Resurrecting remnants: The lives of post-mitotic midbodies

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 118-128

  Chen, Chun Ting ^a   Ettinger, Andreas W ^b   Huttner, Wieland B ^c   Doxsey, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abscission; Asymmetry; Cell fates; Cytokinesis; Midbody; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; ESCRT PROTEIN;

BIOGENESIS; CELL MIGRATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL VACUOLE; CYTOKINESIS; MACROAUTOPHAGY; MICROTUBULE; MIDBODY; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; AUTOPHAGY; CYTOKINESIS; ENDOSOMAL SORTING COMPLEXES REQUIRED FOR TRANSPORT; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84874282350     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.10.012     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Guizetti J., Gerlich D.W. Cytokinetic abscission in animal cells. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 21:909-916.
2. Barr F.A., Gruneberg U. Cytokinesis: placing and making the final cut. Cell 2007, 131:847-860.
3. Gromley A., et al. Centriolin anchoring of exocyst and SNARE complexes at the midbody is required for secretory-vesicle-mediated abscission. Cell 2005, 123:75-87.
4. Prekeris R., Gould G.W. Breaking up is hard to do - membrane traffic in cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:1569-1576.
5. Caballe A., Martin-Serrano J. ESCRT machinery and cytokinesis: the road to daughter cell separation. Traffic 2011, 12:1318-1326.
6. Connell J.W., et al. Spastin couples microtubule severing to membrane traffic in completion of cytokinesis and secretion. Traffic 2009, 10:42-56.
7. Guizetti J., et al. Cortical constriction during abscission involves helices of ESCRT-III-dependent filaments. Science 2011, 331:1616-1620.
8. Carlton J.G., Martin-Serrano J. Parallels between cytokinesis and retroviral budding: a role for the ESCRT machinery. Science 2007, 316:1908-1912.
9. Elia N., et al. Dynamics of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery during cytokinesis and its role in abscission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:4846-4851.
10. Pohl C., Jentsch S. Final stages of cytokinesis and midbody ring formation are controlled by BRUCE. Cell 2008, 132:832-845.
11. Mukai A., et al. Dynamic regulation of ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation at the central spindle during cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:1325-1333.
12. Fabbro M., et al. Cdk1/Erk2- and Plk1-dependent phosphorylation of a centrosome protein, Cep55, is required for its recruitment to midbody and cytokinesis. Dev. Cell 2005, 9:477-488.
13. Zhao W.M., et al. Cep55, a microtubule-bundling protein, associates with centralspindlin to control the midbody integrity and cell abscission during cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17:3881-3896.
14. Ganem N.J., et al. Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17:157-162.
15. Gromley A., et al. A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161:535-545.
16. Mullins J.M., Biesele J.J. Terminal phase of cytokinesis in D-98s cells. J. Cell Biol. 1977, 73:672-684.
17. Marzesco A.M., et al. Release of extracellular membrane particles carrying the stem cell marker prominin-1 (CD133) from neural progenitors and other epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:2849-2858.
18. Dubreuil V., et al. Midbody and primary cilium of neural progenitors release extracellular membrane particles enriched in the stem cell marker prominin-1. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:483-495.
19. Ettinger A.W., et al. Proliferating versus differentiating stem and cancer cells exhibit distinct midbody-release behaviour. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:503.
20. Jantsch-Plunger V., et al. CYK-4: A Rho family gtpase activating protein (GAP) required for central spindle formation and cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 149:1391-1404.
21. Goss J.W., Toomre D.K. Both daughter cells traffic and exocytose membrane at the cleavage furrow during mammalian cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:1047-1054.
22. Kuo T.C., et al. Midbody accumulation through evasion of autophagy contributes to cellular reprogramming and tumorigenicity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1214-1223.
23. Pohl C., Jentsch S. Midbody ring disposal by autophagy is a post-abscission event of cytokinesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:65-70.
24. Flemming W. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Zelle. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. 1891, 37:685-751. (in German).
