The role of extensionists in Santa Catarina, Brazil, In the adoption and rejection of providing pain relief to calves for dehorning

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1535-1548

  Hotzel M J ^a   Sneddon, J N ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Attitude; Education; Theory of planned behavior

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BRAZIL; CATTLE; DAIRYING; HORN; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; PAIN;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ATTITUDE; BRAZIL; CATTLE; DAIRYING; HORNS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PAIN; PAIN MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84874306752     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5780     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 1991, 50:179-211.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Barr N. I hope you are feeling uncomfortable now: Role conflict and the natural resources extension officer. Changing Land Management: Adoption of New Practices 2011, 129-140. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, VIC, Australia. D.J. Pannell, F. Vanclay (Eds.).
4. Bayvel A.C.D. Science-based animal welfare standards: The international role of the Office International des épizooties. Anim. Welf. 2004, 13:S163-S169.
5. Brasil. 2006. Presidência da República, Casa Civil. Lei No. 11.326, de 24 de julho de 2006. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
6. Brasil. 2008. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa No. 56, de 6 de novembro de 2008. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
7. Buller H., Morris C. Farm animal welfare: A new repertoire of nature-society relations or modernism re-embedded?. Sociol. Ruralis 2003, 43:216-237.
8. Burton R.J.F., Paragahawewa U.H. Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes. J. Rural Stud. 2011, 27:95-104.
9. Caporal F.R. A extensão rural e os limites à prática dos extensionistas do serviço público 1991, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
10. Cardoso C.S., Uller-Gomez C., Hötzel M.J. Decision-making of family farmers in Santa Catarina regarding husbandry practices that influence the welfare of dairy cattle. Proc 2012, 1-3. XLIX Reunião da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBC). (SBC), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
11. Cazella, A. A., P. Bonnal, and R. S. Maluf. 2009. Agricultura familiar: Multifuncionalidade e desenvolvimento territorial no Brasil. Mauad Editora Ltda., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
12. Centner T.J. Limitations on the confinement of food animals in the United States. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2010, 23:469-486.
13. CFMV (Conselho Federal de Medicina Veterinária). 2008. Conselho Federal de Medicina Veterinária-Resolução No. 877, de 15 de feverio de 2008. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
14. Chaddad F.R., Jank M.S. The evolution of agricultural policies and agribusiness development in Brazil. Choices (N.Y. N.Y.) 2006, 21:85-90.
15. Clemente E.C., Hespanhol A.N. Restructuring production of dairy cattle: space organization-production on " watershed cows" to " space circuit production" Geonordeste 2010, 1:151-174.
16. Coleman G.J., McGregor M., Hemsworth P.H., Boyce J., Dowling S. The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 82:189-200.
17. Costa, J. H. C., L. F. Balcão, R. R. Darós, F. Bertoli, and M. J. Hötzel. 2011. Handling of painful procedures in dairy calf management in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Page 101 in Proc. 45th Congr. Int. Soc. Appl. Ethol., Indianapolis, IN.
18. Costa J.H.C., Hötzel M.J., Longo C., Balcão L.F. A survey of management practices that influence production and welfare of dairy cattle on family farms in southern Brazil. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:307-317.
19. Dockès A.C., Kling-Eveillard F. Farmers' and advisers' representations of animals and animal welfare. Livest. Sci. 2006, 103:234-249.
20. Duffield, T. 2008. Current data on dehorning calves. Pages 25-28 in 41st Annu. Conv. Proc. Am. Assoc. Bovine Pract., Charlotte, NC. Am. Assoc. Bovine Pract., Auburn, AL.
21. Duffield T.F., Heinrich A., Millman S.T., DeHaan A., James S., Lissemore K. Reduction in pain response by combined use of local lidocaine anesthesia and systemic ketoprofen in dairy calves dehorned by heat cauterization. Can. Vet. J. 2010, 51:283-288.
22. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1989, 14:532-550.
23. EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária). 2011. Produção de leite, vacas ordenhadas e produtividade animal no Brasil, EMBRAPA Gado de Leite - 1980/2010. Accessed Jan. 2012. http://www.cnpgl.embrapa.br/nova/informacoes/estatisticas/producao/tabela0230.php.
24. Fajt V.R., Wagner S.A., Norby B. Analgesic drug administration and attitudes about analgesia in cattle among bovine practitioners in the United States. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011, 238:755-767.
25. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2011. FAOSTAT. Accessed May 2012. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.
26. Faulkner P.M., Weary D.M. Reducing pain after dehorning in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:2037-2041.
27. Fraser D. Toward a global perspective on farm animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 113:330-339.
28. Gottardo F., Nalon E., Contiero B., Normando S., Dalvit P., Cozzi G. The dehorning of dairy calves: Practices and opinions of 639 farmers. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:5724-5734.
29. Heleski C.R., Mertig A.G., Zanella A.J. Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82:2806-2814.
30. Hewson C.J., Baranyiová E., Broom D.M., Cockram M.S., Galdino F., Hanlon A.J., Hänninen L., Lexer D., Mellor D.J., Molento C.F.M., ödberg F.O., Serpell J.A., Sisto A.M., Stafford K.J., Stookey J.M., Waldau P. Approaches to teaching animal welfare at 13 veterinary schools worldwide. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2005, 32:422-437.
31. Hewson C.J., Dohoo I.R., Lemke K.A., Barkema H.W. Factors affecting Canadian veterinarians' use of analgesics when dehorning beef and dairy calves. Can. Vet. J. 2007, 48:1129-1136.
