Do owners have a Clever Hans effect on dogs? Results of a pointing study

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue DEC, 2012, Pages

  Schmidjell, Teresa ^a,b,c   Range, Friederike ^a,b,c   Huber, Ludwig ^a,b,c   Virányi, Zsófia ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c Clever Dog Lab Society   (Austria)

Author keywords

Clever hans effect; Dog; Object choice task; Pointing gesture

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874561859     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00558     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Albert, A., and Bulcroft, K. (1988). Pets, families, and the life course. J. Marriage Fam. 50, 543-552.
2. Beran, M. J. (2012). Did you ever hear the one about the horse that could count? Front. Psychol. 3:357. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00357
3. Berryman, J. C., Howells, K., and Lloyd-Evans, M. (1985). Pet owner attitudes to pets and people: a psychological study. Vet. Rec. 117, 659-661.
4. Blass, T. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of studies of obedience using the Milgram Paradigm: a review. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 6, 196-205.
5. Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (2006). Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J. Comp. Psychol. 120, 38-47.
6. Call, J., Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J., and Tomasello, M. (2003). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J. Comp. Psychol. 117, 257-263.
7. Erdöhegyi, Á., Topál, J., Virányi, Z., and Miklósi, Á. (2007). Dog-logic: inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task and its restricted use. Anim. Behav. 74, 725-737.
8. Gácsi, M., Kara, E., Belényi, B., Topál, J., and Miklósi, Á. (2009). The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Anim. Cogn. 12, 471-479.
9. Gácsi,M.,Topál,J.,Miklósi,Á.,Dóka,A., and Csányi, V. (2001). Attachment behavior of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centers: forming new bonds. J. Comp. Psychol. 115, 423-431.
10. Giret, N., Miklósi, Á., Kreutzer, M., and Bovet, D. (2009). Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim. Cogn. 12, 1-10.
11. Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., and Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 1634-1636.
12. Hare, B., and Tomasello, M. (1999). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J. Comp. Psychol. 113, 173-177.
13. Hare, B., and Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 439-444.
14. Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R., et al. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr. Biol. 15, 226-230.
15. Hare, B., Wobber, V., and Wrangham, R. (2012). The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Anim. Behav. 83, 573-585.
16. Harlow, H. F., and Bromer, J. A. (1938). A test-apparatus for monkeys. Psychol. Rec. 2, 434-436.
17. Hauser, M. D., Comins, J. A., Pytka, L. M.,Cahill,D. P.,andVelez-Calderon, S. (2011). What experimental experience affects dogs' comprehension of human communicative actions? Behav. Processes 86, 7-20.
18. Hepper, P. G. (1988). The discrimination of human odour by the dog. Perception 17, 549-554.
19. Herman, L. M., Abichandani, S. L., Elhajj, A. N., Herman, E. Y. K., Sanchez, J. L., and Pack,A. A. (1999). Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referential character of the human pointing gesture. J. Comp. Psychol. 113, 1-18.
20. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. Stat. Theory Appl. 6, 65-70.
21. Horn, L.,Virányi, Z., Miklósi, Á., Huber, L., and Range, F. (2012). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation. Anim. Cogn. 15, 57-71.
22. Jagoe, A., and Serpell, J. (1996). Owner characteristics and interactions and the prevalence of canine behaviour problems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 47, 31-42.
23. Kaminski, J. (2009). "Dogs (Canis familiaris) are adapted to receive human communication," in Neurobiology of "Umwelt": How Living Beings Perceive the World, Research and Perspectives in Neurosciences, eds A. Berthoz and Y. Christen (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 103-107.
24. Kaminski,J.,Nitzschner,M.,Wobber,V., Tennie, C., Bräuer, J., Call, J., et al. (2011). Do dogs distinguish rational from irrational acts? Anim. Behav. 81, 195-203.
25. Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (2005). Domestic goats (Capra hircus) follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim. Behav. 69, 11-18.
26. Kotrschal, K., Schöberl, I., Bauer, B., Thibeaut, A.-M., and Wedl, M. (2009). Dyadic relationships and operational performance of male and female owners and their male dogs. Behav. Processes 81, 383-391.
27. Kundey, S. M. A., De Los Reyes, A., Arbuthnot, J., Allen, R., Coshun, A., Molina, S., et al. (2010). Domesticated dogs' (Canis familiaris) response to dishonest human points. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 23, 201-215.
28. Lakatos, G., Soproni, K., Dóka, A., and Miklósi, Á. (2009). A comparative approach to dogs' (Canis familiaris) and human infants' comprehension of various forms of pointing gestures. Anim. Cogn. 12, 621-631.
29. Lit, L., Schweitzer, J. B., and Oberbauer, A. M. (2011). Handler knowledges affect scent detection dog outcomes. Anim. Cogn. 14, 387-394.
30. Miklósi, Á., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Virányi, Z., and Csányi, V. (2003). A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr. Biol. 13, 763-766.
31. Miklósi, Á., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., and Csányi, V. (1998). Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim. Cogn. 3, 113-121.
32. Miklósi, Á., and Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim. Cogn. 9, 81-93.
33. Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., and Csányi, V. (2004). Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim. Behav. 67, 995-1004.
