Oran Young and international institutions

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-14

  Mitchell, Ronald B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Global environmental governance; International regimes

Indexed keywords

ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL LAW; TYPOLOGY;

ARCTIC;

EID: 84874344431     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9200-3     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77-86.
2. Breitmeier, H., Underdal, A., & Young, O. R. (2011). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. International Studies Review, 13(4), 579-605.
3. Breitmeier, H., Young, O. R., & Zürn, M. (2006). Analyzing international environmental regimes: From case study to database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Brown Weiss, E., & Jacobson, H. K. (Eds.). (1998). Engaging countries: Strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875-902.
6. Cash, D. W. (2001). "In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information... ": cross-scale boundary organizations and agricultural extension. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 431-453.
7. Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., & Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), Article 8.
8. Cash, D. W., & Moser, S. C. (2000). Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10(2), 109-120.
9. Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1995). The new sovereignty: Compliance with international regulatory agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., & Young, O. R. (1971). Political leadership and collective goods. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
11. Gehring, T. (1994). Dynamic international regimes: Institutions for international environmental governance. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.
12. Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2008). Interplay: Exploring institutional interaction. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 187-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2004). Overlapping public and private governance: Can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environmental Politics, 4(2), 75-99.
14. Gupta, J. (2008). Global change: Analyzing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O., & Levy, M. A. (Eds.). (1993). Institutions for the earth: Sources of effective international environmental protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Harsem, Ø., & Hoel, A. H. (2013). Climate change and adaptive capacity in fisheries management: The case of Norway. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
17. Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Underdal, A. (2003a). The Oslo-Potsdam solution to measuring regime effectiveness: Critique, response, and the road ahead. Global Environmental Politics, 3(3), 74-96.
18. Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Underdal, A. (2003b). Regime effectiveness and the Oslo-Potsdam solution: a rejoinder to Oran Young. Global Environmental Politics, 3(3), 105-107.
19. Jinnah, S. (2010). Overlap management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat influence on trade-environment politics. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), 54-79.
20. Keohane, R. O., & Levy, M. A. (Eds.). (1996). Institutions for environmental aid: Pitfalls and promise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7-23.
22. Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(1), 185-205.
23. Levy, M. A., Young, O. R., & Zürn, M. (1995). The study of international regimes. European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 267-330.
24. Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
25. Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Politics and scale: Some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61(1), 169-179.
26. Miles, E. L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjærseth, J. B., & Carlin, E. M. (Eds.). (2002). Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., Cash, D. W., & Dickson, N. (Eds.). (2006). Global environmental assessments: Information and influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (Eds.). (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: Synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (2011). Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (Institutional dimensions of global environmental change). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
30. Osherenko, G., & Young, O. R. (1989). The age of the Arctic: Hot conflicts and cold realities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277-310.
32. Rittberger, V., & Zürn, M. (1991). Regime theory: Findings from the study of East-West regimes. Cooperation and Conflict, 26(4), 165-183.
33. Skjærseth, J. B. (2013). Governance by EU Emissions Trading (ETS): resistance or innovation in the oil industry. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
34. Stokke, O. S. (Ed.). (2001). Governing high seas fisheries: The interplay of global and regional regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
36. Strange, S. (1983). Cave! hic dragones: A critique of regime analysis. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 337-354). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37. Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. In E. L. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjærseth, & E. M. Carlin (Eds.), Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence (pp. 3-45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Underdal, A. (2013). Meeting common environmental challenges: The co-evolution of policies and practices. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
39. Underdal, A., & Young, O. R. (Eds.). (2004). Regime consequences: Methodological challenges and research strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K., & Skolnikoff, E. B. (Eds.). (1998). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Webster, D. G. (2009). Adaptive governance: The dynamics of Atlantic fisheries management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Young, O. R. (1967). The intermediaries: Third parties in international crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Young, O. R. (1968a). Political discontinuities in the international system. World Politics, 20(3), 369-392.
44. Young, O. R. (1968b). The politics of force: Bargaining during international crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Young, O. R. (1968c). Systems of political science (Foundations of modern political science series). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
46. Young, O. R. (1968d). The United Nations and the international system. International Organization, 22(4), 902-922.
