|
Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 91-95
|
How many body locations need to be tested when assessing sensation after stroke? An investigation of redundancy in the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BODY DISTRIBUTION;
BODY EQUILIBRIUM;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
FEMALE;
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT;
HUMAN;
KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
PATIENT MOBILITY;
PROPRIOCEPTION;
RIVERMEAD ASSESSMENT OF SOMATOSENSORY PERFORMANCE;
SENSORY DYSFUNCTION;
SENSORY EVALUATION;
SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM;
TACTILE STIMULATION;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
WEAKNESS;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
COHORT STUDIES;
ELECTRODIAGNOSIS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHYSICAL STIMULATION;
PROPRIOCEPTION;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SOMATOSENSORY DISORDERS;
STROKE;
TOUCH;
|
EID: 58149350242
PISSN: 02692155
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508097296 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (21)
|
References (12)
|