SPaM: A combined self-paced reading and masked-priming paradigm

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 143-150

  Luke, Steven G ^a   Christianson, Kiel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexical processing; Masked priming; Psycholinguistics; Reading; Self paced reading; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; READING; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMANS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84874355719     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0239-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1984). The word-by-word reading paradigm: An experimental and theoretical approach. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 31-68). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
2. Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 56-70. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 2. 1. 56.
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2007. 12. 005.
4. Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 183-200. doi: 10. 1080/01690960701579839.
5. Davis, C. J. (2003). Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 67-95). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6. Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 79-103. doi: 10. 1080/09541440340000141.
7. Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641-655. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6.
8. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 10. 4. 680.
9. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251. doi: 10. 1080/14640748708401785.
10. Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 3-37). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 111. 2. 228.
12. Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Masked priming: The state of the art. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
13. Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2012). Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 628-641. doi: 10. 3758/s13421-011-0170-4.
14. Perea, M., Fernández, L., & Rosa, E. (1998). El papel del status léxico y la frecuencia del estímulo-señal en la condición no relacionada con la técnica de presentación enmascarada del estímulo-señal [The role of the lexical status and the frequency of the unrelated prime in the masked priming technique]. Psicológica, 19, 311-319.
15. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196438.
16. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
17. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 124. 3. 372.
18. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2012). The psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
19. Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 514-528. doi: 10. 1037/a0020990.
20. Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509. doi: 10. 3758/BF03214555.
21. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
22. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. doi: 10. 1080/01690960344000198.
23. Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1986). Completion norms for final words of sentences using a multiple production measure. Behavior Research Methods, 18, 363-371. doi: 10. 3758/BF03204419.
24. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (1992). Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 173-184. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 18. 1. 173.
25. Trueswell, J. C., & Kim, A. E. (1998). How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 102-123. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1998. 2565.