47. Young, O. R. (1969). Interdependencies in world politics. International Journal, 24(4), 726-750.
48. Young, O. R. (1972a). Intermediaries: Additional thoughts on third parties. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16(1), 5165.
49. Young, O. R. (1972b). The perils of Odysseus: On constructing theories of international relations. World Politics, 24(Supplement), 179-203.
50. Young, O. R. (1975a). The analysis of bargaining: Problems and prospects. In O. R. Young (Ed.), Bargaining: Formal theories of negotiation (pp. 391-408). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
51. Young, O. R. (1975b). Bargaining: Formal theories of negotiation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
52. Young, O. R. (1977). Resource management at the international level: The case of the North Pacific. New York: Pinter and Nichols.
53. Young, O. R. (1978a). Anarchy and social choice: Reflections on the international polity. World Politics, 30(2), 241-263.
54. Young, O. R. (1978b). On the performance of the international polity. British Journal of International Studies, 4(3), 191-208.
55. Young, O. R. (1979). Compliance and public authority: A theory with international applications. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press.
56. Young, O. R. (1980). International regimes: Problems of concept formation. World Politics, 32(3), 331-356.
57. Young, O. R. (1981). Natural resources and the state: The political economy of resource management (Studies in international political economy). Berkeley: University of California Press.
58. Young, O. R. (1982a). Regime dynamics: The rise and fall of international regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 277-297.
59. Young, O. R. (1982b). Resource regimes: Natural resources and social institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60. Young, O. R. (1985/86). The age of the Arctic. Foreign Policy, 61, 160-179.
61. Young, O. R. (1986). International regimes: Toward a new theory of institutions (review of After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy by Robert O. Keohane; International Regimes by Stephen D. Krasner; and The Antinomies of Interdependence by John G. Ruggie). World Politics, 39(1), 104-122.
62. Young, O. R. (1989a). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
63. Young, O. R. (1989b). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
64. Young, O. R. (1989c). The politics of international regime formation: Managing natural resources and the environment. International Organization, 43(3), 349-376.
65. Young, O. R. (1989d). The power of institutions: why international regimes matter. In O. R. Young (Ed.), International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment (pp. 58-80). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
66. Young, O. R. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45(3), 281-308.
67. Young, O. R. (1992a). Arctic politics: Conflict and cooperation in the circumpolar North. Hanover: University Press of New England.
68. Young, O. R. (1992b). The effectiveness of international institutions: hard cases and critical variables. In J. N. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Change and order in world politics (pp. 160-194). New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Young, O. R. (1993). International organizations and international institutions: Lessons learned from environmental regimes. In S. Kamieniecki (Ed.), Environmental politics in the international arena (pp. 145-164). Albany: State University of New York Press.
70. Young, O. R. (1994a). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
71. Young, O. R. (1994b). The problem of scale in human/environment relationships. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(4), 429-447.
72. Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2(1), 1-24.
73. Young, O. R. (Ed.). (1997). Global governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Young, O. R. (1998). Creating regimes: Arctic accords and international governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
75. Young, O. R. (Ed.). (1999a). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Young, O. R. (1999b). Governance in world affairs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
77. Young, O. R. (2001). The behavioral effects of environmental regimes: Collective-action vs. social-practice models. International Environmental Agreements, 1(1), 9-29.
78. Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Young, O. R. (2003). Determining regime effectiveness: A commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam solution. Global Environmental Politics, 3(3), 97-104.
80. Young, O. R. (2006). Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society, 11(1), Article 27.
81. Young, O. R. (2008a). Building regimes for socioecological systems: Institutional diagnostics. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 115-143). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Young, O. R. (2008b). Institutional interplay: Biosafety and trade. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.
83. Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional dynamics: Emergent patterns in international environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Young, O. R. (2012). On environmental governance: Sustainability, efficiency, and equity (On politics). Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
85. Young, O. R. (2013). Sugaring off: enduring insights from long-term research on environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, this issue.
86. Young, O. R., Demko, G. J., & Ramakrishna, K. (1996). Global environmental change and international governance. Hanover: University Press of New England.
87. Young, O. R., King, L. A., & Schroeder, H. (Eds.). (2008). Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Young, O. R., & Levy, M. A. (1999). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes. In O. R. Young (Ed.), The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Causal connections and behavioral mechanisms (pp. 1-32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Young, O. R., & Osherenko, G. (Eds.). (1993a). Polar politics: Creating international environmental regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
90. Young, O. R., & Osherenko, G. (1993b). Testing theories of regime formation: Findings from a large collaborative research project. In V. Rittberger (Ed.), Regime theory and international relations (pp. 223-251). New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Young, O. R., & Zürn, M. (2006). The international regimes database: Designing and using a sophisticated tool for institutional analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 6(3), 121-143.