Comparisons of perioperative outcomes and costs between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A propensity-score matching analysis based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 349-353

  Sugihara, Toru ^a,b   Yasunaga, Hideo ^b   Horiguchi, Hiromasa ^b   Tsuru, Nobuo ^a   Ihara, Hiroyuki ^a   Fujimura, Tetsuya ^b   Nishimatsu, Hiroaki ^b   Ohe, Kazuhiko ^c   Fushimi, Kiyohide ^d   Homma, Yukio ^b  

^a Shintoshi Hospital   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Complications; Costs and cost analysis; Epidemiology; Laparoscopic surgery; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD AUTOTRANSFUSION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER STAGING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; COLORECTAL INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYSTOGRAPHY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM INJURY; DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR CLOTTING; HEART FAILURE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILEUS; JAPANESE; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOME; PERITONITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RETROPERITONEAL ABSCESS; SEPSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

AGED; ANESTHESIA; BLOOD TRANSFUSION, AUTOLOGOUS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; JAPAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 84874551066     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/iju.12079     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M etal. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur. Urol. 2012; 61: 679-685.
2. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 1-15.
3. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 431-452.
4. Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 382-404.
5. Jeong CW, Jeong SJ, Hong SK etal. Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: comparison with Western predictive tools using decision curve analysis. Int. J. Urol. 2012; 19: 846-852.
6. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 405-417.
7. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 418-430.
8. Fujimoto H, Nakanishi H, Miki T etal. Oncological outcomes of the prostate cancer patients registered in 2004: report from the Cancer Registration Committee of the JUA. Int. J. Urol. 2011; 18: 876-881.
9. Takenaka A, Tewari AK. Anatomical basis for carrying out a state-of-the-art radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol. 2012; 19: 7-19.
10. Sundram M. Asian robotic experience. Urol. Oncol. 2010; 28: 677-681.
11. Hyams ES, Mullins JK, Pierorazio P, Partin AW, Allaf M, Matlaga B. Impact of robotic technique and surgical volume on the cost of radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 2012; doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0147.
12. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T etal. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 453-458.
13. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs - the case of robot-assisted surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 363: 701-704.
14. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H etal. Impact of hospital volume and laser use on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality in cases of benign prostate hyperplasia. J. Urol. 2011; 185: 2248-2253.
15. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H etal. Renal haemorrhage risk after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: results from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database. BJU Int. 2012; 110: E332-338.
16. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H etal. Impact of surgical intervention timing on the case fatality rate for Fournier's gangrene: an analysis of 379 cases. BJU Int. 2012; 110: E1096-1100.
17. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H etal. Management trends, angioembolization performance and multiorgan injury indicators of renal trauma from Japanese administrative claims database. Int. J. Urol. 2012; 19: 559-563.
18. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York, 2002.
19. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P etal. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med. Care 2005; 43: 1130-1139.
20. Griswold ME, Localio AR, Mulrow C. Propensity score adjustment with multilevel data: setting your sites on decreasing selection bias. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010; 152: 393-395.
21. Abdollah F, Schmitges J, Sun M etal. Comparison of mortality outcomes after radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Int. J. Urol. 2012; 19: 836-844.
22. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X etal. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J. Urol. 2002; 167: 51-56.
23. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R etal. Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur. Urol. 2006; 50: 98-104.
24. Trinh QD, Schmitges J, Sun M etal. Radical prostatectomy at academic versus nonacademic institutions: a population based analysis. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 1849-1854.
25. OECD. OECD Health Data 2011. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 2011.
26. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H etal. Admissions related to interstitial cystitis in Japan: an estimation based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Int. J. Urol. 2012; 19: 86-89.