Testing fit to IRT models for polytomously scored items

Handbook of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 185-208

  Glas, Cees A W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874414687     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Aitchison, J., & Silvey, S. D. (1985). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters subject to restraints. Annuals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 813-828.
2. Albert, J. H. (1992). Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response functions using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 251-269.
3. Baker, F. B. (1998). An investigation of item parameter recovery characteristics of a Gibbs sampling procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 153-169.
4. Béguin, A. A., & Glas, C. A. W. (2001). MCMC estimation and some fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika, 66, 541-562.
5. Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of an EM-algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459.
6. Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R. D., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261-280.
7. Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika, 64, 153-168.
8. De Boeck, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer.
9. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm [With discussion]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.
10. Fischer, G. H., & Scheiblechner, H. H. (1970). Algorithmen und Programme für das probabilistische Testmodell von Rasch. Psycholgische Beiträge, 12, 23-51.
11. Fox, J. P., & Glas, C. A. W. (2001). Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling. Psychometrika, 66, 271-288.
12. Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398-409.
13. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The derivation of some tests for the Rasch model from the multinominal distribution. Psychometrika, 53, 525-546.
15. Glas, C. A. W. (1999). Modification indices for the 2pl and the nominal response model. Psychometrika, 64, 273-294.
16. Glas, C. A. W., & Dagohoy, A. V. (2007). A person fit test for IRT models for polytomous items. Psychometrika, 72, 159-180.
17. Glas, C. A. W., & Meijer, R. R. (2003). A Bayesian approach to person fit analysis in item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 217-233.
18. Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1989). Extentions of the partial credit model. Psychometrika, 54, 635-659.
19. Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 69-96). New York: Springer.
20. Hoijtink, H. (2001). Conditional independence and differential item functioning in the two-parameter logistic model. In A. Boomsma, M. A. J. van Duijn, & T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.), Essays on item response theory (pp. 109-130). New York: Springer.
21. Hoijtink, H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1997). A multidimensional item response model: Constrained latent class analysis using the Gibbs sampler and posterior predictive checks. Psychometrika, 62, 171-189.
22. Janssen, R., Tuerlinckx, F., Meulders, M., & de Boeck, P. (2000). A hierarchical IRT model for criterion-referenced measurement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 285-306.
23. Johnson, V. E., & Albert, J. H. (1999). Ordinal data modeling. New York: Springer.
24. Kim, S.-H. (2001). An evaluation of a Markov chain Monte Carlo method for the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 163-176.
25. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
27. Mellenbergh, G. J. (1995). Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 1-32.
28. Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359-381.
29. Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Bayes model estimation in item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 177-195.
30. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159-176.
31. Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates, based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16, 1-32.
32. Patz, R. J., & Junker, B. W. (1999a). A straightforward approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 146-178.
33. Patz, R. J., & Junker, B. W. (1999b). Applications and extensions of MCMC in IRT: Multiple item types, missing data, and rated responses. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 342-366.
34. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
35. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, Monograph 17.
36. Samejima, F. (1973). Homogeneous case of the continuous response model. Psychometrika, 38, 203-219.
37. Sinharay, S. (2003). Bayesian item fit analysis for dichotomous item response theory models (ETS RR-03-34). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
38. Sinharay, S., & Johnson, M. (2003). Simulation studies applying posterior predictive model checking for assessing fit of the common item response theory models. (ETS RR-03-28). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
39. Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling. London: Chapman & Hall.
40. Tutz, G. (1990). Sequential item response models with an ordered response. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 39-55.
41. van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.
42. Verhelst, N. D., & Glas, C. A. W. (1995). The generalized one parameter model: OPLM. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Their foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 215-237). New York: Springer.
43. Verhelst, N. D., Glas, C. A. W., & de Vries, H. H. (1997). A steps model to analyze partial credit. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 123-138). New York: Springer.
44. Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analogue for the 3-PL useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 245-269). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.