Montreal's municipal guidelines for participation and public hearings: Assessing context, process and outcomes

Canadian Journal of Urban Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2012, Pages 106-131

  Aubin, Raphaëlle ^a   Bornstein, Lisa ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Montr al; Public hearings; Public participation; Urban development projects

Indexed keywords

LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL POLICY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

CANADA; MONTREAL; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84874319856     PISSN: 11883774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abelson, J., and F. Gauvin. 2006. Assessing the impacts of public participation: concepts, evidence and policy implications. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
2. Alterman, R., D. Harris, and M. Hill. 1984. The impact of public participation on planning: The case of Derbyshire structure plan. The Town Planning Review 55 ( 2): 177-196.
3. Action Gardien. 2008. Mémoire déposé par Action-Gardien dans le cadre des consultations sur le Projet Griffintown. Accessed July 20, 2010. http:// ville.montreal.qc.ca/pls/portal/docs/page/arr so fr/media/documents/ actiongardien.pdf.
4. Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35 ( 4): 216-224.
5. Beierle, T.C., and D. M. Konisky. 2000. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 ( 4): 587-602.
6. Bickerstaff, K., and G. Walker. 2001. Participatory local governance and transport planning. Environment and Planning 33: 431 -51.
7. Blahna, D. J., and S. Yonts-Shepard. 1989. Public involvement in resource planning: toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Society and Natural Resources 2: 209-27.
8. Bornstein, L. 2010. Mega-projects, city-building and community benefits. City, Culture, Society 1( 4): 199-206.
9. Breux, S, L. Bhérer, and J-P. Collin. 2004. Les mécanismes de participation publique à la gestion municipale. Montréal INRS-Urbanisation, Culture et Société, http://www.vrm.ca/
10. Brody, S., D. Godschalk, and R. Burby. 2003. Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (3): 245-264. (Pubitemid 37050201)
11. CIQ (Concertation Interquartier). 2009. CIQ public meeting: question and answer session, Notre-Dame-des-Grace. January 29. Research observations. CIQ (Concertation Interquartier). 2006. Processus verbal, CIQ meeting, December 11.
12. Concertation Interquartier - McGiIl University Health Centre. 2004. Partnership agreement.
13. Coglianese, C. 1997. Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking. Duke Law Journal 46 ( 6): 1255-1349.
14. Crosby, N., J. M. Kelly, and P. Schaefer. 1986. Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review 46: 170-78.
15. D'Aquino, P. 2007. Empowerment and participation: how could the wide range of social effects of participatory approaches be better elicited and compared? France: Cirad.
16. Devimco. 2007. Griffintown project is developed through consultation - The City of Montreal given the green light to develop a programme particulier d'urbanisme (PPU). [Press release]. November 22. Accessed July 20, 2010. http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/November2007/22/c3227. html.
17. Devimco. 2008. New improvement for the Griffintown Project - Devimco responds to City of Montreal and citizen demands after actively participating in consultations and discussions. [Press release]. April 24. Accessed July 20, 2010. http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/April2008/24/c9071.html.
18. Fischler, R. 2007. The problems with the Griffintown project. The Gazette. December 2.
19. Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Forester, J. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning process. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Gariépy, M., and M. Gauthier. 2009. Le débat public en urbanisme à Montréal :un instrument de développement urbain durable? Canadian Journal of Urban Research 18 ( 1): 48-73.
22. Godschalk, D. R., and B. Stiftel. 1981. Making waves: public participation in state water planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17 ( 4): 597-614.
23. Hamel, P. 1999. La consultation publique et les limites de la participation des citoyens aux affaires urbaines. Recherches sociographiques 40 ( 3): 435-466.
24. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver: UBC Press.
25. Innés, J., and D. Booher. 2005. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice 5 ( 4): 419-436.
26. Jouvé, B. 2005. La démocratie en métropoles: gouvernance, participation et citoyenneté. Revue française de science politique 55 ( 2): 317-337.
27. Kathlene, L., and J. Martin. 1991. Enhancing citizen participation: panel designs, perspectives and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis 10 ( 1): 46-63.
28. King C, K. Feltey, and B. O'Neill Susel. 1998. The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review 58 ( 4): 317-326.
29. Landry, J., and L. Angeles. 2011. Institutionalizing participation in municipal policy development: preliminary lessons from a start-up process in PlateauMont-Royal. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 20 ( 1): 105-131.
30. Latendresse, A. 2008. Lïémergence des sommets citoyens de Montréal : vers la construction d'un programme autour du droit à la ville? Nouvelles pratiques sociales 21( 1): 104-120.
31. MacNair, R. H., R. Caldwell, and L. Pollane. 1983. Citizen participants in public bureaucracies: foul-weather friends. Administration & Society 14 ( 4): 507-23.
32. NDG Community Council. 2008. Public consultations - Is anyone listening? NDG 2020 Public Assembly. October 21. Research observations.