25. Mullins J.M., Biesele J.J. Cytokinetic activities in a human cell line: the midbody and intercellular bridge. Tissue Cell 1973, 5:47-61.
26. Byers B., Abramson D.H. Cytokinesis in HeLa: post-telophase delay and microtubule-associated motility. Protoplasma 1968, 66:413-435.
27. Buck R.C., Tidsale J.M. An electron microscopic study of the cleavage furrow in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 1962, 13:117-125.
28. Buck R.C., Tisdale J.M. The fine structure of the mid-body of the rat erythroblast. J. Cell Biol. 1962, 13:109-115.
29. Jones O.P. Elimination of midbodies from mitotic erythroblasts and their contribution to fetal blood plasma. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 1969, 42:753-759.
30. Robbins E., Gonatas N.K. The ultrastructure of a mammalian cell during the mitotic cycle. J. Cell Biol. 1964, 21:429-463.
31. Paweletz N. On the function of the " Flemming body" during division of animal cells. Naturwissenschaften 1967, 54:533-535.
32. Moll E., Paweletz N. Membranes of the mitotic apparatus of mammalian cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1980, 21:280-287.
33. Brinkley B.R., Cartwright J. Ultrastructural analysis of mitotic spindle elongation in mammalian cells in vitro. Direct microtubule counts. J. Cell Biol. 1971, 50:416-431.
34. Hepler P.K., Jackson W.T. Microtubules and early stages of cell-plate formation in the endosperm of Haemanthus katherinae Baker. J. Cell Biol. 1968, 38:437-446.
35. Otegui M.S., et al. Midbodies and phragmoplasts: analogous structures involved in cytokinesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:404-413.
36. Sanger J.M., et al. Midbody sealing after cytokinesis in embryos of the sea urchin Arabacia punctulata. Cell Tissue Res. 1985, 240:287-292.
37. Schmidt K., Nichols B.J. A barrier to lateral diffusion in the cleavage furrow of dividing mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:1002-1006.
38. Steigemann P., et al. Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell 2009, 136:473-484.
39. McIntosh J.R., Landis S.C. The distribution of spindle microtubules during mitosis in cultured human cells. J. Cell Biol. 1971, 49:468-497.
40. Schiel J.A., et al. Endocytic membrane fusion and buckling-induced microtubule severing mediate cell abscission. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:1411-1424.
41. Elad N., et al. Microtubule organization in the final stages of cytokinesis as revealed by cryo-electron tomography. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:207-215.
42. Wilson G.M., et al. The FIP3-Rab11 protein complex regulates recycling endosome targeting to the cleavage furrow during late cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:849-860.
43. Skop A.R., et al. Dissection of the mammalian midbody proteome reveals conserved cytokinesis mechanisms. Science 2004, 305:61-66.
44. Skop A.R., et al. Completion of cytokinesis in C. elegans requires a brefeldin A-sensitive membrane accumulation at the cleavage furrow apex. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:735-746.
45. Low S.H., et al. Syntaxin 2 and endobrevin are required for the terminal step of cytokinesis in mammalian cells. Dev. Cell 2003, 4:753-759.
46. Fielding A.B., et al. Rab11-FIP3 and FIP4 interact with Arf6 and the exocyst to control membrane traffic in cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2005, 24:3389-3399.
47. Cascone I., et al. Distinct roles of RalA and RalB in the progression of cytokinesis are supported by distinct RalGEFs. EMBO J. 2008, 27:2375-2387.
48. Simon G.C., et al. Sequential Cyk-4 binding to ECT2 and FIP3 regulates cleavage furrow ingression and abscission during cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1791-1803.
49. Gaietta G.M., et al. Golgi twins in late mitosis revealed by genetically encoded tags for live cell imaging and correlated electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:17777-17782.
50. Morita E., et al. Human ESCRT and ALIX proteins interact with proteins of the midbody and function in cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2007, 26:4215-4227.
51. Carlton J.G., et al. Differential requirements for Alix and ESCRT-III in cytokinesis and HIV-1 release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:10541-10546.
