Schools, Neighborhood Risk Factors, and Crime

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 292-315

  Willits, Dale ^a   Broidy, Lisa ^b   Denman, Kristine ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

routine activity theory; schools and crime; social disorganization theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874507147     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: 1552387X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128712470991     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anselin L.Spatial data analysis with GIS: An introduction to application in the social sciences. Santa Barbara: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California; 1992:.
2. Block R. L.,Block C. R.Crime and place. Eck J.Weisburd D., ed. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; 1995:145-183.
3. Burrow J. D.Youth behavior, school structure, and the student risk of victimization.Justice Quarterly. 2008;25:349-380.
4. Bursik R. J.Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects.Criminology. 1988;26:519-552.
5. Cohen L. E.,Felson M.Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.American Sociological Review. 1979;44:588-608.
6. Dunteman G. H.Principal components analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage University Press; 1989:.
7. Eccles J. S.,Harold R. D.Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes. Booth J. D. A., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996:3-34.
8. Farrington D. P.Age and crime.Crime and Justice. 1986;7:189-250.
9. Garofalo J.,Siegel L.,Laub J.School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of national crime survey (NCS) narratives.Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 1987;3:321-338.
10. Gouvis-Roman C.Schools, neighborhoods, and violence: Crime within the daily routines of youth. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2004:.
11. Haynie D.,Armstrong D. P.Race and gender-disaggregated homicide offending rates: Differences and similarities by victim-offender relations across cities.Homicide Studies. 2006;10:3-32.
12. Hill N. E.,Taylor L. C.Parental school involvement and children's academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2004;13:161-164.
13. Hirschi T.,Gottfredson M.Age and the explanation of crime.American Journal of Sociology. 1983;89:552-584.
14. Jackson P. I.Crime, youth gangs, and urban transition: The social dislocations of postindustrial economic development.Justice Quarterly. 1991;8:379-397.
15. Kautt P. M.,Roncek D. W.Schools as criminal "hot spots": Primary, secondary, and beyond.Criminal Justice Review. 2007;32:339-357.
16. Krivo L.,Peterson R.Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime.Social Forces. 1996;75:619-648.
17. LaGrange T. C.The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency. 1999;36:393-422.
18. Mosher C. J.,Miethe T. D.,Phillips D. M.The mismeasure of crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
19. Murray R.K.,Swatt M.Disaggregating the relationship between schools and crime: A Spatial Analysis.Crime & Delinquency. 2010;:.
20. Osgood D. W.Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates.Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2000;16:21-43.
21. Peterson R.,Krivo L.,Harris M. A.Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter?.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency. 2000;37:31-63.
22. Rand M. R.,Catalano S. M.Criminal victimization, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 2007:.
23. Robers S.,Zhang J.,Truman J.,Snyder T.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs; 2010:.
24. Roncek D. W.Dangerous places: Crime and residential environment.Social Forces. 1981;60:74-96.
25. Roncek D. W.,Bell R.Bars, blocks, and crime.Journal of Environmental Systems. 1981;11:35-47.
26. Roncek D. W.,Faggiani D.High schools and crime: A replication.Sociological Quarterly. 1985;26:491-505.
27. Roncek D. W.,Lobosco A.The effect of high schools on crime in their neighborhoods.Social Science Quarterly. 1983;64:598-613.
28. Roncek D. W.,Maier P. A.Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of hot spots.Criminology. 1991;29:725-753.
29. Roncek D. W.,Pravatiner M. A.Additional evidence that taverns enhance nearby crime.Sociology and Social Research. 1989;73:185-188.
30. Sampson R. J.Neighborhoods and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency. 1986;22:7-40.
31. Sampson R. J.,Groves W. B.Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory.American Journal of Sociology. 1989;94:774-802.
32. Sampson R. J.,Morenoff J. D.,Gannon-Rowley T.Assessing "neighborhood effects": Social processes and new directions in research.Annual Review of Sociology. 2002;28:443-478.
33. Sampson R. J.,Raudenbush S. W.,Earls F.Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.Science. 1997;277:918-924.
34. Shaw C. R.,McKay H. D.Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1942:.
35. Sherman L. W.,Gartin P. R.,Buerger M. E.Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place.Criminology. 1989;27:27-55.
36. Steffensmeier D.,Haynie D.Gender, structural disadvantage, and urban crime: Do macrosocial variables also explain female offending rates?.Criminology. 2000;38:403-438.
37. Veenstra R.,Lindenberg S.,Oldehinkel A.,De Winter A.,Verhulst F.,Ormel J.Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents.Developmental Psychology. 2005;41:672-682.
38. Wilcox P.,Augustine M. C.,Bryan J. P.,Roberts S. D.Reality of middle-school crime: Objective vs subjective experiences among a sample of Kentucky youth.Journal of School Violence. 2005;4:3-28.