Preliminary evaluation of ultra-high pitch computed tomography enterography

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1088-1091

  Hardie, Andrew D ^a   Horst, Nicole D ^a   Mayes, Nicholas ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

CT enterography; Inflammatory bowel disease; Radiation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CT ENTEROGRAPHY; CT SCANNERS; CT TECHNOLOGY; IMAGE NOISE; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; MOTION ARTIFACT; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; RADIATION EMISSIONS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES; ULTRA-HIGH;

HEAT RADIATION; IMAGE QUALITY; PATIENT MONITORING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CROHN DISEASE; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTESTINE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

ADULT; CONTRAST MEDIA; CROHN DISEASE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINES; IOHEXOL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874535425     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120344     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Dillman JR, Adler J, Zimmermann EM, et al. CT enterography of pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40: 97-105
2. Hara AK, Swartz PG. CT enterography of Crohn's disease. Abdom Imaging 2009;34: 289-95
3. Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S, et al. Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's disease. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189: 1015-22
4. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography. Examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169: 2078-86
5. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim K, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169: 2071-7
6. Sahani D, Saini S, D'Souza RV, et al. Comparison between low (3: 1) and high (6: 1) pitch for routine abdominal/pelvic imaging with multislice computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27: 105-9
7. Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. Nucl Med Technol 2007;35: 13-225
8. Hardie AD, Mayes N, Boulter DJ. Use of high-pitch dual-source computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis to markedly reduce scan time: clinical feasibility study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35: 353-5
9. Paulson EK, Weaver C, Ho LM, et al. Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190: 151-7
10. Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelaer V, et al. Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2004;232: 164-72