership: Developing Tomorrow's Leaders. London: Routledge; 2008:.
26. Harris A,Spillane J.Distributed leadership through the looking glass.Management in Education. 2008;22 ((1)): 313-314.
27. Holloway I,Todres L.The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence.Qualitative Research. 2003;3 ((3)): 3453-3457.
28. Jackson B,Madsen SR.Common factors of high performance teams.Common Factors of High Performance Teams. 2005;11 ((2)): 355-360.
29. Jenewein W,Morhart F.Navigating toward team success.Team Performance Management. 2008;14 ((1/2)): 1021-1028.
30. Katzenbach JR,Smith DK.The discipline of teams.Harvard Business Review. 1993;71 ((2)): 1111-1120.
31. Leithwood K,Jantzi D.The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school.Journal of Educational Administration. 2000;38 (2): 1121-1129.
32. Leithwood K,Mascall B.Collective leadership effects on student achievement.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2008;44 ((4)): 529.
33. Leithwood K,Patten S,Jantzi D.Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2010;46 (5): 671.
34. Lingard L,Albert M,Levinson W.Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research.BMJ. 2008;337:.
35. Macmillan Dictionary. London: Macmillan Publishers Limited; 2009-2011:.
36. Mathieu JE,Rapp TL.Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009;94 (1): 90.
37. Mayrowetz D.Making sense of distributed leadership: exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2008;44 (3): 4244-4255.
38. McDowell SA.The home schooling mother-teacher: toward a theory of social integration.Peabody Journal of Education. 2000;75 ((1)): 187-206.
39. Michan S,Rodger S.Characteristics of effective teams: a literature review.Australian Health Review. 2000;23 ((3)): 2012-2008.
40. Mulford B,Silins H.Revised models and conceptualisation of successful school principalship for improved student outcomes.International Journal of Educational Management. 2011;25 (1): 61-82.
41. School Leadership to-Day. Nottingham: NCSL; 2009:.
42. The Framework for School Inspection. London: Ofsted; 2009:.
43. Penlington C,Kington A,Day C.Leadership in improving schools: a qualitative perspective.School Leadership and Management. 2008;28 (1): 65-82.
44. Pont B,Nusche D,Moorman HImproving School Leadership Volume 2: Case Studies on System Leadership. Paris: OECD; 2008:.
45. University of Sydney; 2011:.
46. Robinson VMJ,Lloyd CA,Rowe K.The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2008;44 (5): 635.
47. SpillaneJ (2004) Distributed Leadership: What's All the Hoopla." Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. Available at: http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/9902.
48. Spillane J,Halverson R,Diamond J.Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective.Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2004;36 (1): 33-34.
49. Srivastava A,Bartol KM,Locke E.Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance.The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE. 2006;49 (6): 239-251.
50. From the editors: what grounded theory is not.The Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49 ((4)): 36-42.
51. Thomas DWorking Together Is Success: Full Report. Nottingham: NCSL; 2009:.
52. Thomas W,Collier V2002:.
53. Urquhart L, et al.Putting the 'theory'back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems.Information Systems Journal. 2010;20 (4): 73-81.
54. Wageman R,Nunes DA,Burruss J,Hackman J.Senior leadership teams.Harvard Business School Press. 2008;:.
55. Wallace M.Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: primary school senior management teams in England and Wales.School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2002;13 (2): 1631-1686.
56. Wing LS.Leadership in high-performance teams: a model for superior team performance.Team Performance Management. 2005;11 (1/2): 4-11.
57. Witziers B,Bosker RJ,Kruger M.Educational leadership and student achievement: the elusive search for an association.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2003;39 (3): 398.