33. NDG Community Council. 2006. Impacts of the MUHC on its neighbours: circulation and traffic. NDG 2020 Public Assembly. November 29. Research observations.
34. OCPM - Office de la consultation publique de Montréal. 2010a. Les cahiers de rOCPM - s'approprier la ville: Bilan 2006-2009 des activités de l'OCPM et exemples d'ailleurs en consultation publique. Accessed July 20, 2010. http:// www.ocpm.qc.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/cahier2010.pdf.
35. OCPM-OfficedelaconsultationpubliquedeMontréal. 2010b. Rapportannuel2009. http://www.ocpm.qc.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/rapportannuel/ 2009/2009.pdf.
36. OCPM-OfficedelaconsultationpubliquedeMontréal. 2010c. Rapportannuel2009. http://www.ocpm.qc.ca/sites/default/Ues/pdf/rapportannuel/ 2009/2009.pdf.
37. OCPM-OfficedelaconsultationpubliquedeMontréal. 2009a. Rapport annuel2008. http://www.ocpm.qc.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/rapportannuel/2008/ 2008.pdf.
38. OCPM-OfficedelaconsultationpubliquedeMontréal. 2007. Rapportannuel2007. http://www.ocpm.qc.ca/sites/default/iles/pdf/rapportannuel/ 2007/2007en.pdf.
39. Office de la consultation publique de Montréal. 2005a. Rapport de consultation publique: Centre universitaire de santé McGiIl (CUSM). Accessed July 20,2010. http://www.ocpm.qc.ca/sites/default/files/rapports/ rapport cusm.pdf.
40. Office de la consultation publique de Montréal. 2005b. Transcriptions CUSM ( June 15,2005). Accessed July 20,2010. http://www.ocpm.qc. ca/consultationspubliques/centre-universitaire-de-sante-mcgill-cusm.
41. Projet Griffintown: des citoyens expriment des inquiétudes. 2008. La Presse. February 26. http://www.monquebec.net/actualites quebec/!che news.php?news=512
42. Projet Griffintown - L'Office de consultation publique de Montréal doit être utilisé.
43. Le Devoir. March 21. http://www.ledevoir.eom/2008/03/21 /181466.
44. html. Province de Québec. Le Comité consultatif d'urbanisme. Accessed July 20,2010.
45. http://www.mamrot.gouv.qc.ca/amenagement/outils/amen outi acte comi.asp
46. RÉSO. 2008. The Griffintown project has the potential to create a high-quality living environment. What we need are guarantees to ensure it meets the SudOuest's needs. RESO Info 16( 1). Accessed July 20, 2010. http://www.resomtl. com/docs//Microsoft%20Word%20- %20resoinfomars08atraduireanglais.pdf.
47. R.S.Q. 2006. Chapter Q-2, sections 31,31.1,31.3,31.9 and 124.1, Environmental Quality Act. Accessed August 1,2012. http://www.bape.gouv.qc.ca/ sections/ documentation/Q-2-r23-anglais.pdf.
48. R.S.Q. 2012a. Chapter A-19.1, An Act Respecting Land Use Planning and Development, Updatedtol August2012. http://www2.publicationsduquebec. gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=2&file=/A 19 1/ A19 1 A.html.
49. R.S.Q. 2012b. Chapter C-11.4: Charter of Ville de Montréal, Updated to 1 August 2012. http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/ dynamicSearch/ telecharge.php?type=2&file=/C 11 4/C11 4 A.html.
50. Rosener, J. 1978. Citizen participation: can we measure its effectiveness. Public Administration Review 38 ( 5): 457-463.
51. Rosener, J. 1981. User-oriented evaluation: A new way to view citizen participation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17: 583-596.
52. Rowe, G., and L. Frewer. 2004. Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda. Science Technology Human Values 29: 512-556.
53. Rowe, G., and L. Frewer. 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology Human Values 30: 251-290. (Pubitemid 40465733)
54. Sheedy, A. 2008. Handbook on citizen engagement: beyond consultation. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
55. Statutes of Canada. 2003. Bill C-9: An Act to Amend the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, Royal Assent: 11 June 2003. Accessed August 1, 2012. http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/ LegislativeSummaries/Bills ls.asp?lang=E8ds=c9&Parl=37&Ses=2&sourc e=library prb#clause20txt.
56. Ville de Montréal, (n. d.). The challenge of participation: Montreal's policy on public participation and consultation. Accessed July 20, 2010. http:// ville.montreal.qc.ca/pls/portal/docs/page/prt vdm fr/media/documents/ consultation participation en.pdf.
57. Ville de Montréal. 2005a. Interaction with the public: A practical guide for private, public or community developers. Accessed July 20, 2010. http:// ville.montreal.qc.ca/pls/portal/docs/page/guide consultation en/media/ documents/guide promoteurs 210605 en.pdf.
58. Ville de Montréal. 2005b. Taking part in public consultation: becoming informed, asking questions and expressing opinions - a practical guide for Citizens. Accessed July 20,2010. http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/pls/portal/ docs/ page/guide consultation en/media/documents/guide citoyens 210605 en.pdf.
59. Ville de Montréal - Arrondissement du Sud-Ouest. 2008a. Consultation publiques: Griffintown - consultation publique. Accessed July 20,2010. http://ville.montreal. qc.ca/portal/page? pageid=81,14951980& dad=portal& schema=PORTAT.
60. Ville de Montréal - Arrondissement du Sud-Ouest. 2008b. Rapport de l'assemblée publique de consultation. Accessed July 20, 2010. http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/ pls/portal/docs/page/arr-so-fr/media/documents/ rapport-assemblee- publique-consultation-griffintown.pdf.
61. Ville de Montréal. 2006. Charte montréalaise des droits et responsabilités. Accessed August 4, 2012. http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/ pls/portal/docs/page/ charte mtl fr/media/documents/charte montréalaise des droits et resp onsabilites %28janvier 2012%29.pdf.
62. Webler, T. 1999. The craft and theory of public participation: A dialectical process. Journal of Risk Research 2 ( 1): 55-71.