Aortic valve replacement: Is porcine or bovine valve better?

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 361-373

  Yap, Kok Hooi ^a   Murphy, Ralph ^a   Devbhandari, Mohan ^a   Venkateswaran, Rajamiyer ^a  

^a WYTHENSHAWE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Bovine; Clinical improvement; Complication; Durability; Haemodynamic; Mortality; Outcome; Porcine; Survival

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COW; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART SURGERY; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MORTALITY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SWINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BENCHMARKING; BIOPROSTHESIS; CATTLE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874323970     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs447     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:405-9.
2. Reichenspurner H, Weinhold Ch, Nollert G, Kaulbach HG, Vetter HO, Boehm DH et al. Comparison of porcine biological valves with pericardial valves-a 12-year clinical experience with 1123 bio-prostheses. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;43:19-26.
3. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:384-8.
4. Chambers JB, Rajani R, Parkin D, Rimington HM, Blauth CI, Venn GE et al. Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:1142-8.
5. Jamieson WRE, Germann E, Aupart MR, Neville PH, Marchand MA, Fradet GJ. 15-Year comparison of supra-annular porcine and perimount aortic bioprostheses. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2006;14:200-5.
6. Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9: 429-38.
7. Casabona R, De Paulis R, Zattera GF, Di Summa M, Bottone W, Stacchino C et al. Stentless porcine and pericardial valve in aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:681-5.
8. Pelletier LC, Carrier M, Leclerc Y, Lepage G, DeGuise P, Dyrda I. Porcine versus pericardial bioprosthesis: a comparison of late results in 1,593 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:352-61.
9. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Keithahn A, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Wagner I et al. Exercise haemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1056-63.
10. Walther T, Lehmann S, Falk V, Metz S, Doll N, Rastan A et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stented xenograft hemodynamic function in the aortic position. Circulation 2004;110(II):II-74-II-78.
11. Czer LS, Matloff JM, Chaux A, DeRobertis MA, Gray RJ. Comparative clinical experience with porcine bioprosthetic and St Jude valve replacement. Chest 1987;91:503-14.
12. Dalmau MJ, Gonalez-Santos JM, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A, Nieto F. One year haemodynamic performance of the Perimount Magna pericardial xenograft and the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a prospective randomized study. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:345-9.
13. Borger MA, Nette AF, Maganti M, Feindel CM. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: A matched hemodynamic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2054-9.
14. Wagner IM, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, Botzenhardt F, Gebauer I, Guenzinger R et al. Influence of completely supre-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise haemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1234-41.
15. Suri RM, Zehr KJ, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Oh JK et al. Left ventricular mass regression after porcine versus bovine aortic valve replacement: a randomized comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1232-7.
16. Dalmau MJ, González-Santos JM, Blázquez JA, Sastre JA, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M et al. Haemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:844-52.