From reference to sense: How the brain encodes meaning for speaking

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue JAN, 2012, Pages

  Menenti, Laura ^a,b   Petersson, Karl Magnus ^a,c   Hagoort, Peter ^a,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Conceptual representation; FMRI; FMRI adaptation; Language production; Semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874277572     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00384     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25,151-188.
2. Buur, P. F., Poser, B. A., and Norris, D. G. (2009). A dual echo approach to removing motion artefacts in fMRI time series. NMR Biomed. 22, 551-560.
3. Conrad, N., Giabbiconi, C.-M., Müller, M. M., and Gruber, T. (2007). Neuronal correlates of repetition priming of frequently presented objects: insights from induced gamma band responses. Neurosci. Lett. 429,126-130.
4. Frege, G. (1892). On sense and nom-inatum, in The Philosophy of Language, 2nd Edn, ed. A. P. Mar-tinich (New York: Oxford University Press), 190-192.
5. Friston, K. J., Holmes, A., Worsley, K., Poline, J.-B., Frith, C., and Frack-owiak, R. (1995). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum. Brain Mapp.2, 189-210.
6. Friston, K. J., Penny, W. D., and Glaser, D. E. (2005). Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 25, 661-667.
7. Gagnepain, P., Chetelat, G., Landeau, B., Dayan, J., Eustache, F., and Lebreton, K. (2008). Spoken word memory traces within the human auditory cortex revealed by repetition priming and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 28, 5281-5289.
8. Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., and Menon,V. (2003). Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100,253-258.
9. Griswold, M. A., Jakob, P. M., Hei-demann, R. M., Nittka, M., Jel-lus, V., Wang, J., Kiefer, B., and Haase, A. (2002). Generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 1202-1210.
10. Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul Ed.) 9,416-423.
11. Hasson, U., Nusbaum, H. C., and Small, S. L. (2007). Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2899-2913.
12. Henson, R., Shallice, T., and Dolan, R. (2000). Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287, 1269-1272.
13. Hoenig, K., and Scheef, L. (2009). Neural correlates of semantic ambiguity processing during context verification. Neuroimage 45,1009-1019.
14. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 512-518.
16. Kan, I., and Thompson-Schill, S. (2004). Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 43-57.
17. Kuperberg, G. R., Lakshmanan, B. M., Caplan, D. N., and Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Making sense of discourse: an fMRI study of causal inferenc-ing across sentences. Neuroimage 33, 343-361.
18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Mason, R. A., and Just, M. A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1-7.
20. Menenti, L., Gierhan, S. M. E., Segaert, K., and Hagoort, P. (2011). Shared Language. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1174-1182.
21. Menenti, L., Petersson, K. M., Scheeringa, R., and Hagoort, P. (2009). When elephants fly: differential sensitivity of right and left inferior frontal gyri to discourse and world knowledge. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 2358-2368.
22. Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., and Osherson, D. N. (2009). The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 12554-12559.
23. Nieuwland, M. S., Petersson, K. M., and Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). On sense and reference: examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing. Neuroimage 37, 993-1004.
24. Parker Jones, O. I., Green, D. W., Gro-gan, A., Pliatsikas, C., Filippopoli-tis, K., Ali, N., Lee, H. L., Rams-den, S., Gazarian, K., Prejawa, S., Seghier,M.L., and Price, C.J. (2011). Where, when and why brain activation differs for bilinguals and mono-linguals during picture naming and reading aloud. Cereb. Cortex. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr16/. [Epub ahead of print].
25. Poser, B. A., Versluis, M. J., Hoog-duin, J. M., and Norris, D. G. (2006). BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired inhomogeneity desensitized fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 55, 1227-1235.
26. Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Petersson, K. M., Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van Den Brink, D. L., Buitelaar, J. K., and Hagoort, P. (2009). Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21,2085-2099.
27. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., and Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15, 273-289
28. Zwaan, R. A., and Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psy-chol. Bull. 123,162-185.