The CIN4 Chromosomal Instability qPCR Classifier Defines Tumor Aneuploidy and Stratifies Outcome in Grade 2 Breast Cancer

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Szász, Attila Marcell ^a   Li, Qiyuan ^b   Eklund, Aron C ^b   Sztupinszki, Zsófia ^a   Rowan, Andrew ^c   Tokés, Anna Mária ^a   Székely, Borbála ^a   Kiss, András ^a   Szendroi, Miklós ^a   Gyorffy, Balázs ^a   Szállási, Zoltán ^b,d   Swanton, Charles ^c,e   Kulka, Janina ^a,f  

^a SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^d BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f MAV Hospital   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; FORMALDEHYDE; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PARAFFIN; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; AURKA GENE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOGENESIS; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CIN4 GENE; CIN70 GENE; CLASSIFIER; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FOXM1 GENE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MITOSIS INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PLOIDY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOP2A GENE; TPX2 GENE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANEUPLOIDY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PHENOTYPE; PROGNOSIS; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84874458031     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056707     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Carter SL, Eklund AC, Kohane IS, Harris LN, Szallasi Z, (2006) A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers. Nat Genet 38: 1043-1048.
2. Habermann JK, Doering J, Hautaniemi S, Roblick UJ, Bündgen NK, et al. (2009) The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome. Int J Cancer 124: 1552-1564.
3. Swanton C, Nicke B, Schuett M, Eklund AC, Ng C, et al. (2009) Chromosomal instability determines taxane response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 8671-8676.
4. Lee AJX, Endesfelder D, Rowan AJ, Walther A, Birkbak NJ, et al. (2011) Chromosomal Instability Confers Intrinsic Multidrug Resistance. Cancer Research 71: 1858-1870.
5. Birkbak NJ, Eklund AC, Li Q, McClelland SE, Endesfelder D, et al. (2011) Paradoxical Relationship between Chromosomal Instability and Survival Outcome in Cancer. Cancer Res 71: 3447-3452.
6. Roylance R, Endesfelder D, Gorman P, Burrell RA, Sander J, et al. (2011) Relationship of extreme chromosomal instability with long-term survival in a retrospective analysis of primary breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20: 2183-2194.
7. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, (1998) Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396: 643-649.
8. Nakamura H, Saji H, Idiris A, Kawasaki N, Hosaka M, et al. (2003) Chromosomal Instability Detected by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Surgical Specimens of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Is Associated with Poor Survival. Clin Cancer Res 9: 2294-2299.
9. Fiegler H, Geigl JB, Langer S, Rigler D, Porter K, et al. (2007) High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells. Nucl Acids Res 35: e15.
10. Ellsworth R, Hooke J, Love B, Kane J, Patney H, et al. (2008) Correlation of levels and patterns of genomic instability with histological grading of invasive breast tumors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 107: 259-265.
11. Ivshina AV, George J, Senko O, Mow B, Putti TC, et al. (2006) Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res 66: 10292-10301.
12. Dalton LW, Pinder SE, Elston CE, Ellis IO, Page DL, et al. (2000) Histologic Grading of Breast Cancer: Linkage of Patient Outcome with Level of Pathologist Agreement. Mod Pathol 13: 730-735.
13. Toussaint J, Sieuwerts A, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Rouas G, et al. (2009) Improvement of the clinical applicability of the Genomic Grade Index through a qRT-PCR test performed on frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. BMC Genomics 10: 424.
14. Reis-Filho JS, Tutt ANJ, (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology 52: 108-118.
15. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, et al. (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4: 249-264.
16. Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AAM, et al. (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347: 1999-2009.
17. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, et al. (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 2817-2826.
18. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, et al. (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406: 747-752.
19. Ma XJ, Salunga R, Dahiya S, Wang W, Carney E, et al. (2008) A five-gene molecular grade index and HOXB13:IL17BR are complementary prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 2601-2608.
20. Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, Harris A, Fox S, et al. (2006) Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 262-272.
21. Li Q, Birkbak NJ, Gyorffy B, Szallasi Z, Eklund AC, (2011) Jetset: selecting the optimal microarray probe set to represent a gene. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 474.
22. Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Peruzzotti G, Maisonneuve P, Viale G, et al. (2004) Minimal and small size invasive breast cancer with no axillary lymph node involvement: the need for tailored adjuvant therapies. Ann Oncol 15: 1633-1639.
23. Eisenberg E, Levanon EY, (2003) Human housekeeping genes are compact. Trends in Genetics 19: 362-365.
24. Szabo A, Perou C, Karaca M, Perreard L, Quackenbush J, et al. (2004) Statistical modeling for selecting housekeeper genes. Genome Biol 5: R59.
25. Chassevent As, Jourdan M-L, Romain S, Descotes Fo, Colonna M, et al. (2001) S-Phase Fraction and DNA Ploidy in 633 T1T2 Breast Cancers. Clin Cancer Res 7: 909-917.
26. Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G, (2002) Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 6567-6572.
27. Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Lallemand F, Tutt AM, et al. (2007) Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol 25: 1239-1246.
28. McClelland SE, Burrell RA, Swanton C, (2009) Chromosomal instability: A composite phenotype that influences sensitivity to chemotherapy. Cell Cycle 8: 3262-3266.
29. Bakhoum SF, Danilova OV, Kaur P, Levy NB, Compton DA, (2011) Chromosomal Instability Substantiates Poor Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 17: 7704-7711.
30. Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Chaudhri N, Stoltzfus P, Cheng JC, Wilber K, et al. (2002) Detection of Chromosomal Aneuploidies and Gene Copy Number Changes in Fine Needle Aspirates Is a Specific, Sensitive, and Objective Genetic Test for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 62: 2365-2369.
31. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, et al. (2012) Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing. N Engl J Med 366: 883-892.