Approaches to chronic disease management evaluation in use in Europe: A review of current methods and performance measures

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 61-70

  Conklin, Annalijn ^a   Nolte, Ellen ^b   Vrijhoef, Hubertus ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chronic disease management; Europe; Long term care; Methods; Program evaluation

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EUROPE; LONG TERM CARE; METHODS; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

DESIGN;

DISEASES;

ARTICLE; BUDGET; CHRONIC DISEASE; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EUROPE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

CHRONIC DISEASE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EUROPE; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84874498316     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462312000700     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Nolte E,McKee M. Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press/McGraw Hill Education; 2008
2. Coleman K, Austin B, Brach C, Wagner E. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28: 75-85
3. Mattke S, Seid M, Ma S. Evidence for the effect of disease management: Is $1 billion a year a good investment? Am J Managed Care. 2007;13: 670-6
4. Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: The chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:909-14
5. Nolte E,Knai C,McKee M. Managing ChronicConditions: Experience in Eight Countries. Copenhagen, DK:World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008
6. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:45-53
7. Coleman K,Mattke S, Perrault P,Wagner E. Untangling practice redesign from disease management: How do we best care for the chronically ill? Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:385-408
8. Conklin A, Nolte E. Disease Management Evaluation: A Comprehensive Review of Current State of the Art. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2011. Report No.: TR894
9. Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance [Internet]. London, UK: Medical Research Council; 2008. [cited 2012 September 19]. Available from: Http://www.mrc.ac. uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d = MRC004871
10. Lemmens KMM, Nieboer AP, van Schayck CP, Asin JD, Huijsman R. A model to evaluate quality and effectiveness of chronic disease management. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:447-53
11. Loveman E, Cave C, Green C, Royle P, Dunn N, Waugh N. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of patient education models for diabetes: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1-190
12. Tsiachristas A, Hipple-Walters B, Lemmens K, Nieboer A, Rutten-van Molken M. Towards integrated care for chronic conditions: Dutch policy developments to overcome the (financial) barriers. Health Policy. 2011;101:122-32
13. Aadelen S. Methodological challenges to prospective study of an innovation: Interregional nursing care management of cardiovascular patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998;4:197-223
14. Cretin S, Shortell S,Keeler E. An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care: Framework and study design. Eval Rev. 2004;28:28-51
15. Linden A, Adams J, Roberts N. Evaluating chronic disease management program effectiveness: An introduction to the regression discontinuity design. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;12:124-31
16. Linden A, Adams JL, Roberts N. Evaluating disease management program effectiveness: An introduction to time-series analysis. Dis Manag. 2003;6:243-55
17. Eccles M, Armstrong D, Baker R, et al. An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci. 2009;4:18
18. Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980
19. Grey M, Knafl K, McCorkle R. A framework for the study of self- And family management of chronic conditions. Nurs Outlook. 2006;54:278-86
20. Steuten L, Vrijhoef H, Severens H, van Merode F, Spreeuwenberg C. Are we measuring what matters in health technology assessment of chronic disease management? Systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:47-57
21. Howe R. Performance measurement for case management: Principles and objectives for developing standard measures. Case Manager. 2005;16: 52-6
22. Wilson T, MacDowell M, Salber P, Montrose G, Hamm C. Evaluation methods in chronic disease management studies 2004-07. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2008;16:365-73
23. Kaplan R, Norton D. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev. 1992:71-9
24. Serxner S, Baker K, Gold D. Guidelines for analysis of economic return from health management programs. Am J Health Promo. 2006;20(Suppl):1-17
25. Lavis J, Posada F, Haines A, Osei E. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet. 2004;364:1615-21