32. Hoe F.G.H., Ruegg P.L. Opinions and practices of Wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal well-being. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:2297-2308.
33. Huxley J.N., Whay H.R. Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2006, 159:662-668.
34. Huxley J.N., Whay H.R. Attitudes of UK veterinary surgeons and cattle farmers to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Cattle Pract. 2007, 15:189-193.
35. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2006. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Brazil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Agropecuário 2006. Accessed Jan. 2012. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/agropecuaria/censoagro/default.shtm.
36. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2009. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Brazil. Accessed Jan. 2012. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2009/tabelas_pdf/tab01.pdf.
37. ICEPA (Instituto de Planejamento e Economia Agrícola de Santa Catarina). 2011. Síntese Anual da Agricultura de Santa Catarina - 2010/2011. Accessed Jan. 2012. http://cepa.epagri.sc.gov.br/.
38. Karam, K. F. and L. A. S. de Freitas. 2008. Pesquisa, extensão e aprendizagem participativa-PEAP: subsídios teórico-metológicos.
39. Keong Y.O., Hirst G. An empirical integration of goal orientation and the theory of planned behaviour: Predicting innovation adoption behaviour. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Innov. 2010, 11:5-18.
40. Kochen M. Are MIS frameworks premature?. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 1985, 2:92-100.
41. Kristensen E., Østergaard S., Krogh M.A., Enevoldsen C. Technical indicators of financial performance in the dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:620-631.
42. Läpple, D., and H. Kelley. 2010. Understanding farmers' uptake of organic farming: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Proc. 84th Annu. Conf. Agric. Econ. Soc. http://purl.umn.edu/91949.
43. Laven R.A., Huxley J.N., Hay H.R.W., Stafford K.J. Results of a survey of attitudes of dairy veterinarians in New Zealand regarding painful procedures and conditions in cattle. N. Z. Vet. J. 2009, 57:215-220.
44. Martinelli L.A., Naylor R., Vitousek P.M., Moutinho P. Agriculture in Brazil: Impacts, costs, and opportunities for a sustainable future. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2010, 2:431-438.
45. Miles, M.B., and A.M.Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods 1994, Sage Publications, London, UK.
46. Misch L.J., Duffield T.F., Millman S.T., Lissemore K.D. An investigation into the practices of dairy producers and veterinarians in dehorning dairy calves in Ontario. Can. Vet. J. 2007, 48:1249-1254.
47. Molento C.F.M. Animal welfare teaching in the veterinary medicine and animal science programs. Ciência Veterinária nos Trópicos 2008, 11:6-12.
48. Molento C.F.M., Calderón N. Essential directions for teaching animal welfare in South America. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2009, 28:617-625.
49. Paulilo M.I., Grandi A.B., Silva M.M. Mulher e atividade leiteira: A dupla face da exclusão. Cadernos de Pesquisa PPGSP/UFSC 2000, 21:16-28.
50. Phillips C. Cattle Behaviour and Welfare 2002, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK. 2nd.
51. Phillips C. The welfare of animals: The silent majority. Animal Welfare. No. 8 2009, Springer, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
52. Poletto R., Hötzel M.J. The five freedoms in the global animal agriculture market: Challenges and achievements as opportunities for the present and future. Anim. Front. 2012, 2:22-30.
53. Rollin C. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers 1993, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
54. Röling N.G. Extension Science: Information Systems in Agricultural Development 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
55. Rollin B.E. Why is agricultural animal welfare important? The social and ethical context. Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach 2010, 21-31. CAB International, Cambridge, MA. T. Grandin (Ed.).
56. Rushen J., de Passillé A.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. The Welfare of Cattle Animal Welfare and Nutrition 2008, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
57. Ruttan V.W. What happened to technology adoption-diffusion research?. Sociol. Ruralis 1996, 36:51-73.
58. Schneider S., Niederle P.A. Resistance strategies and diversification of rural livelihoods: The construction of autonomy among Brazilian family farmers. J. Peasant Stud. 2010, 37:379-405.
59. Stafford K.J., Mellor D.J. Addressing the pain associated with disbudding and dehorning in cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 135:226-231.
60. Stilwell G., Campos de Carvalho R., Lima M.S., Broom M.D. Effect of caustic paste disbudding, using local anaesthesia with and without analgesia, on behaviour and cortisol of calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116:35-44.
61. Tadich N.A., Molento C.F.M., Gallo C.B. Teaching animal welfare in some veterinary schools in Latin America. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2010, 37:69-73.
62. Telles T.S., Ueda Tanaka J.M., Pellini T. Household farmers: Dairy production as a locus of public policies in Paraná State, Brazil. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 2008, 29:579-590.
63. Thomsen P.T., Gidekull M., Herskin M.S., Huxley J.N., Pedersen A.R., Ranheim B., Whay H.R. Scandinavian bovine practitioners' attitudes to the use of analgesic in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2010, 167:256-258.
64. Vasseur E., Borderas F., Cue R.L., Lefebvre D., Pellerin D., Rushen J., Wade K.M., Passillé A.M. A survey of dairy calf management practices in Canada that affect animal welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:1307-1315.
65. Vickers K.J., Niel L., Kiehlbauch L.M., Weary D.M. Calf response to caustic paste and hot-iron dehorning using sedation with and without local anesthetic. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:1454-1459.
66. Whay H.R., Huxley J.N. Pain relief in cattle: A practitioner's perspective. Cattle Pract. 2005, 13:81-85.