ICF Core Set for Matching Older Adults with Dementia and Technology

Ageing International

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 414-440

  Scherer, Marcia J ^a   Federici, Stefano ^b,c   Tiberio, Lorenza ^c,d   Pigliautile, Martina ^b,c   Corradi, Fabrizio ^c,e   Meloni, Fabio ^c  

^a Institute for Matching Person and Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d CNR   (Italy)

^e Vaccari Institute for Disable People of Rome   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aging; Alzheimer's disease; Assistive Technology (AT); Dementia; Functioning; ICF; ICF core set; Matching Older Adult with Dementia and Technology (MOADT); Population studies; Rehabilitation; Well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874197298     PISSN: 01635158     EISSN: 1936606X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12126-010-9093-9     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Arthanat, S., & Lenker, J. A. (2004). Evaluating the ICF as a framework for clinical assessment of persons for assistive technology device recommendation. Paper presented at the 10th North American Collaborating Center (NACC) Conference on ICF, Halifax, NS, June 1-4.
2. Bharucha, A., Anand, V., Forlizzi, J., Dew, M. A., Reynolds, C. F., III, Stevens, S., et al. (2009). Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(2), 88.
3. Bodine, C., & Scherer, M. J. (2006). Technology for improving cognitive function. A workshop sponsored by the U. S. Interagency committee on disability research (icdr): reports from working groups. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(24), 1567-1571. doi: 10. 1080/09638280601071151.
4. Ferri, C. P., Prince, M., Brayne, C., Brodaty, H., Fratiglioni, L., Ganguli, M., et al. (2006). Global prevalence of dementia: a delphi consensus study. Lancet, 366(9503), 2112-2117. doi: 10. 1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0.
5. Hachinski, V. C., Iliff, L. D., Zilhka, E., Du Boulay, G. H., McAllister, V. L., Marshall, J., et al. (1975). Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 32(9), 632-637. doi: 10. 1001/archneur. 1975. 00490510088009.
6. Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 185(12), 914-919.
7. Kirsch, N. L., & Scherer, M. J. (2010). Assistive technology for cognition and behavior. In R. G. Frank, M. Rosenthal, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Handbook of rehabilitation psychology (2nd ed., pp. 273-284). Washington: American Psychological Association.
8. Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179-186. doi: 10. 1093/geront/9. 3_Part_1. 179.
9. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., Hannay, H. J., & Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J. R. (2006). The addenbrooke's cognitive examination revised (ace-r): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(11), 1078-1085. doi: 10. 1002/gps. 1610.
11. Novak, M., & Guest, C. (1989). Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. The Gerontologist, 29(6), 798-803. doi: 10. 1093/geront/29. 6. 798.
12. Reed, G. M., Dilfer, K., Bufka, L. F., Scherer, M. J., Kotze, P., Tshivhase, M., et al. (2008). Three model curricula for teaching clinicians to use the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(12/13), 927-941. doi: 10. 1080/09638280701800301.
13. Reynish, E., Bickel, H., Fratiglioni, L., Kiejna, A., Prince, M., & Georges, J. (2009). Systematic review and collaborative analysis of the prevalence of dementia in europe. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 5(4, Suppl. 1), P393-P393. doi: 10. 1016/j. jalz. 2009. 04. 1042.
14. Riemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44-50.
15. Scherer, M. J. (2005a). Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(13), 731-739. doi: 10. 1080/09638280400014816.
16. Scherer MJ (2005b) Cross-walking the ICF to a measure of assistive technology predisposition and use. Paper presented at the 11th Annual North American Collaborating Center (NACC) Conference on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), Rochester, NY, June 22-24.
17. Scherer, M. J., & Bodine, C. (2006). Technology for improving cognitive function: report on a workshop sponsored by the u. S. Interagency committee on disability research. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 1(4), 257-261. doi: 10. 1080/17483100600982977.
18. Scherer, M. J., & Dicowden, M. A. (2008). Organizing future research and intervention efforts on the impact and effects of gender differences on disability and rehabilitation: the usefulness of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(3), 161-165. doi: 10. 1080/09638280701532292.
19. Scherer, M. J., & Glueckauf, R. (2005). Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2), 132-141. doi: 10. 1037/0090-5550. 50. 2. 132.
20. Scherer, M. J., Hart, T., Kirsch, N., & Schulthesis, M. (2005). Assistive technologies for cognitive disabilities. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med, 17(3), 195-215. doi: 10. 1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed. v17. i3. 30.
21. Scherer, M. J., Sax, C. L., Vanbiervliet, A., Cushman, L. A., & Scherer, J. V. (2005). Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(21), 1321-1331. doi: 10. 1080/09638280500164800.
22. Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Ewert, T., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S., & Üstün, T. B. (2002). Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(5), 281-282. doi: 10. 1080/10. 1080/09638280110105222.
23. Tinetti, M. E. (1986). Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 34(2), 119-126.
24. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: WHO.