52. Samson R.Y., et al. A role for the ESCRT system in cell division in Archaea. Science 2008, 322:1710-1713.
53. Spitzer C., et al. The Arabidopsis elch mutant reveals functions of an ESCRT component in cytokinesis. Development 2006, 133:4679-4689.
54. Raiborg C., Stenmark H. The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature 2009, 458:445-452.
55. McDonald B., Martin-Serrano J. No strings attached: the ESCRT machinery in viral budding and cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:2167-2177.
56. Wollert T., et al. The ESCRT machinery at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:2163-2166.
57. Lee H.H., et al. Midbody targeting of the ESCRT machinery by a noncanonical coiled coil in CEP55. Science 2008, 322:576-580.
58. Yang D., et al. Structural basis for midbody targeting of spastin by the ESCRT-III protein CHMP1B. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1278-1286.
59. Samson R.Y., Bell S.D. Ancient ESCRTs and the evolution of binary fission. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17:507-513.
60. Schiel J.A., et al. FIP3-endosome-dependent formation of the secondary ingression mediates ESCRT-III recruitment during cytokinesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:1068-1078.
61. Mizuno E., et al. A deubiquitinating enzyme UBPY regulates the level of protein ubiquitination on endosomes. Traffic 2006, 7:1017-1031.
62. Row P.E., et al. The MIT domain of UBPY constitutes a CHMP binding and endosomal localization signal required for efficient epidermal growth factor receptor degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:30929-30937.
63. Cecconi F., Levine B. The role of autophagy in mammalian development: cell makeover rather than cell death. Dev. Cell 2008, 15:344-357.
64. Levine B., Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 2008, 132:27-42.
65. Klionsky D.J. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:931-937.
66. Kosodo Y., et al. Asymmetric distribution of the apical plasma membrane during neurogenic divisions of mammalian neuroepithelial cells. EMBO J. 2004, 23:2314-2324.
67. Wilcock A.C., et al. Mitotic spindle orientation distinguishes stem cell and terminal modes of neuron production in the early spinal cord. Development 2007, 134:1943-1954.
68. Pollarolo G., et al. Cytokinesis remnants define first neuronal asymmetry in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1525-1533.
69. Corbeil D., et al. Prominin-1: a distinct cholesterol-binding membrane protein and the organisation of the apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells. Subcell. Biochem. 2010, 51:399-423.
70. Jurgens G. Plant cytokinesis: fission by fusion. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:277-283.
71. Allenspach A.L., Roth L.E. Structural variations during mitosis in the chick embryo. J. Cell Biol. 1967, 33:179-196.
72. Pickett J.A., Edwardson J.M. Compound exocytosis: mechanisms and functional significance. Traffic 2006, 7:109-116.
73. Bi E., Park H.O. Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genetics 2012, 191:347-387.
74. Chant J., Pringle J.R. Patterns of bud-site selection in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 129:751-765.
75. Tong Z., et al. Adjacent positioning of cellular structures enabled by a Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein-mediated zone of inhibition. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:1375-1384.
76. Marston A.L., et al. A localized GTPase exchange factor, Bud5, determines the orientation of division axes in yeast. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:803-807.
77. Halme A., et al. Bud10p directs axial cell polarization in budding yeast and resembles a transmembrane receptor. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6:570-579.
78. Hyman A.A. Centrosome movement in the early divisions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a cortical site determining centrosome position. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 109:1185-1193.
79. Waddle J.A., et al. Transient localized accumulation of actin in Caenorhabditis elegans blastomeres with oriented asymmetric divisions. Development 1994, 120:2317-2328.
80. Keating H.H., White J.G. Centrosome dynamics in early embryos of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111:3027-3033.
81. Skop A.R., White J.G. The dynactin complex is required for cleavage plane specification in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8:1110-1116.
82. Pichler S., et al. OOC-3, a novel putative transmembrane protein required for establishment of cortical domains and spindle orientation in the P(1) blastomere of C. elegans embryos. Development 2000, 127:2063-2073.
83. Hyman A.A., White J.G. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 105:2123-2135.