34. Palmer, R., and Custance, D. (2008). A counterbalanced version of Ainsworth's strange situation procedure reveals secure-base effects in dog-human relationships. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109, 306-319.
35. Pettersson, H., Kaminski, J., Herrmann, E.,and Tomasello,M. (2011). Understanding of human communicative motives in domestic dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 133, 235-245.
36. Prato-Previde, E., Custance, D. M., Spiezio, C., and Sabatini, F. (2003). Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth's strange situation. Behaviour 140, 225-254.
37. Pfungst, O. (1907). Das Pferd des Herrn von Osten. Der Kluge Hans: Ein Beitrag zur Experimentellen Tierund Menschenpsychologie. Leipzig: Johan Ambrosius Barth [Engl.: Hans,C. (1911).The Horse of Mr. von Osten: A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology, trans. C. L. Rahn (New York: Henry Holt)].
38. Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, Á., Dóka, A., and Csányi, V. (2003). Successful application of video-projected human images for signalling to Dogs. Ethology 109, 809-821.
39. Range, F., Heucke, S. L., Gruber, C., Konz., A., Huber, L., and Virányi, Z. (2009). The effect of ostensive cues on dogs'performance in a manipulative social learning task. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 120, 170-178.
40. Range, F., Virányi, Z., and Huber, L. (2007). Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Curr. Biol. 17, 1-5.
41. Reid, P. J. (2009). Adapting to the human world: dogs' responsiveness to our social cues. Behav. Processes 80, 325-333.
42. Rosenthal, R. (1967). Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychol. Bull. 67, 356-367.
43. Scheider, L., Grassmann, S., Kaminski, J., and Tomasello, M. (2011). Domestic dogs use contextual information, and tone of voice when following a human pointing gesture. PLoS ONE 6:e21676. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021676
44. Scheumann, M., and Call, J. (2004). The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Anim. Cogn. 7, 224-230.
45. Schloegl, C., Kotrschal, K., and Bugnyar, T. (2007). Modifying the object-choice task. Is the way you look important for ravens? Behav. Processes 77, 61-65.
46. Sebeok, T. A., and Rosenthal, R. (eds.) (1981). The Clever Hans phenomenon: communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 47, vii-viii, 1-309.
47. Serpell, J. A. (2009). Having our dogs and eating them too: why animals are a social issue. J. Soc. Issues 65, 633-644.
48. Serpell, J. A. (1996). Evidence for an association between pet behavior and owner attachment levels. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 47, 49-60.
49. Silverman, I., Shulman, A. D., and Wiesenthal,D. L. (1972). The experimenter as a source of variance in psychological research: modeling and sex effects. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21, 219-227.
50. Smith, B. P., and Litchfield, C. A. (2009). Dingoes (Canis dingo) can use human social cues to locate hidden food. Anim. Cogn. 13, 367-376.
51. Soproni, K., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., and Csányi, V. (2001). Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J. Comp. Psychol. 115, 122-126.
52. Soproni, K., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., and Csányi, V. (2002). Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J. Comp. Psychol. 116, 27-34.
53. Szetei, V., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., and Csányi, V. (2003). When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 83, 141-152.
54. Topál, J., Miklósi, A., and Csányi, V. (1997). Dog-human relationship affects problem solving behavior in the dog. Anthrozoös 10, 214-224.
55. Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Csányi, V., and Dóka, A. (1998). Attachment behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth's (1969) strange situation test. J. Comp. Psychol. 112, 219-229.
56. Topál, J., Gergely, G., Erdöhegyi, Á., Csibra, G., and Miklósi, Á. (2009). Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325, 1269-1272.
57. Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., and Wynne,C. D. L. (2008a).Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim. Behav. 76, 1767-1773.
58. Udell,M.A. R.,Giglio,R.,andWynne,C. D. L. (2008b). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman non-human tokens to find hidden food. J. Comp. Psychol. 122, 84-93.
59. Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., and Wynne, C. D. L. (2010). The performance of stray dogs (Canis familiaris) living in a shelter on humanguided object-choice tasks. Anim. Behav. 79, 717-725.
60. Udell, M. A. R., Spencer, J. M., Dorey, N. R., and Wynne, C. D. L. (2012). Human-socialized wolves follow diverse human gestures and they may not be alone. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 25, 97-117.
61. Virányi,Z.,Gácsi,M.,Kubinyi,E.,Topál, J., Belenyi, B., Ujfalussy, D., et al. (2008). Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young humanreared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim. Cogn. 11, 373-387.
62. Virányi, Z., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., and Csányi, V. (2004). Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans' attentional focus. Behav. Process. 66, 161-172.
63. Voith, V. L. (1985). Attachment of people to companion animals. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 15, 289-296.
64. Wan, M., Kubinyi, E., Miklósi, Á., and Champagne, F. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of reports by German Shepherd owners in Hungary and the United States of America. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 121, 206-213.
65. Zasloff, R. L. (1996). Measuring attachment to companion animals: a dog is not a cat is not a bird. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 47, 43-48.