A QFD-based fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selection

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 5864-5875

  Dursun, Mehtap ^a   Karsak, E Ertugrul ^a  

^a GALATASARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Decision support; Fuzzy weighted average; Multi criteria decision making; Quality function deployment (QFD); Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORTS; FUZZY WEIGHTED AVERAGE; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD); SUPPLIER SELECTION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FUZZY RULES; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84874565382     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Carrera D.A., Mayorga R.V. Supply chain management: a modular fuzzy inference system approach in supplier selection for new product development. J. Intell. Manuf. 2008, 19:1-12.
2. Lang T.M., Chiang J.H., Lan L.W. Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and Choquet integral. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009, 57:330-340.
3. Gencer C., Gürpinar D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: a case study in an electronic firm. Appl. Math. Model. 2007, 31:2475-2486.
4. Ghodsypour S.H., O'Brien C. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2001, 73:15-27.
5. Barbarosoĝlu G., Yazgaç T. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Prod. Inv. Manage. J. 1997, 38:14-21.
6. Chen C.T., Lin C.T., Huang S.F. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006, 102:289-301.
7. Evans R.H. Product involvement and industrial buying. J. Purch. Mater. Manage. 1981, 18:23-28.
8. Bevilacqua M., Petroni A. From traditional purchasing to supplier management: a fuzzy logic-based approach to supplier selection. Int. J. Logist.: Res. Appl. 2002, 5:235-255.
9. Bevilacqua M., Ciarapica F.E., Giacchetta G. A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 2006, 12:14-27.
10. Liu S.T. Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2005, 43:497-513.
11. Chen C.B., Klein C.M. A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B: Cybern. 1997, 27:26-35.
12. Weber C.A., Current J.R. A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1993, 68:173-184.
13. Dickson G. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J. Purch. 1966, 2:5-17.
14. Ellram L.M. The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manage. 1990, 26:8-14.
15. Wilson E.J. The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: a review and update. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manage. 1994, 30:34-41.
16. Vonderembse M.A., Tracey M. The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance. J. Supply Chain Manage. 1999, 35:33-39.
17. Boer L., Labro E., Morlacchi P. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 2001, 7:75-89.
18. Kannan V.R., Tan K.C. Supplier selection and assessment: their impact on business performance. J. Supply Chain Manage. 2002, 38:11-21.
19. Weber C.A. A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Manage. 1996, 1:28-39.
20. Masella C., Rangone A. A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of co-operative customer/supplier relationship. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 2000, 20:70-84.
21. Talluri S., Sarkis J. A model for performance monitoring of suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40:4257-4269.
22. Amid A., Ghodsypour S.H., O'Brien C. Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006, 104:394-407.
23. Araz C., özfi{dotless}rat P.M., özkarahan I. An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management. Comput. Oper. Res. 2007, 34:3738-3756.
24. Amid A., Ghodsypour S.H., O'Brien C. A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2009, 121:323-332.
25. Chen C.M. A fuzzy-based decision-support model for rebuy procurement. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2009, 122:714-724.
26. Amid A., Ghodsypour S.H., O'Brien C. A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 131:139-145.
27. Haq A.N., Kannan G. Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2006, 44:1963-1985.
28. Chan F.T.S., Kumar N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 2007, 35:417-431.
29. Bottani E., Rizzi A. An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection-an application oriented to lead-time reduction. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 111:763-781.
30. Chen L.Y., Wang T.C. Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: the strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2009, 120:233-242.
31. Wang W.P. A fuzzy linguistic computing approach to supplier evaluation. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34:3130-3141.
32. Amin S.H., Razmi J. An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management: a case study of ISP selection and evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:8639-8648.
33. Bhattacharya A., Geraghty J., Young P. Supplier selection paradigm: an integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment. Appl. Soft Comput. 2010, 10:1013-1027.
34. Karsak E.E., Sozer S., Alptekin S.E. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2003, 44:171-190.
35. Karsak E.E. Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42:3957-3974.
36. Shillito M.L. Advanced QFD - Linking Technology to Market and Company Needs 1994, Wiley, New York.
37. Hauser J.R., Clausing D. The house of quality. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1988, 66:63-73.
38. Chen L.H., Ko W.C. Fuzzy linear programming models for new product design using QFD with FMEA. Appl. Math. Model. 2009, 33:633-647.
39. Dong W.M., Wong F.S. Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1987, 21:183-199.
40. Liou T.S., Wang M.J. Fuzzy weighted average: an improved algorithm. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1992, 49:307-315.
41. Lee D.H., Park D. An efficient algorithm for fuzzy weighted average. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1997, 87:39-45.
42. Kao C., Liu S.T. Fractional programming approach to fuzzy weighted average. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2001, 120:435-444.
43. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1978, 100:9-34.
44. Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Programming with linear fractional functional. Naval Res. Logist. Q. 1962, 9:181-186.
45. Fung R.Y.K., Tang J., Tu Y., Wang D. Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40:585-599.
46. Tang J., Fung R.Y.K., Xu B., Wang D. A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration. Comput. Oper. Res. 2002, 29:1447-1463.
47. Freeling S. Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1980, 10:341-354.