Rivermead assessment of somatosensory performance: Validation of a German version (RASP-DT);Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance: Validierung einer deutschen Version (RASP DT)

Nervenarzt

Volumn 83, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1632-1637

  Steimann, L ^a,c   Missala, I ^a,b,c   Van Kaick, S ^d   Walston, J ^e   Malzahn, U ^b,f   Heuschmann, P U ^b,f   Steinhagen Thiessen, E ^a,b,c   Dohle, C ^b,g  

^a Evangelisches Geriatriezentrum B   (Germany)

^b Center for Stroke Research Berlin CSB   (Germany)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d Katholische Fachhochschule Mainz   (Germany)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^g MEDIAN Klinik Berlin Kladow   (Germany)

Author keywords

AC1 coefficients; Interrater reliability; RASP DT; Rivermead assessment of somatosensory performance (RASP); Sensory deficits after stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RIVERMEAD ASSESSMENT SOMATOSENSORY PERFORMANCE; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION;

ENGLAND; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSATION DISORDERS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TRANSLATING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84874490918     PISSN: 00282804     EISSN: 14330407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00115-012-3614-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Carey LM (1995) Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 7:51-91
2. Han L, Law-Gibson D, Reding M (2002) Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke. Stroke 33:1920-1924
3. Sommerfeld DK, Arbin MH von (2004) The impact of somatosensory function on activity performance and length of hospital stay in geriatric patients with stroke. Clin Rehabil 18:149-155
4. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S (2000) The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:1357-1363
5. Sullivan JE, Hedman LD (2008) Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil 15:200-217
6. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J et al (2008) Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:166-172
7. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT (1999) Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke. Clin Rehabil 13:48-55
8. Doyle S, Bennett S, Fasoli SE, McKenna KT (2010) Interventions for sensoryimpairment in the upper limb after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD006331
9. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT (2002) The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clin Rehabil 16:523-33
10. Busse M, Tyson SF (2009) How many body locations need to be tested when assessing sensation after stroke? An investigation of redundancy in the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance. Clin Rehabil 23:91-95
11. Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM et al (1991) The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin Rehabil 5:273-282
12. Nolte CH, Malzahn U, Rakow A et al (2010) The German version of the satisfaction with stroke care questionnaire (SASC) for stroke patients. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 78:355-359
13. Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Nolte CH et al (2005) The reliability of the german version of the barthel-index and the development of a postal and telephone version for the application on stroke patients. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 73:74-82
14. Hatano S (1976) Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ 54:541-553
15. Gwet KL (2008) Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 61:29-48
16. Schori E, Kersten B, Abderhalden C (2006) Wie reliabel ist der Fragebogen zur Analyse der Pflegedokumentation (IzEP-Dok©) im Instrument zur Erfassung von Pflegesystemen IzEP®? PrInterNet http://www.printernet.info/ pf06/pdf/Schori.pdf
17. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT (2007) Somatosensory recovery: a longitudinal study of the first 6 months after unilateral stroke. Disabil Rehabil 29:293-299
18. Carey L, Macdonell R, Matyas TA (2011) SENSe: Study of the Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation on Sensation: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25:304-313
19. Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA (2008) Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin Rehabil 22:758-767
20. Acerra NE, Souvlis T, Moseley GL (2007) Stroke, complex regional pain syndrome and phantom limb pain: can commonalities direct future management? J Rehabil Med 39:109-114
21. Viswanathan V, Snehalatha C, Seena R, Ramachandran A (2002) Early recognition of diabetic neuropathy: evaluation of a simple outpatient procedure using thermal perception. Postgrad Med J 78:541-542
22. Ziegler D, Siekierka-Kleiser E, Meyer B, Schweers M (2005) Validation of a novel screening device (NeuroQuick) for quantitative assessment of small nerve fiberdysfunction as an early feature of diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care 28:1169-1174
23. http://www.deutsche-diabetesgesellschaft.de/redaktion/mitteilungen/ leitlinien/EBL- Neuropathie -Update-2004.pdf
24. Korner-Bitensky N, Kehayia E, Tremblay N et al (2006) Eliciting information on differential sensation of heat in those with and without poststroke aphasia using a visual analogue scale. Stroke 37:471-475
25. Connel LA (2000) Sensory Impairment and recovery after stroke. Thesis University of Nottingham