Adolescent parties and substance use: A situational approach to peer influence

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 162-171

  Gallupe, Owen ^a   Bouchard, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874438617     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akers R.L. Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance 1998, Northeastern University Press, Boston.
2. Akers R.L. Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance 2009, Transaction, Brunswick, N.J.
3. Allison P. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology 1990, 20:93-114.
4. Baerveldt C., Volker B., Van Rossem R. Revisiting selection and influence: An inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice 2008, 50:559-587.
5. Birkbeck C., LaFree G. The situational analysis of crime and delinquency. Annual Review of Sociology 1993, 19:113-137.
6. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method 1969, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7. Boman J.H., Stogner J.M., Miller B.L., Griffin O.H., Krohn M.D. On the operational validity of perceptual peer delinquency: Exploring projection and elements contained in perceptions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2012, 49:601-621.
8. Briar S., Piliavin I. Delinquency, situational inducements, and commitment to conformity. Social Problems 1965, 13:35-45.
9. Brown B.B. Adolescents' relationships with peers. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology 2004, Vol. 2:363-394. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
10. Brown G.W., Harris T. Fall-off in the reporting of life events. Social Psychiatry 1982, 17:23-28.
11. Burgess R.L., Akers R.L. A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems 1966, 14:128-147.
12. Cohen L.E., Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 1979, 44:588-608.
13. Cooley C.H. Human nature and the social order 1922, Scribners, New York. rev ed.
14. Cronbach L.J., Furby L. How we should measure "change" - Or should we?. Psychological Bulletin 1970, 74:68-80.
15. Dijkstra J.K., Lindenberg S., Veenstra R., Steglich C., Isaacs J., Card N.A., et al. Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology 2010, 48:187-220.
16. Go M.-H., Green H.D., Kennedy D.P., Pollard M., Tucker J.S. Peer influence and selection effects on adolescent smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2010, 109:239-242.
17. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life 1959, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
18. Gottfredson M., Hirschi T. A general theory of crime 1990, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
19. Grasmick H.G., Tittle C.R., Bursik R.J., Arneklev B.J. Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1993, 30:5-29.
20. Haynie D.L. Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?. The American Journal of Sociology 2001, 106:1013-1057.
21. Haynie D.L. Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2002, 18:99-134.
22. Heimer K., Matsueda R.L. Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review 1994, 59:365-390.
23. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Schulenberg J.E. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2011: Volume I, Secondary school students 2012, Ann Arbor.
24. Kessler R.C. Use of change scores in criteria in longitudinal survey research. Quality and Quantity 1977, 11:43-66.
25. Kreager D.A. When it's good to be "bad": Violence and adolescent peer acceptance. Criminology 2007, 45:893-923.
26. Kreager D.A., Rulison K., Moody J. Delinquency and the structure of adolescent peer groups. Criminology 2011, 49:95-127.
27. Matsueda R.L. Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. The American Journal of Sociology 1992, 97:1577-1611.
28. McGloin J.M. Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology 2009, 47:439-477.
29. McGloin J.M., Shermer L.O. Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2009, 36:35-72.
30. Mead G.H. Mind, Self and Society 1934, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
31. Monck E., Dobbs R. Measuring life events in an adolescent population: Methodological issues and related findings. Psychological Medicine 1985, 15:841-850.
32. Osgood D.W., Wilson J.K., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Johnston L.D. Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review 1996, 61:635-655.
33. Pratt T.C., Cullen F.T., Sellers C.S., Winfree L.T., Madensen T.D., Daigle L.E., et al. The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly 2010, 27:765-802.
34. Rebellon C.J. Do adolescents engage in delinquency to attract the social attention of peers? An extension and longitudinal test of the social reinforcement hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2006, 43:387-411.
35. Rebellon C.J., Manasse M. Do "bad boys" really get the girls? Delinquency as a cause and consequence of dating behavior among adolescents. Justice Quarterly 2004, 21:355-389.
36. Schwartz R.H., Little D.A.L. Let's party tonight: Drinking patterns and breath alcohol values at high school parties. Family Medicine 1997, 29:326-331.
37. Sijtsema J.J., Ojanen T., Veenstra R., Lindenberg S., Hawley P.H., Little T.D. Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development 2010, 19:515-534.
38. Sutherland E.H., Cressey D.R. Criminology 1978, Vol. 10. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.
39. Warr M. Companions in crime 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
40. Weerman F.M. Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology 2011, 49:253-286.
41. Weerman F.M., Smeenk W.H. Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology 2005, 43:499-524.
42. Wikström P.-O.H. Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime 2004, 1-38. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ. J. McCord (Ed.).
43. Wikström P.-O.H. Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mecha-nisms and the explanation of crime. The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms, and development 2006, 61-107. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. P.-O.H. Wikström, R.J. Sampson (Eds.).
44. Wikström P.-O.H., Ceccato V., Hardie B., Treiber K. Activity fields and the dynamics of crime: Advancing knowledge about the role of the environment in crime causation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2010, 26:55-87.
45. Wikström P.-O.H., Oberwittler D., Treiber K., Hardie B. Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people's urban crime 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
46. Zimmerman G.M. Impulsivity, offending, and the neighborhood: Investigating the person-context nexus. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2010, 26:301-332.